IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v501y2025ics0304380024003922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the evolution of dispersal strategies under the costs of acquisition of private and social information

Author

Listed:
  • Sion, Antoine
  • Marcantonio, Matteo
  • Masier, Stefano
  • Tuci, Elio

Abstract

Dispersal between patches of suitable habitat is a key behaviour for the survival of animal populations and is impacted by rapid environmental changes. Animals must cope with several costs related to the dispersal process, such as expenses in energy to acquire information or increased mortality risks. There is a growing interest in studying how the costs of acquisition of information influence the dispersal behaviour of species, and particularly how the use of social and private information can shape this behaviour over multiple generations. Current models of dispersal rarely incorporate both sources of information, and there is a specific lack of modelling studies taking into account costs of acquisition for private and social information. We develop an agent-based model that simulates a population of butterflies with genetic factors linked to the acquisition of both types of information and their associated reproductive costs. We show that different costs, environmental variability conditions, and sensory abilities result in various dispersal behaviours and have an impact on the fitness of the population. In stable environments, a varying proportion of agents use low-cost information to disperse, but when the cost increases lightly, all agents remain uninformed. In highly variable environments, the same trend is observed, but agents rely on information even if the cost of acquisition increases up to twice compared to stable environments, as it provides an evolutionary advantage. Agents with a limited perceptual range use both information sources equally in variable environments, and those with a bigger perceptual range rely exclusively on private information to make dispersal decisions, except at free cost of acquisition. Globally, the use of information induces a higher fitness for the population in stable environments if the costs of acquisition are free or very low. In variable environmental conditions, the highest fitness is maintained with a limited perceptual range when the total cost rises to twice the value found for stable environments. With a bigger perceptual range, the highest fitness is maintained for the whole range of total costs studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Sion, Antoine & Marcantonio, Matteo & Masier, Stefano & Tuci, Elio, 2025. "On the evolution of dispersal strategies under the costs of acquisition of private and social information," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 501(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:501:y:2025:i:c:s0304380024003922
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.111004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024003922
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.111004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hovestadt, Thomas & Kubisch, Alexander & Poethke, Hans-Joachim, 2010. "Information processing in models for density-dependent emigration: A comparison," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 405-410.
    2. Claire S. Teitelbaum & Sarah J. Converse & William F. Fagan & Katrin Böhning-Gaese & Robert B. O’Hara & Anne E. Lacy & Thomas Mueller, 2016. "Experience drives innovation of new migration patterns of whooping cranes in response to global change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, November.
    3. Poethke, Hans Joachim & Kubisch, Alexander & Mitesser, Oliver & Hovestadt, Thomas, 2016. "The evolution of density-dependent dispersal under limited information," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 338(C), pages 1-10.
    4. Charles A. Bost & Cedric Cotté & Pascal Terray & Christophe Barbraud & Cécile Bon & Karine Delord & Olivier Gimenez & Yves Handrich & Yasuhiko Naito & Christophe Guinet & Henri Weimerskirch, 2015. "Large-scale climatic anomalies affect marine predator foraging behaviour and demography," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, November.
    5. Pe’er, Guy & Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie, 2008. "Incorporating the perceptual range of animals into connectivity models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 73-85.
    6. Bob B.M. Wong & Ulrika Candolin, 2015. "Behavioral responses to changing environments," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(3), pages 665-673.
    7. Julien Cote & Simon Boudsocq & Jean Clobert, 2008. "Density, social information, and space use in the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(1), pages 163-168.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Imron, Muhammad Ali & Gergs, Andre & Berger, Uta, 2012. "Structure and sensitivity analysis of individual-based predator–prey models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 71-81.
    2. Poethke, Hans Joachim & Kubisch, Alexander & Mitesser, Oliver & Hovestadt, Thomas, 2016. "The evolution of density-dependent dispersal under limited information," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 338(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Giovanni Polverino & Upama Aich & Jack A Brand & Michael G Bertram & Jake M Martin & Hung Tan & Vrishin R Soman & Rachel T Mason & Bob B M Wong, 2023. "Sex-specific effects of psychoactive pollution on behavioral individuality and plasticity in fish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(6), pages 969-978.
    4. Katherine A. Zeller & David W. Wattles & Javan M. Bauder & Stephen DeStefano, 2020. "Forecasting Seasonal Habitat Connectivity in a Developing Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Long, X. & Ji, Xi & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "Is urbanization eco-friendly? An energy and land use cross-country analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 387-396.
    6. Barbosa Júnior, Emerson Campos & Dodonov, Pavel & Japyassú, Hilton F. & Vilela, Bruno, 2025. "Effects of phenotypic plasticity on diversification rates and adaptive evolution in simulated environments with different climatic and cost contexts," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 501(C).
    7. Juliana Menger & William E Magnusson & Marti J Anderson & Martin Schlegel & Guy Pe’er & Klaus Henle, 2017. "Environmental characteristics drive variation in Amazonian understorey bird assemblages," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Joel Isabirye, 2021. "The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Foundations, Tenets and Relevance," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 19(1), pages 324-335, May.
    9. Hao Sun & Sheng Zhang & Youyou Jiang & Xingxin Nie & Mingdong Kuang & Zheng Liu, 2025. "The Impact of the Tunnel Micro-Environment on Workers’ Behavior: Considering the Mediating Role of Mental Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Sarkki, Simo & Karjalainen, Timo P., 2015. "Ecosystem service valuation in a governance debate: Practitioners' strategic argumentation on forestry in northern Finland," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 13-22.
    11. Harry R Harding & Timothy A C Gordon & Emma Eastcott & Stephen D Simpson & Andrew N Radford & Leigh Simmons, 2019. "Causes and consequences of intraspecific variation in animal responses to anthropogenic noise," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(6), pages 1501-1511.
    12. Panel, Sophie & Pietri, Antoine, 2022. "God did not save the kings: Environmental consequences of the 1982 Falklands War," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Júnior, Emerson Campos Barbosa & Rios, Vitor Passos & Dodonov, Pavel & Vilela, Bruno & Japyassú, Hilton F, 2022. "Effect of behavioural plasticity and environmental properties on the resilience of communities under habitat loss and fragmentation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    14. Carina Lackmann & Antonio Šimić & Sandra Ečimović & Alma Mikuška & Thomas-Benjamin Seiler & Henner Hollert & Mirna Velki, 2023. "Subcellular Responses and Avoidance Behavior in Earthworm Eisenia andrei Exposed to Pesticides in the Artificial Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Amédée Roy & Sophie Lanco Bertrand & Ronan Fablet, 2022. "Deep inference of seabird dives from GPS-only records: Performance and generalization properties," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Malishev, Matthew & Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie, 2021. "Movement, models, and metabolism: Individual-based energy budget models as next-generation extensions for predicting animal movement outcomes across scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    17. Salau, Kehinde & Schoon, Michael L. & Baggio, Jacopo A. & Janssen, Marco A., 2012. "Varying effects of connectivity and dispersal on interacting species dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 81-91.
    18. Jager, Henriette I. & DeAngelis, Donald L., 2018. "The confluences of ideas leading to, and the flow of ideas emerging from, individual-based modeling of riverine fishes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 341-352.
    19. Bimal Kumar Ghimire & Chang Yeon Yu & Won-Ryeol Kim & Hee-Sung Moon & Joohyun Lee & Seung Hyun Kim & Ill Min Chung, 2023. "Assessment of Benefits and Risk of Genetically Modified Plants and Products: Current Controversies and Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Mattsson, B.J. & Runge, M.C. & Devries, J.H. & Boomer, G.S. & Eadie, J.M. & Haukos, D.A. & Fleskes, J.P. & Koons, D.N. & Thogmartin, W.E. & Clark, R.G., 2012. "A modeling framework for integrated harvest and habitat management of North American waterfowl: Case-study of northern pintail metapopulation dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 146-158.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:501:y:2025:i:c:s0304380024003922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.