IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v121y2021ics019074092032199x.html

Institutional care for the vulnerable children in India: The perspective of institutional caregivers

Author

Listed:
  • Rohta, Sonam

Abstract

A large number of children in India are exposed to vulnerabilities and difficult circumstances for the sake of their survival. A total of 1.8 lakh children are residing in child care institutions in India as their parents were found incapable to fulfill their basic necessities like food, shelter and clothing (Jena Committee Report, 2017). In low-income countries, a very little is known about the caregivers who work in child care institutions and play a significant role in the lives of institutionalised children. The study aims to unravel the role of the institutional care system through in-depth semi structured interviews with 20 caregivers working in four different child care institutions in two regions of Northern India. The present study found out that due to poverty, lack of access to education and other basic necessities, children in care have better opportunities for their future than living with their biological parents. The study also highlights the financial issues and the problems faced by children with disabilities living in care institutions. Therefore, the findings of the study focus on the significance of the institutional care system in the lives of vulnerable children in India.

Suggested Citation

  • Rohta, Sonam, 2021. "Institutional care for the vulnerable children in India: The perspective of institutional caregivers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:121:y:2021:i:c:s019074092032199x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019074092032199X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105777?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdullah, Alhassan & Cudjoe, Ebenezer & Manful, Esmeranda, 2018. "Barriers to childcare in Children's Homes in Ghana: Caregivers' solutions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 450-456.
    2. Uliando, Anna & Mellor, David, 2012. "Maltreatment of children in out-of-home care: A review of associated factors and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2280-2286.
    3. Dunn, Dena Miller & Culhane, Sara E. & Taussig, Heather N., 2010. "Children's appraisals of their experiences in out-of-home care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1324-1330, October.
    4. Dutta, Satarupa, 2016. "Institutional care in India: Investigating processes for social reintegration," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 144-153.
    5. Bessell, Sharon, 2011. "Participation in decision-making in out-of-home care in Australia: What do young people say?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 496-501, April.
    6. Khoo, Evelyn & Mancinas, Sandra & Skoog, Viktoria, 2015. "We are not orphans. Children's experience of everyday life in institutional care in Mexico," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Bettmann, Joanna E. & Mortensen, Jamie M. & Akuoko, Kofi O., 2015. "Orphanage caregivers' perceptions of children's emotional needs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 71-79.
    8. Sullivan, Amanda L. & Farnsworth, Elyse M. & Susman-Stillman, Amy, 2018. "Patterns and predictors of childcare subsidies for children with and without special needs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 218-228.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sílvia Alves & Mariana Lucas Casanova & Manuela Sanches-Ferreira & Sérgio Costa Araújo & Luiza Nobre Lima & Clara Cruz Santos, 2025. "A Systematic Review of Residential Care for Children and Young People with Disabilities: Towards the Development of Quality Indicators," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(1), pages 241-271, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdullah, Alhassan & Cudjoe, Ebenezer & Manful, Esmeranda, 2018. "Barriers to childcare in Children's Homes in Ghana: Caregivers' solutions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 450-456.
    2. Shawar, Yusra Ribhi & Meraj, Shafkat & Koon, Adam D. & Shiffman, Jeremy, 2025. "Political factors shaping national systems of care for orphans and vulnerable children in low-income countries: Scoping review and framework," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Wanglar, Evergreat, 2021. "Child care institutions in India: Investigating issues and challenges in children’s rehabilitation and social integration," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Vis, Svein Arild & Fossum, Sturla, 2013. "Representation of children's views in court hearings about custody and parental visitations — A comparison between what children wanted and what the courts ruled," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2101-2109.
    5. Mishra, Rachna & Sondhi, Vanita, 2021. "Theorizing pathways to resilience among orphaned adolescents in institutional care in India," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Berit Skauge & Anita Skårstad Storhaug & Edgar Marthinsen, 2021. "The What, Why and How of Child Participation—A Review of the Conceptualization of “Child Participation” in Child Welfare," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Sutinah, & Aminah, Siti, 2018. "Child abuse and neglect in orphanages in EAST JAVA Province (Study on forms of child abuse, anticipatory efforts developed children and the role of the orphanage)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 24-29.
    8. Angela A. Quaye & Imelda Coyne & Maja Söderbäck & Inger Kristensson Hallström, 2019. "Children's active participation in decision‐making processes during hospitalisation: An observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4525-4537, December.
    9. Elizabeth Fernandez, 2014. "Child Protection and Vulnerable Families: Trends and Issues in the Australian Context," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Costanzo, Molly A. & Magnuson, Katherine, 2024. "Child care access for families raising children with disabilities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Waid, Jeffrey & Kothari, Brianne H. & McBeath, Bowen M. & Bank, Lew, 2017. "Foster home integration as a temporal indicator of relational well-being," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 137-145.
    12. Novelle, Michelle A. & Gonyea, Judith G., 2016. "The availability and role of non-parental identity agents for institutionalized male adolescent social orphans in Colombia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 51-60.
    13. Keddell, Emily, 2023. "Recognising the embedded child in child protection: Children’s participation, inequalities and cultural capital," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    14. Gazit, Matan & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2020. "Disadvantaged youth’s participation in collective decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    15. Roche, Steven, 2019. "A scoping review of children's experiences of residential care settings in the global South," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-1.
    16. repec:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:08:p:322-331 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Goh, Esther C.L. & Baruch, Herzl, 2018. "Young persons as epistemological agents in social work assessment and intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 88-95.
    18. Paulsen, Veronika & Berg, Berit, 2016. "Social support and interdependency in transition to adulthood from child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 125-131.
    19. Dutta, Satarupa, 2017. "Life after leaving care: Experiences of young Indian girls," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 266-273.
    20. Sattler, Kierra M.P. & Herd, Toria & Font, Sarah A., 2023. "Foster care, kinship care, and the transition to adulthood: Do child welfare system processes explain differences in outcomes?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    21. Havlicek, Judy & Lin, Ching-Hsuan & Braun, Michael T., 2016. "Cultivating youth voice through participation in a Foster youth advisory board: Perspectives of facilitators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:121:y:2021:i:c:s019074092032199x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.