IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v177y2025ics0190740925003391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embedding children’s participation in child protection: The burden of decision making and the potential of complexity theory

Author

Listed:
  • Michail, Samia
  • Fattore, Tobia
  • Grace, Rebekah

Abstract

Incorporating children’s voices into institutional decision making is considered a challenge despite the widespread policy imperative to do so. This paper problematises organisational management approaches that struggle to lead to children’s participation in favour of complexity theory. It applies complexity theory to decision making in an Australian child protection system to demonstrate the potential value of a systems approach in normalising child participation. Decision makers indicate that determining child safety is burdensome and as a core process influences their engagement with children. There are three complications evident: the extensive scope and scale of decisions; the gravity of the decisions; and the emotional toll of those decisions. An organisational management approach perceives these complications to be intensified if children’s voices are added to the decision-making process and there is a resultant sense of ambivalence around the uptake of children’s participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michail, Samia & Fattore, Tobia & Grace, Rebekah, 2025. "Embedding children’s participation in child protection: The burden of decision making and the potential of complexity theory," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925003391
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925003391
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s0190740925003391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.