IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v289y2014icp26-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From design to digital model: A quantitative analysis approach to Garden Cities theory

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan, Zhiyuan
  • Zheng, Xinqi
  • Lv, Lina
  • Xue, Chunlu

Abstract

As a complement to the development of new theories, the reevaluation and knowledge mining of classical theories can be beneficial for urban development. In particular, quantitative analyses for cities can now take advantage of geographic information systems (GIS). Proposed more than one hundred years ago, Ebenezer Howard's Garden City is a generally acknowledged classical urban theory. On the basis of the original work, we model a digital Garden City in ArcGIS. The model is accurate to within 1% for both areal and length measures, and enables our further quantitative evaluation of the urban land-use structure and open green space accessibility. We then compare the classical theory with a modern-built area for the quantitative evaluation results. Zhujiajiao Town in Shanghai, winner of the International Award for Livable Communities in 2008, provides a reference. Although the central areas of Garden City and Zhujiajiao Town have different geographical and historical backgrounds, the measured land-use structures, including indicators of area proportion and area per capita, exhibits similarities on land-use types of residential, transportation, and ecological conservation, which offer a considerable reference for land-use structure of a livable urban area. Comparison of the accessibility to open green spaces in both cities shows that the average access time from a residential area to open green space in Garden City is just 186.77s, which is much shorter than that in Zhujiajiao. Our research shows that the classical Garden City theory can be modeled into highly accurate digital forms, allowing richer information in quantitative terms to be obtained than from the original theory, and enabling comparisons with modern cities. Besides, the proposed digital modeling approach is widely applicable to classical theories and historical planning cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan, Zhiyuan & Zheng, Xinqi & Lv, Lina & Xue, Chunlu, 2014. "From design to digital model: A quantitative analysis approach to Garden Cities theory," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 289(C), pages 26-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:289:y:2014:i:c:p:26-35
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.06.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030438001400297X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.06.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E Talen & L Anselin, 1998. "Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(4), pages 595-613, April.
    2. Mahmoud AL-HADER & Ahmad RODZI, 2009. "The Smart City Infrastructure Development & Monitoring," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(2(11)), pages 87-94, May.
    3. Zhang, Yan & Liu, Hong & Fath, Brian D., 2014. "Synergism analysis of an urban metabolic system: Model development and a case study for Beijing, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 188-197.
    4. Hall, Myrna H.P., 2011. "A preliminary assessment of socio-ecological metabolism for three neighborhoods within a rust belt urban ecosystem," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 20-31.
    5. Yang, Dewei & Kao, William Tze Ming & Zhang, Guoqin & Zhang, Nanyang, 2014. "Evaluating spatiotemporal differences and sustainability of Xiamen urban metabolism using emergy synthesis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 40-48.
    6. Martin Herold & Joseph Scepan & Keith C Clarke, 2002. "The Use of Remote Sensing and Landscape Metrics to Describe Structures and Changes in Urban Land Uses," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(8), pages 1443-1458, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. João Monteiro & Nuno Sousa & Eduardo Natividade-Jesus & João Coutinho-Rodrigues, 2022. "Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Yunda Wang & Qiguan Shu & Ming Chen & Xudounan Chen & Shiro Takeda & Junhua Zhang, 2022. "Selection and Application of Quantitative Indicators of Paths Based on Graph Theory: A Case Study of Traditional Private and Antique Gardens in Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Carolina Rojas Quezada & Felipe Jorquera, 2021. "Urban Fabrics to Eco-Friendly Blue–Green for Urban Wetland Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jørgensen, Sven E. & Nielsen, Søren Nors & Fath, Brian D., 2016. "Recent progress in systems ecology," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 112-118.
    2. Zhu, Xueting & Mu, Xianzhong & Hu, Guangwen, 2019. "Ecological network analysis of urban energy metabolic system—A case study of Beijing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 404(C), pages 36-45.
    3. Thomas Elliot & Javier Babí Almenar & Samuel Niza & Vânia Proença & Benedetto Rugani, 2019. "Pathways to Modelling Ecosystem Services within an Urban Metabolism Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Christopher M. Bacon & Gregory A. Baker, 2017. "The rise of food banks and the challenge of matching food assistance with potential need: towards a spatially specific, rapid assessment approach," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 899-919, December.
    5. Lucia Cellucci & Chiara Burattini & Dionysia Drakou & Franco Gugliermetti & Fabio Bisegna & Andrea De Lieto Vollaro & Ferdinando Salata & Iacopo Golasi, 2015. "Urban Lighting Project for a Small Town: Comparing Citizens and Authority Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Iga Solecka & Dietmar Bothmer & Arkadiusz Głogowski, 2019. "Recognizing Landscapes for the Purpose of Sustainable Development—Experiences from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Raoof Mostafazadeh & Hossein Talebi Khiavi, 2024. "Landscape change assessment and its prediction in a mountainous gradient with diverse land-uses," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 3911-3941, February.
    8. Shirkou Jaafari & Yousef Sakieh & Afshin Alizadeh Shabani & Afshin Danehkar & Ali-akbar Nazarisamani, 2016. "Landscape change assessment of reservation areas using remote sensing and landscape metrics (case study: Jajroud reservation, Iran)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1701-1717, December.
    9. Jinling Zhao & Jie Wang & Yu Jin & Lingling Fan & Chao Xu & Dong Liang & Linsheng Huang, 2018. "Land Cover Based Landscape Pattern Dynamics of Anhui Province Using GlobCover and MCD12Q1 Global Land Cover Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Sarah Hasan & Wenzhong Shi & Xiaolin Zhu & Sawaid Abbas & Hafiz Usman Ahmed Khan, 2020. "Future Simulation of Land Use Changes in Rapidly Urbanizing South China Based on Land Change Modeler and Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Daniel Otero Peña & Daniela Perrotti & Eugene Mohareb, 2022. "Advancing urban metabolism studies through GIS data: Resource flows, open space networks, and vulnerable communities in Mexico City," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1333-1349, August.
    12. Eeva-Sofia Säynäjoki & Jukka Heinonen & Seppo Junnila, 2014. "The Power of Urban Planning on Environmental Sustainability: A Focus Group Study in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Zhang, Can & Su, Bo & Beckmann, Michael & Volk, Martin, 2024. "Emergy-based evaluation of ecosystem services: Progress and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Funke, Michael & Niebuhr, Annekatrin, 2000. "Spatial R&D Spillovers and Economic Growth - Evidence from West Germany," Discussion Paper Series 26396, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    15. Xiaodong Yang & Yongxiang Wu & Hang Dang, 2017. "Urban Land Use Efficiency and Coordination in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    16. Mabon, Leslie & Shih, Wan-Yu, 2018. "What might ‘just green enough’ urban development mean in the context of climate change adaptation? The case of urban greenspace planning in Taipei Metropolis, Taiwan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 224-238.
    17. Daniel Kpienbaareh & Evans Sumabe Batung & Isaac Luginaah, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Change of Land Cover in Protected Areas in Malawi: Implications for Conservation Management," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Sedigheh Lotfi & M. Koohsari, 2009. "Analyzing Accessibility Dimension of Urban Quality of Life: Where Urban Designers Face Duality Between Subjective and Objective Reading of Place," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 417-435, December.
    19. Sabina Buczkowska & Nicolas Coulombel & Matthieu Lapparent, 2019. "A comparison of Euclidean Distance, Travel Times, and Network Distances in Location Choice Mixture Models," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1215-1248, December.
    20. Giordano, P. & Caputo, P. & Vancheri, A., 2014. "Fuzzy evaluation of heterogeneous quantities: Measuring urban ecological efficiency," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 112-126.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:289:y:2014:i:c:p:26-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.