IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v99y2023i3p397-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To Tell or Not to Tell: Preference Elicitation with and without Emphasis on Scientific Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Margrethe Aanesen
  • Claire Armstrong
  • Trude Borch
  • Reinhold Fieler
  • Vera Hausner
  • Gorm Kipperberg
  • Henrik Lindhjem
  • Ståle Navrud

Abstract

Decisions about the optimal use of coastal and marine resources must be made with high uncertainty about environmental impacts and may conflict with public perception of the risk associated with current blue growth initiatives. In a discrete choice experiment conducted in valuation workshops in five communities in Arctic Norway, we examine public preferences for various aquaculture expansion paths. Respondents prefer a smaller expansion in terms of the number of aquaculture sites compared with the planned expansion. Emphasizing scientific uncertainty regarding the negative environmental impacts of aquaculture leads to lower resistance against the planned expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Margrethe Aanesen & Claire Armstrong & Trude Borch & Reinhold Fieler & Vera Hausner & Gorm Kipperberg & Henrik Lindhjem & Ståle Navrud, 2023. "To Tell or Not to Tell: Preference Elicitation with and without Emphasis on Scientific Uncertainty," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(3), pages 397-412.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:99:y:2023:i:3:p:397-412
    Note: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/le.99.3.021122-0011R
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/99/3/397
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tensay Hadush Meles & Razack Lokina & Erica Louis Mtenga & Julieth Julius Tibanywana, 2023. "Stated Preferences with Survey Consequentiality and Outcome Uncertainty: A Split Sample Discrete Choice Experiment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(4), pages 717-754, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:99:y:2023:i:3:p:397-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://le.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.