IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v230y2025ics0921800924003744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder perceptions of the Norwegian salmon farming industry and its future challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Haugen, Juliana Figueira
  • Olaussen, Jon Olaf

Abstract

Aquaculture has emerged as the fastest growing sector in global food production, with salmon farming in the lead. Norway is responsible for over half of the world salmon production, but its industry faces significant challenges which must be addressed to achieve sustainability. One key issue is the lack of a unified understanding among stakeholders of how production affects the environment and intersects with the interests of other users. Given this context, this present study aims to understand the diverse perspectives of different groups of stakeholders regarding the expansion challenges faced by the Norwegian salmon farming industry. We assessed environmental, socio-economic, operational, and regulatory aspects, highlighting areas of agreement and disagreement among stakeholders using Q-methodology. Our results reveal four distinct stakeholder groups, two of which reveal polarized views, while the other two present more balanced opinions. We believe that our findings facilitate enriched dialogues among stakeholders and provide insights into the management of the industry, while addressing the dilemma of ensuring sustainability amid pressures for production growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Haugen, Juliana Figueira & Olaussen, Jon Olaf, 2025. "Stakeholder perceptions of the Norwegian salmon farming industry and its future challenges," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:230:y:2025:i:c:s0921800924003744
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003744
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bård Misund & Marit Schei Olsen & Tonje C. Osmundsen & Ragnar Tveterås, 2023. "The Political Economy of Salmon Aquaculture: Value Sharing and Societal Support for Aquaculture in Norway," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(4), pages 365-390.
    2. Whitmarsh, David & Palmieri, Maria Giovanna, 2009. "Social acceptability of marine aquaculture: The use of survey-based methods for eliciting public and stakeholder preferences," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 452-457, May.
    3. Hermelingmeier, Verena & Nicholas, Kimberly A., 2017. "Identifying Five Different Perspectives on the Ecosystem Services Concept Using Q Methodology," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 255-265.
    4. Tiller, Rachel & Brekken, Tove & Bailey, Jennifer, 2012. "Norwegian aquaculture expansion and Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM): Simmering conflicts and competing claims," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1086-1095.
    5. Grimsrud, Kristine & Graesse, Maximo & Lindhjem, Henrik, 2020. "Using the generalised Q method in ecological economics: A better way to capture representative values and perspectives in ecosystem service management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Liu, Yajie & Olaf Olaussen, Jon & Skonhoft, Anders, 2011. "Wild and farmed salmon in Norway--A review," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 413-418, May.
    7. Onozaka, Yuko & Honkanen, Pirjo & Altintzoglou, Themistoklis, 2023. "Sustainability, perceived quality and country of origin of farmed salmon: Impact on consumer choices in the USA, France and Japan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. McNicholas, Grace & Cotton, Matthew, 2019. "Stakeholder perceptions of marine plastic waste management in the United Kingdom," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 77-87.
    9. Margrethe Aanesen & Claire Armstrong & Trude Borch & Reinhold Fieler & Vera Hausner & Gorm Kipperberg & Henrik Lindhjem & Ståle Navrud, 2023. "To Tell or Not to Tell: Preference Elicitation with and without Emphasis on Scientific Uncertainty," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(3), pages 397-412.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ertör, Irmak & Ortega-Cerdà, Miquel, 2015. "Political lessons from early warnings: Marine finfish aquaculture conflicts in Europe," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 202-210.
    2. Chen, Chung-Ling & Qiu, Guo-Hao, 2014. "The long and bumpy journey: Taiwan׳s aquaculture development and management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 152-161.
    3. Little, Cedric & Felzensztein, Christian & Gimmon, Eli & Muñoz, Pablo, 2015. "The business management of the Chilean salmon farming industry," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 108-117.
    4. Buckwell, Andrew & Fleming, Christopher & Muurmans, Maggie & Smart, James & Mackey, Brendan, 2020. "Revealing the dominant discourses of stakeholders towards natural resource management in Port Resolution, Vanuatu, using Q-method," 2020 Conference (64th), February 12-14, 2020, Perth, Western Australia 305231, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Bordt, Michael, 2018. "Discourses in Ecosystem Accounting: A Survey of the Expert Community," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 82-99.
    6. Liu, Zhenzhen & Geng, Xianhui & Gao, Zhifeng & Zhang, Jingqiu, 2025. "Consumer preference for fresh produce: Does the biological control influence their choices?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 2030-2042.
    7. M. Okimoto, 2020. "Optimal trade strategy of a regional economy by food exports," Papers 2003.04307, arXiv.org.
    8. Ana Rita Marques & Henny Forde & Crawford W Revie, 2018. "Time-series clustering of cage-level sea lice data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Thøgersen, John, 2023. "How does origin labelling on food packaging influence consumer product evaluation and choices? A systematic literature review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Johanna Norris & Bettina Matzdorf & Rena Barghusen & Christoph Schulze & Bart van Gorcum, 2021. "Viewpoints on Cooperative Peatland Management: Expectations and Motives of Dutch Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Dirtje Marie Derksen & Dagmar Mithöfer, 2022. "Thinking sustainably? Identifying Stakeholders' positions toward corporate sustainability in floriculture with Q methodology," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1762-1787, December.
    12. Elomina, Jerbelle & Pülzl, Helga, 2021. "How are forests framed? An analysis of EU forest policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Outeiro, Luis & Villasante, Sebastian & Oyarzo, Hugo, 2018. "The interplay between fish farming and nature based recreation-tourism in Southern Chile: A perception approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PA), pages 90-100.
    14. Munari & Mahfudz & Sasterio Mansur & Abdul Rivai & Nawawi Natsir, 2020. "Quality of Academic Services in the Academic Bureau, Students, and Planning of Tadulako Palu University," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(8), pages 103-112, August.
    15. Flood, Kate & Mahon, Marie & McDonagh, John, 2024. "A process perspective of conceptual innovation: Integrating equity in applications of the ecosystem services concept in Ireland," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Erlend Dancke Sandorf & Kristine Grimsrud & Henrik Lindhjem, 2022. "Ponderous, Proficient or Professional? Survey Experience and Smartphone Effects in Stated Preference Research," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(4), pages 807-832, April.
    17. Meles, Tensay Hadush & Lokina, Razack & Mtenga, Erica Louis & Tibanywana, Julieth Julius, 2023. "Stated preferences with survey consequentiality and outcome uncertainty: A split sample discrete choice experiment," EfD Discussion Paper 23-16, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    18. Wang, Qiuchen & Liu, Hongyi & Ore, Fredrik & Wang, Lihui & Hauge, Jannicke Baalsrud & Meijer, Sebastiaan, 2023. "Multi-actor perspectives on human robotic collaboration implementation in the heavy automotive manufacturing industry - A Swedish case study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Xiaozi Liu & Henrik Lindhjem & Kristine Grimsrud & Einar Leknes & Endre Tvinnereim, 2023. "Is there a generational shift in preferences for forest carbon sequestration vs. preservation of agricultural landscapes?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(9), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Chen, Yung-Sheng & Lee, Cheng-Ting & Wang, Yu-Cheng & Chang, Tsai-Ling & Liu, Ta-Kang, 2024. "Research on the implementation of integrated coastal management principles in Taiwan to mitigate disputes related to nuclear waste disposal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:230:y:2025:i:c:s0921800924003744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.