IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v202y2007i3p225-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models

Author

Listed:
  • Miller, Jennifer
  • Franklin, Janet
  • Aspinall, Richard

Abstract

Predictive vegetation modeling (PVM), is defined as predicting the distribution of vegetation across a landscape based on the relationship between the spatial distribution of vegetation and environmental variables. PVM requires digital maps of the environmental variables, as well as spatial information on the vegetation attribute of interest (e.g., species, type, abundance), usually from a sample of locations. Often these predictive models are developed using traditional statistical methods and are based on the implicit assumption that the distribution of vegetation is random and, therefore, each observation is independent. This approach violates one of the basic tenets of geography, the direct relationship between distance and likeness, as well as of ecological theory, that elements of an ecosystem close to one another are more likely to be influenced by the same generating process and will therefore be similar. Some of the spatial structure can be explained by the predictor variables used in the model. Environmental variables such as precipitation, temperature and elevation exhibit spatial dependence, some of which is responsible for spatial clustering in vegetation distribution, but remaining spatial dependence can result from either unmeasured environmental variables or biotic processes that cause spatial clustering. Spatial dependence in biogeographical data has been recently identified as an important area of future PVM research, and many studies have begun to explore ways to incorporate spatial dependence in predictive models. Here we review the different approaches to incorporating spatial dependence into predictive vegetation models focusing on four statistical methods: autoregressive models, geostatistics, geographically weighted regression, and parameter estimation models. Autoregressive models may be more capable of describing the fine-scaled spatial dependence that results from local biotic factors, such as disturbance, competition, or dispersal, while geostatistical methods may be more suitable for modeling broad-scale spatial dependence. The other methods focus on global and local parameter estimation in the presence of spatially structured or nonstationary data. While this review focuses on incorporating spatial dependence into statistical models for predictive purposes, explicitly including spatial dependence in models can also aid in clarifying the effect of different explanatory variables, thereby improving inferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Miller, Jennifer & Franklin, Janet & Aspinall, Richard, 2007. "Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 225-242.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:202:y:2007:i:3:p:225-242
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380006006247
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. S. Weir & A. N. Pettitt, 2000. "Binary probability maps using a hidden conditional autoregressive Gaussian process with an application to Finnish common toad data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 49(4), pages 473-484.
    2. Daniel P. McMillen, 2003. "Spatial Autocorrelation Or Model Misspecification?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(2), pages 208-217, April.
    3. Nicolas Titeux & Marc Dufrène & Jean-Paul Jacob & Marc Paquay & Pierre Defourny, 2004. "Multivariate analysis of a fine-scale breeding bird atlas using a geographical information system and partial canonical correspondence analysis: environmental and spatial effects," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/230790, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Austin, Mike, 2007. "Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santika, Truly & Hutchinson, Michael F., 2009. "The effect of species response form on species distribution model prediction and inference," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2365-2379.
    2. Yirigui Yirigui & Sang-Woo Lee & A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi & Matthew R. Herman & Jong-Won Lee, 2019. "Relationships between Riparian Forest Fragmentation and Biological Indicators of Streams," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Peters, Jan & Verhoest, Niko E.C. & Samson, Roeland & Van Meirvenne, Marc & Cockx, Liesbet & De Baets, Bernard, 2009. "Uncertainty propagation in vegetation distribution models based on ensemble classifiers," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(6), pages 791-804.
    4. Shubha Pandit & April Hayward & Jan Leeuw & Jurek Kolasa, 2010. "Does plot size affect the performance of GIS-based species distribution models?," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 389-407, December.
    5. Hengl, Tomislav & Sierdsema, Henk & Radović, Andreja & Dilo, Arta, 2009. "Spatial prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence-only records: combining point pattern analysis, ENFA and regression-kriging," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3499-3511.
    6. repec:asg:wpaper:1017 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Platts, Philip J. & McClean, Colin J. & Lovett, Jon C. & Marchant, Rob, 2008. "Predicting tree distributions in an East African biodiversity hotspot: model selection, data bias and envelope uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 121-134.
    8. repec:asg:wpaper:1015 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Lundy, M.E. & Hill, J.E. & van Kessel, C. & Owen, D.A. & Pedroso, R.M. & Boddy, L.G. & Fischer, A.J. & Linquist, B.A., 2014. "Site-specific, real-time temperatures improve the accuracy of weed emergence predictions in direct-seeded rice systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 12-21.
    10. Lv, Zhike & Gao, Zhenya, 2021. "The effect of corruption on environmental performance: Does spatial dependence play a role?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(2).
    11. Thoralf Meyer & Paul Holloway & Thomas B. Christiansen & Jennifer A. Miller & Paolo D’Odorico & Gregory S. Okin, 2019. "An Assessment of Multiple Drivers Determining Woody Species Composition and Structure: A Case Study from the Kalahari, Botswana," Land, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Flores, O. & Rossi, V. & Mortier, F., 2009. "Autocorrelation offsets zero-inflation in models of tropical saplings density," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1797-1809.
    13. Bevan, Andrew & Conolly, James, 2011. "Terraced fields and Mediterranean landscape structure: An analytical case study from Antikythera, Greece," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(7), pages 1303-1314.
    14. Wulder, Michael A. & White, Joanne C. & Coops, Nicholas C. & Nelson, Trisalyn & Boots, Barry, 2007. "Using local spatial autocorrelation to compare outputs from a forest growth model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 264-276.
    15. Valenti, D. & Tranchina, L. & Brai, M. & Caruso, A. & Cosentino, C. & Spagnolo, B., 2008. "Environmental metal pollution considered as noise: Effects on the spatial distribution of benthic foraminifera in two coastal marine areas of Sicily (Southern Italy)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 449-462.
    16. Liviano Solís, Daniel & Arauzo Carod, Josep Maria, 2011. "Industrial Location and Space: New Insights," Working Papers 2072/152137, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santika, Truly & Hutchinson, Michael F., 2009. "The effect of species response form on species distribution model prediction and inference," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2365-2379.
    2. Karsten Rusche, 2010. "Quality of life in the regions: an exploratory spatial data analysis for West German labor markets," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 30(1), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Vicente Rios Ibañez, 2014. "What drives regional unemployment convergence?," ERSA conference papers ersa14p924, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Douglas J Shinneman & Robert E Means & Kevin M Potter & Valerie D Hipkins, 2016. "Exploring Climate Niches of Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa Douglas ex Lawson) Haplotypes in the Western United States: Implications for Evolutionary History and Conservation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez & Luísa G Carvalheiro & Chiara Polce & E Emiel van Loon & Niels Raes & Menno Reemer & Jacobus C Biesmeijer, 2013. "Fit-for-Purpose: Species Distribution Model Performance Depends on Evaluation Criteria – Dutch Hoverflies as a Case Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    7. Marco Helbich & Wolfgang Brunauer & Eric Vaz & Peter Nijkamp, 2014. "Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic House Price Models: The Case of Austria," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 390-411, February.
    8. Copiello, Sergio, 2019. "Peer and neighborhood effects: Citation analysis using a spatial autoregressive model and pseudo-spatial data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 238-254.
    9. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    10. Pelayo Acevedo & Alberto Jiménez-Valverde & Jorge M. Lobo & Raimundo Real, 2017. "Predictor weighting and geographical background delimitation: two synergetic sources of uncertainty when assessing species sensitivity to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 131-143, November.
    11. Roger Bivand, 2008. "Implementing Representations Of Space In Economic Geography," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 1-27, February.
    12. Wolfgang Brunauer & Stefan Lang & Peter Wechselberger & Sven Bienert, 2008. "Additive Hedonic Regression Models with Spatial Scaling Factors: An Application for Rents in Vienna," Working Papers 2008-17, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck.
    13. Yihua Yu & Dan S. Rickman, 2013. "US state and local fiscal policies and non-metropolitan area economic performance: A spatial equilibrium analysis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(3), pages 579-597, August.
    14. Lintz, Heather E. & McCune, Bruce & Gray, Andrew N. & McCulloh, Katherine A., 2011. "Quantifying ecological thresholds from response surfaces," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 427-436.
    15. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    16. Marmion, Mathieu & Luoto, Miska & Heikkinen, Risto K. & Thuiller, Wilfried, 2009. "The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3512-3520.
    17. Sellami, Mohamed Habib & Sifaoui, Mohamed Salah, 2008. "Modelling of heat and mass transfer inside a traditional oasis: Experimental validation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 144-154.
    18. Alexander März & Nadja Klein & Thomas Kneib & Oliver Musshoff, 2016. "Analysing farmland rental rates using Bayesian geoadditive quantile regression," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 43(4), pages 663-698.
    19. Rodrigo MENDIETA MUÑOZ & Nicola PONTAROLLO, 2018. "Territorial Growth in Ecuador: The Role of Economic Sectors," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 124-139, December.
    20. Muhammad Hadi Saputra & Han Soo Lee, 2021. "Evaluation of Climate Change Impacts on the Potential Distribution of Styrax sumatrana in North Sumatra, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:202:y:2007:i:3:p:225-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.