IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v116y2020ics019074092030058x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking parent–child relationship to peer relationship based on the parent-peer relationship spillover theory: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Lisha
  • He, Xiaoli
  • Li, Chaoqun
  • Xu, Liangyuan
  • Li, Yanfang

Abstract

The parent-peer relationship spillover theory holds that individuals are embedded in various interdependent social systems (e.g., parent-peer systems) and there is a spillover between parent–child and peer relationships. This study applied this theory to explore a direct and indirect (through children’s interpersonal character and academic achievement) linkages between parent–child relationships (i.e., parental time with children, parent–child closeness and conflict) and children’s peer relationships (i.e., peer acceptance and rejection) in China. Participants were 992 fourth- to ninth-graders (48.1% male; Mage = 12.6 years) and both their parents. Multiple sources of information (parent reports, self-ratings, sociometric methods, and achievement data) was used. The results showed that: (1) For the direct linkage, mother–child conflict was positively linked to children’s peer rejection, father–child conflict was negatively linked to children’s peer acceptance. (2) For the indirect linkage, children’s interpersonal character and academic achievement played distinct driving mechanisms linking parent–child relationships to peer relationships. Specifically, the higher levels of mother–child and father-child closeness were related to better interpersonal character of children which, in turn, is associated with peer acceptance. By contrast, the higher levels of mother–child and father-child conflict were linked to children’s lower acceptance and higher rejection from peer through lower levels of academic achievement. These findings support the spillover theory and provide relevant empirical evidence from China, and advance our understanding of parental functioning on children’s peer relationships within Chinese culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Lisha & He, Xiaoli & Li, Chaoqun & Xu, Liangyuan & Li, Yanfang, 2020. "Linking parent–child relationship to peer relationship based on the parent-peer relationship spillover theory: Evidence from China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:116:y:2020:i:c:s019074092030058x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019074092030058X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juyeon Lee, 2018. "Prosocial Parent-to-Peer Path Model for South Korean School-Aged Children," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(6), pages 1867-1888, December.
    2. Emilia Del Bono & Marco Francesconi & Yvonne Kelly & Amanda Sacker, 2016. "Early Maternal Time Investment and Early Child Outcomes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(596), pages 96-135, October.
    3. Yang, Juan & Zhao, Xinhui, 2020. "Parenting styles and children’s academic performance: Evidence from middle schools in China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Emilia Del Bono & Marco Francesconi & Yvonne Kelly & Amanda Sacker, 2016. "Early Maternal Time Investment and Early Child Outcomes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(596), pages 96-135, October.
    5. Amy Hsin, 2009. "Parent’s Time with Children: Does Time Matter for Children’s Cognitive Achievement?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 123-126, August.
    6. Malczyk, Benjamin R. & Lawson, Hal A., 2017. "Parental monitoring, the parent-child relationship and children's academic engagement in mother-headed single-parent families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 274-282.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu Guangping & Zhang Guo & Li Yanfei & Yu Yang, 2024. "The Heterogeneous Effect and Transmission Paths of Air Pollution on Housing Prices: Evidence from 30 Large- and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17.
    2. Xiaoyu Lan & Chen Wang & Guanyu Cui, 2023. "Peer Relationship Profiles among Early Adolescents from Low-Income Families: The Unique and Combined Effects of Attachment to Mothers and Conscientiousness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Zhang, Xinwen & Sek-yum Ngai, Steven, 2024. "Behavioral development in the Shadow of child Neglect: The roles of resilience and peer rejection," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bigoni, Maria & Bortolotti, Stefania & Fort, Margherita & Guarini, Annalisa & Iorio, Daniela & Monfardini, Chiara & Sansavini, Alessandra & Sansone, Davide & Suttora, Chiara, 2023. "A New Time-Use Diary App to Measure Parental Investments," IZA Discussion Papers 16661, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Nicoletti, Cheti & Tonei, Valentina, 2020. "Do parental time investments react to changes in child’s skills and health?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Tomás Cano & Pablo Gracia, 2022. "The Gendered Effects of Divorce on Mothers’ and Fathers’ Time with Children and Children’s Developmental Activities: A Longitudinal Study," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(5), pages 1277-1313, December.
    4. Aline Bütikofer & Deirdre Coy & Orla Doyle & Rita Ginja, 2024. "The Consequences of Miscarriage on Parental Investments," CESifo Working Paper Series 11003, CESifo.
    5. Zhong, Jingdong & Wang, Tianyi & He, Yang & Gao, Jingjing & Liu, Chengfang & Lai, Fang & Zhang, Liuxiu & Luo, Renfu, 2021. "Interrelationships of caregiver mental health, parenting practices, and child development in rural China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Briole, Simon & Le Forner, Hélène & Lepinteur, Anthony, 2020. "Children’s socio-emotional skills: Is there a quantity–quality trade-off?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Shoji, Masahiro, 2020. "Early-Life Circumstances and Adult Locus of Control: Evidence from 46 Developing Countries," MPRA Paper 99987, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Arenas-Arroyo, Esther & Schmidpeter, Bernhard, 2022. "Spillover effects of immigration policies on children's human capital," Ruhr Economic Papers 974, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    9. Armin Falk & Fabian Kosse & Pia Pinger & Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch & Thomas Deckers, 2021. "Socioeconomic Status and Inequalities in Children’s IQ and Economic Preferences," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(9), pages 2504-2545.
    10. Katja Maria Kaufmann & Yasemin Özdemir & Han Ye, 2022. "Spillover Effects of Old-Age Pension across Generations: Family Labor Supply and Child Outcomes," CESifo Working Paper Series 9813, CESifo.
    11. Marion Davin & Emmanuelle Lavaine, 2021. "The role of health at birth and parental investment in early child development: evidence from the French ELFE cohort," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(8), pages 1217-1237, November.
    12. Brant Abbott, 2022. "Incomplete Markets and Parental Investments in Children," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 44, pages 104-124, April.
    13. Efi Adamopoulou & Anne Hannusch & Karen Kopecky & Tim Obermeier, 2025. "Cohabitation, Child Development, and College Costs," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_628, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    14. Hélène Le Forner, 2023. "Parents' Separation: What is the Effect on Parents' and Children's Time Investments?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 85(4), pages 718-754, August.
    15. Marlon R. Tracey & Chanita C. Holmes & Marvin G. Powell, 2024. "Parental limit-setting decisions and adolescent subject grades," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 143-171, March.
    16. Kiessling, Lukas, 2021. "How do parents perceive the returns to parenting styles and neighborhoods?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    17. Elizabeth M. Caucutt & Lance Lochner & Joseph Mullins & Youngmin Park, 2020. "Child Skill Production: Accounting for Parental and Market-Based Time and Goods Investments," NBER Working Papers 27838, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Huebener, Mathias & Kuehnle, Daniel & Spiess, C. Katharina, 2019. "Parental leave policies and socio-economic gaps in child development: Evidence from a substantial benefit reform using administrative data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Jonas Jessen & Christa Katharina Spieß & Sevrin Waights, 2022. "Centre‐Based Care and Parenting Activities," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(6), pages 1356-1379, December.
    20. Matt Dickson & Lindsey Macmilllan, 2020. "Inequality in access to grammar schools," CEPEO Briefing Note Series 3, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Apr 2020.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:116:y:2020:i:c:s019074092030058x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.