IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v34y2002i8p1443-1458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Remote Sensing and Landscape Metrics to Describe Structures and Changes in Urban Land Uses

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Herold
  • Joseph Scepan
  • Keith C Clarke

Abstract

Remote sensing technology has great potential for acquisition of detailed and accurate land-use information for management and planning of urban regions. However, the determination of land-use data with high geometric and thematic accuracy is generally limited by the availability of adequate remote sensing data, in terms of spatial and temporal resolution, and digital image analysis techniques. This study introduces a methodology using information on image spatial form—landscape metrics—to describe urban land-use structures and land-cover changes that result from urban growth. The analysis is based on spatial analysis of land-cover structures mapped from digitally classified aerial photographs of the urban region Santa Barbara, CA. Landscape metrics were calculated for segmented areas of homogeneous urban land use to allow a further characterization of the land use of these areas. The results show a useful separation and characterization of three urban land-use types: commercial development, high-density residential, and low-density residential. Several important structural land-cover features were identified for this study. These were: the dominant general land cover (built up or vegetation), the housing density, the mean structure and plot size, and the spatial aggregation of built-up areas. For two test areas in the Santa Barbara region, changes (urban growth) in the urban spatial land-use structure can be described and quantified with landscape metrics. In order to discriminate more accurately between the three land-cover types of interest, the landscape metrics were further refined into what are termed ‘landscape metric signatures’ for the land-use categories. The analysis shows the importance of the spatial measurements as second-order image information that can contribute to more detailed mapping of urban areas and towards a more accurate characterization of spatial urban growth pattern.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Herold & Joseph Scepan & Keith C Clarke, 2002. "The Use of Remote Sensing and Landscape Metrics to Describe Structures and Changes in Urban Land Uses," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(8), pages 1443-1458, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:34:y:2002:i:8:p:1443-1458
    DOI: 10.1068/a3496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a3496
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a3496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T V Mesev & P A Longley & M Batty & Y Xie, 1995. "Morphology from Imagery: Detecting and Measuring the Density of Urban Land Use," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(5), pages 759-780, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kiril Stanilov, 2002. "Postwar Trends, Land-Cover Changes, and Patterns of Suburban Development: The Case of Greater Seattle," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 29(2), pages 173-195, April.
    2. Fulong Wu & David Martin, 2002. "Urban Expansion Simulation of Southeast England Using Population Surface Modelling and Cellular Automata," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(10), pages 1855-1876, October.
    3. Britta G Bierwagen, 2005. "Predicting Ecological Connectivity in Urbanizing Landscapes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(5), pages 763-776, October.
    4. F Wu, 1998. "An Empirical Model of Intrametropolitan Land-Use Changes in a Chinese City," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 25(2), pages 245-263, April.
    5. F Wu, 1998. "An Experiment on the Generic Polycentricity of Urban Growth in a Cellular Automatic City," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 25(5), pages 731-752, October.
    6. M Batty & Y Xie, 1996. "Preliminary Evidence for a Theory of the Fractal City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(10), pages 1745-1762, October.
    7. Pengfei Ban & Wei Zhan & Qifeng Yuan & Xiaojian Li, 2021. "Delineating the Urban Areas of a Cross-Boundary City with Open-Access Data: Guangzhou–Foshan, South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Anthony Gar-On Yeh & Xia Li, 2002. "A Cellular Automata Model to Simulate Development Density for Urban Planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 29(3), pages 431-450, June.
    9. Yılmaz, Merve & Terzi, Fatih, 2021. "Measuring the patterns of urban spatial growth of coastal cities in developing countries by geospatial metrics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Eric J Heikkila & Ti-Yan Shen & Kai-Zhong Yang, 2003. "Fuzzy Urban Sets: Theory and Application to Desakota Regions in China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(2), pages 239-254, April.
    11. Stuart L Barr & Michael J Barnsley & Alan Steel, 2004. "On the Separability of Urban Land-Use Categories in Fine Spatial Scale Land-Cover Data Using Structural Pattern Recognition," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(3), pages 397-418, June.
    12. P A Longley, 1998. "GIS and the Development of Digital Urban Infrastructure," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 25(7), pages 53-56, December.
    13. Paul A Longley & Victor Mesev, 2000. "On the Measurement and Generalisation of Urban Form," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(3), pages 473-488, March.
    14. Eric J. Heikkila & Ti-yan Shen & Kai-zhong Yang, 2003. "Fuzzy Urban Sets: Theory and Application to Desakota Regions in China," Working Paper 8617, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:34:y:2002:i:8:p:1443-1458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.