IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seizing opportunities: Object neophobia as a factor mediating technical innovation in Goffin´s cockatoos?

Author

Listed:
  • Theresa Rössler
  • Mark O’Hara
  • Berenika Mioduszewska
  • Remco Folkertsma
  • Roger Mundry
  • Alice M I Auersperg

Abstract

Most studies find substantial inter-individual differences in problem-solving performance within a species, which can drastically influence an individual´s fitness. It has been suggested that innovative behavior can be strongly affected by behavioral traits, such as exploration, persistence, neophilia, and neophobia. Individuals who are more neophobic than others may encounter fewer opportunities or favorable interactions but may also show differences in cognitive ability. We tested eleven captive Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana), a model species for innovative problem-solving, for individual variation in object neophobia and whether it relates to motivation and performance in a problem-solving task. We found no evidence that the less neophobic cockatoos were generally better problem-solvers, nor that they were more eager to engage with the setup after familiarization. Our results suggest that object neophobia in this group of Goffin’s cockatoos may not be directly linked to either the ability to innovate or the general motivation to interact with experimental apparatuses. We discuss what these findings could imply for the emergence of innovative behavior as well as the potential limitations of individually tested animals of a highly social species.

Suggested Citation

  • Theresa Rössler & Mark O’Hara & Berenika Mioduszewska & Remco Folkertsma & Roger Mundry & Alice M I Auersperg, 2025. "Seizing opportunities: Object neophobia as a factor mediating technical innovation in Goffin´s cockatoos?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335028
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335028
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335028&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah E. Overington & Andrea S. Griffin & Daniel Sol & Louis Lefebvre, 2011. "Are innovative species ecological generalists? A test in North American birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(6), pages 1286-1293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João Fabrício Mota Rodrigues & Carlos A. Botero, 2025. "The global determinants of climate niche breadth in birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Júnior, Emerson Campos Barbosa & Rios, Vitor Passos & Dodonov, Pavel & Vilela, Bruno & Japyassú, Hilton F, 2022. "Effect of behavioural plasticity and environmental properties on the resilience of communities under habitat loss and fragmentation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.