IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v472y2022ics0304380022001788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of behavioural plasticity and environmental properties on the resilience of communities under habitat loss and fragmentation

Author

Listed:
  • Júnior, Emerson Campos Barbosa
  • Rios, Vitor Passos
  • Dodonov, Pavel
  • Vilela, Bruno
  • Japyassú, Hilton F

Abstract

Being plastic in face of environmental changes that negatively affect communities can increase the average fitness within populations and alter the resilience of the ecological system. Understanding this effect is important for making predictions about future landscapes. We used simulation studies to assess the effects of dispersal behaviour plasticity on community resilience, in the context of disturbance (habitat loss and fragmentation) caused by humans. We also evaluated how resilience is affected by the cost of plasticity, trophic level and specialisation, and by the extent and clustering of the disturbance, through an agent-based model with 10 model species and 3 trophic levels. We found that community resilience is best explained by plasticity, plasticity cost, disturbance extent, and disturbance clustering, with increased community resilience when the individuals have plasticity. This effect increases with disturbance extent – the resilience increases as the degree of plasticity increases. Herbivores and generalists were more resilient than carnivores and specialists. We conclude that all explanatory variables used in this study are relevant to resilience in a world suffering rapid changes caused by humans.

Suggested Citation

  • Júnior, Emerson Campos Barbosa & Rios, Vitor Passos & Dodonov, Pavel & Vilela, Bruno & Japyassú, Hilton F, 2022. "Effect of behavioural plasticity and environmental properties on the resilience of communities under habitat loss and fragmentation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:472:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001788
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022001788
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morrice, Katherine J. & Baptista, António M. & Burke, Brian J., 2020. "Environmental and behavioral controls on juvenile Chinook salmon migration pathways in the Columbia River estuary," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 427(C).
    2. Sarah E. Overington & Andrea S. Griffin & Daniel Sol & Louis Lefebvre, 2011. "Are innovative species ecological generalists? A test in North American birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(6), pages 1286-1293.
    3. Andrew Sih & Sean Ehlman & Rebecca Halpin, 2015. "On connecting behavioral responses to HIREC to ecological outcomes: a comment on Wong and Candolin," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(3), pages 676-677.
    4. Bob B.M. Wong & Ulrika Candolin, 2015. "Behavioral responses to changing environments," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(3), pages 665-673.
    5. Daniel T. Blumstein, 2015. "Prioritizing conservation behavior research: a comment on Wong and Candolin," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(3), pages 674-674.
    6. Cameron K. Ghalambor & Kim L. Hoke & Emily W. Ruell & Eva K. Fischer & David N. Reznick & Kimberly A. Hughes, 2015. "Non-adaptive plasticity potentiates rapid adaptive evolution of gene expression in nature," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7569), pages 372-375, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kerr, J.R. & Tummers, J.S. & Benson, T. & Lucas, M.C. & Kemp, P.S., 2023. "Modelling fine scale route choice of upstream migrating fish as they approach an instream structure," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    2. Giovanni Polverino & Upama Aich & Jack A Brand & Michael G Bertram & Jake M Martin & Hung Tan & Vrishin R Soman & Rachel T Mason & Bob B M Wong, 2023. "Sex-specific effects of psychoactive pollution on behavioral individuality and plasticity in fish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(6), pages 969-978.
    3. Long, X. & Ji, Xi & Ulgiati, S., 2017. "Is urbanization eco-friendly? An energy and land use cross-country analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 387-396.
    4. Joel Isabirye, 2021. "The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Foundations, Tenets and Relevance," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 19(1), pages 324-335, May.
    5. Sarkki, Simo & Karjalainen, Timo P., 2015. "Ecosystem service valuation in a governance debate: Practitioners' strategic argumentation on forestry in northern Finland," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 13-22.
    6. Harry R Harding & Timothy A C Gordon & Emma Eastcott & Stephen D Simpson & Andrew N Radford & Leigh Simmons, 2019. "Causes and consequences of intraspecific variation in animal responses to anthropogenic noise," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(6), pages 1501-1511.
    7. Carina Lackmann & Antonio Šimić & Sandra Ečimović & Alma Mikuška & Thomas-Benjamin Seiler & Henner Hollert & Mirna Velki, 2023. "Subcellular Responses and Avoidance Behavior in Earthworm Eisenia andrei Exposed to Pesticides in the Artificial Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Bimal Kumar Ghimire & Chang Yeon Yu & Won-Ryeol Kim & Hee-Sung Moon & Joohyun Lee & Seung Hyun Kim & Ill Min Chung, 2023. "Assessment of Benefits and Risk of Genetically Modified Plants and Products: Current Controversies and Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Shane C. Campbell-Staton & Jonathan P. Velotta & Kristin M. Winchell, 2021. "Selection on adaptive and maladaptive gene expression plasticity during thermal adaptation to urban heat islands," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. repec:thr:techub:10019:y:2021:i:1:p:324-335 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Rubén Ortega-Álvarez & Alejandro Casas, 2022. "The Feeding Landscape: Bird and Human Use of Food Resources across a Biocultural Landscape of the Colombian Andes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Sridharan, Vamsi Krishna & Jackson, Doug & Hein, Andrew M. & Perry, Russell W. & Pope, Adam C. & Hendrix, Noble & Danner, Eric M. & Lindley, Steven T., 2023. "Simulating the migration dynamics of juvenile salmonids through rivers and estuaries using a hydrodynamically driven enhanced particle tracking model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    13. Ulrika Candolin & Leigh Simmons, 2019. "Why study intraspecific variation: a comment on Harding et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(6), pages 1515-1516.
    14. Reid S. Brennan & James A. deMayo & Hans G. Dam & Michael B. Finiguerra & Hannes Baumann & Melissa H. Pespeni, 2022. "Loss of transcriptional plasticity but sustained adaptive capacity after adaptation to global change conditions in a marine copepod," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Almendra Rodriguez-Dominguez & Sean D. Connell & Ericka O. C. Coni & Minami Sasaki & David J. Booth & Ivan Nagelkerken, 2022. "Phenotypic responses in fish behaviour narrow as climate ramps up," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Blicharska, Malgorzata & Smithers, Richard J. & Hedblom, Marcus & Hedenås, Henrik & Mikusiński, Grzegorz & Pedersen, Eja & Sandström, Per & Svensson, Johan, 2017. "Shades of grey challenge practical application of the cultural ecosystem services concept," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 55-70.
    17. Calebe Pereira Mendes & John Koprowski, 2019. "Does caching strategy vary with microclimate in endangered Mt. Graham red squirrels?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:472:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022001788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.