IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v483y2023ics0304380023001515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing simulated tree biomass from daily, monthly, and seasonal climate input of terrestrial ecosystem model

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Qinying
  • He, Hong S.
  • Liu, Kai
  • Zong, Shengwei
  • Du, Haibo

Abstract

Terrestrial ecosystem models are driven by climate data, which often have daily, monthly, and seasonal resolutions, but few have examined the effects of different temporal resolutions of climate data on modeled vegetation change. In this study, we investigated the effects of daily, monthly, and seasonal climate data on simulated tree-species biomass in a temperate forest region of northeast China. We conducted the study by using the LINKAGES terrestrial ecosystem model to quantify the relative importance of climate data resolutions (daily, monthly and seasonal) and interspecific competition on predicted tree-species biomass from short-term (<40 years) to long-term (70–100 years) simulations. Results showed that simulated tree-species biomass was sensitive to daily, monthly, and seasonal climate data. The difference in the simulated biomass based on daily vs. monthly climate data was not significant for tree species monocultures, suggesting that monthly climate data can be used as a surrogate for daily climate data in such simulations. However, interspecific competition amplifies the differences in biomass simulations under daily and monthly climate data, thus increasing prediction uncertainties in mixed-species systems. Results based on climate data at the seasonal resolution showed the greatest departure from the daily and monthly climate data, because averaging climate data over a season may result in unrealistic climate estimates for modeling tree biomass growth. Simulated biomass of shade-intolerant tree species was highest when using climate data at the daily resolution, followed by monthly and seasonal climate data. The opposite pattern was true for shade-tolerant tree species. At the early stages of simulated tree growth, inter-tree competition was a more important factor affecting the biomass of late-successional, shade-tolerant tree species while different temporal resolutions of climate data were more important for early- and mid-successional species. This trend reverses at the late stages of stand development. These results can help guide choosing climate input of terrestrial ecosystem models and aiding results interpretation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Qinying & He, Hong S. & Liu, Kai & Zong, Shengwei & Du, Haibo, 2023. "Comparing simulated tree biomass from daily, monthly, and seasonal climate input of terrestrial ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:483:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023001515
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380023001515
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110420?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irauschek, Florian & Barka, Ivan & Bugmann, Harald & Courbaud, Benoit & Elkin, Che & Hlásny, Tomáš & Klopcic, Matija & Mina, Marco & Rammer, Werner & Lexer, Manfred J, 2021. "Evaluating five forest models using multi-decadal inventory data from mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 445(C).
    2. Groemping, Ulrike, 2006. "Relative Importance for Linear Regression in R: The Package relaimpo," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 17(i01).
    3. Chiesi, M. & Maselli, F. & Moriondo, M. & Fibbi, L. & Bindi, M. & Running, S.W., 2007. "Application of BIOME-BGC to simulate Mediterranean forest processes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 179-190.
    4. Wang, Tao & Brender, Pierre & Ciais, Philippe & Piao, Shilong & Mahecha, Miguel D. & Chevallier, Frédéric & Reichstein, Markus & Ottlé, Catherine & Maignan, Fabienne & Arain, Altaf & Bohrer, Gil & Ces, 2012. "State-dependent errors in a land surface model across biomes inferred from eddy covariance observations on multiple timescales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 246(C), pages 11-25.
    5. de Bruijn, Arjan & Gustafson, Eric J. & Sturtevant, Brian R. & Foster, Jane R. & Miranda, Brian R. & Lichti, Nathanael I. & Jacobs, Douglass F., 2014. "Toward more robust projections of forest landscape dynamics under novel environmental conditions: Embedding PnET within LANDIS-II," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 287(C), pages 44-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alam, M. Jahangir, 2020. "Capital misallocation: Cyclicality and sources," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. González-Sanchis, Marí a & Del Campo, Antonio D. & Molina, Antonio J. & Fernandes, Tarcí sio J.G., 2015. "Modeling adaptive forest management of a semi-arid Mediterranean Aleppo pine plantation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 308(C), pages 34-44.
    3. Neaimeh, Myriam & Salisbury, Shawn D. & Hill, Graeme A. & Blythe, Philip T. & Scoffield, Don R. & Francfort, James E., 2017. "Analysing the usage and evidencing the importance of fast chargers for the adoption of battery electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 474-486.
    4. Yayoi Natsume-Kitatani & Hiroshi Mamitsuka, 2016. "Classification of Promoters Based on the Combination of Core Promoter Elements Exhibits Different Histone Modification Patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Ma, Shaoxiu & Churkina, Galina & Wieland, Ralf & Gessler, Arthur, 2011. "Optimization and evaluation of the ANTHRO-BGC model for winter crops in Europe," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(20), pages 3662-3679.
    6. Luong Hai Nguyen & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2017. "The Impact of Project Organizational Culture on the Performance of Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    7. João Amador & Arne J. Nagengast, 2015. "The Effect of Bank Shocks on Firm-Level and Aggregate Investment," Working Papers w201515, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    8. Franck M. Ramaharo & Michael Fitiavana Randriamifidy, 2023. "Determinants of renewable energy consumption in Madagascar: Evidence from feature selection algorithms," Working Papers hal-04262240, HAL.
    9. Mitze, Timo & Reinkowski, Janina, 2010. "Testing the Validity of the Neoclassical Migration Model: Overall and Age-Group Specific Estimation Results for German Spatial Planning Regions," MPRA Paper 23616, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Hüttner, Frank & Sunder, Marco, 2011. "Decomposing R2 with the Owen value," Working Papers 100, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Economics and Management Science.
    11. Collalti, Alessio & Perugini, Lucia & Santini, Monia & Chiti, Tommaso & Nolè, Angelo & Matteucci, Giorgio & Valentini, Riccardo, 2014. "A process-based model to simulate growth in forests with complex structure: Evaluation and use of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model in a deciduous forest in Central Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 362-378.
    12. Cailin Wang & Enliang Guo & Yongfang Wang & Buren Jirigala & Yao Kang & Ye Zhang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal variations in drought and waterlogging and their effects on maize yields at different growth stages in Jilin Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(1), pages 155-180, August.
    13. Zhang, Yajun & Wang, Weilu & Li, Siyu & Zhu, Kuanyu & Hua, Xia & Harrison, Matthew Tom & Liu, Ke & Yang, Jianchang & Liu, Lijun & Chen, Yun, 2023. "Integrated management approaches enabling sustainable rice production under alternate wetting and drying irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    14. Maša Zorana Ostrogović Sever & Zoltán Barcza & Dóra Hidy & Anikó Kern & Doroteja Dimoski & Slobodan Miko & Ozren Hasan & Branka Grahovac & Hrvoje Marjanović, 2021. "Evaluation of the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model Biome-BGCMuSo for Modelling Soil Organic Carbon under Different Land Uses," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Ruiz-Pérez, G. & González-Sanchis, M. & Del Campo, A.D. & Francés, F., 2016. "Can a parsimonious model implemented with satellite data be used for modelling the vegetation dynamics and water cycle in water-controlled environments?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 324(C), pages 45-53.
    16. Puertes, Cristina & González-Sanchis, María & Lidón, Antonio & Bautista, Inmaculada & del Campo, Antonio D. & Lull, Cristina & Francés, Félix, 2020. "Improving the modelling and understanding of carbon-nitrogen-water interactions in a semiarid Mediterranean oak forest," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    17. Mattia Cai & Roberto Ferrise & Marco Moriondo & Paulo A.L.D. Nunes & Marco Bindi, 2011. "Climate Change and Tourism in Tuscany, Italy. What if heat becomes unbearable?," Working Papers 2011.67, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    18. Su Jang & Yoo Seok Kang & Yoon Kyung Lee & Hee-Jong Koh, 2020. "Evaluating Multiple Allelic Combination to Determine Tiller Angle Variation in Rice," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-8, September.
    19. Hao Li & Tiantian Li & Wei-Yew Chang, 2023. "Family Identity, Place Identity, and Chinese Farmers’ Environment-Friendly Production Behavior," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Yangyi Zhou & Jiangping Wang, 2023. "The Composition and Assembly of Soil Microbial Communities Differ across Vegetation Cover Types of Urban Green Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:483:y:2023:i:c:s0304380023001515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.