IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v69y2014icp184-197.html

Alternatives to the usual likelihood ratio test in mixed linear models

Author

Listed:
  • Stein, Markus Chagas
  • da Silva, Michel Ferreira
  • Duczmal, Luiz Henrique

Abstract

The small-sample performance of alternatives to the usual likelihood ratio test in mixed linear models is investigated. Specifically, the following tests for fixed effects are considered: (i) a bootstrap-based test, (ii) the Bartlett-corrected usual test, and (iii) an adjusted profile likelihood ratio test. The last test is derived using an approximation to the modified profile likelihood proposed by Barndorff-Nielsen, based on the work of Severini. Bootstrap resampling is performed to numerically construct a Bartlett correction factor for the usual test statistic, and also to obtain a critical value that does not rely on first-order asymptotics. The numerical evidence presented in the paper slightly favors the Bartlett-corrected usual test. An application to real longitudinal data is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Stein, Markus Chagas & da Silva, Michel Ferreira & Duczmal, Luiz Henrique, 2014. "Alternatives to the usual likelihood ratio test in mixed linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 184-197.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:184-197
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.08.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947313002880
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2013.08.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. J. Welham & R. Thompson, 1997. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Fixed Model Terms using Residual Maximum Likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(3), pages 701-714.
    2. Guolo, Annamaria & Brazzale, Alessandra R. & Salvan, Alessandra, 2006. "Improved inference on a scalar fixed effect of interest in nonlinear mixed-effects models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 1602-1613, December.
    3. Melo, Tatiane F.N. & Ferrari, Silvia L.P. & Cribari-Neto, Francisco, 2009. "Improved testing inference in mixed linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2573-2582, May.
    4. David M. Zucker & Offer Lieberman & Orly Manor, 2000. "Improved small sample inference in the mixed linear model: Bartlett correction and adjusted likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(4), pages 827-838.
    5. N. Sartori, 2003. "Modified profile likelihoods in models with stratum nuisance parameters," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(3), pages 533-549, September.
    6. Cribari-Neto, Francisco & Frery, Alejandro C. & Silva, Michel F., 2002. "Improved estimation of clutter properties in speckled imagery," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 801-824, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariana C. Araújo & Audrey H. M. A. Cysneiros & Lourdes C. Montenegro, 2020. "Improved heteroskedasticity likelihood ratio tests in symmetric nonlinear regression models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 167-188, February.
    2. Yoshifumi Ukyo & Hisashi Noma & Kazushi Maruo & Masahiko Gosho, 2019. "Improved Small Sample Inference Methods for a Mixed-Effects Model for Repeated Measures Approach in Incomplete Longitudinal Data Analysis," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Fernanda Maria Müller & Fábio M Bayer, 2017. "Improved two-component tests in Beta-Skew-t-EGARCH models," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2364-2373.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoshifumi Ukyo & Hisashi Noma & Kazushi Maruo & Masahiko Gosho, 2019. "Improved Small Sample Inference Methods for a Mixed-Effects Model for Repeated Measures Approach in Incomplete Longitudinal Data Analysis," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Ventura, Laura & Sartori, Nicola & Racugno, Walter, 2013. "Objective Bayesian higher-order asymptotics in models with nuisance parameters," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 90-96.
    3. Geert Dhaene & Koen Jochmans, 2011. "Profile-score Adjustements for Nonlinearfixed-effect Models," Working Papers hal-01073733, HAL.
    4. Cavit Pakel & Neil Shephard & Kevin Sheppard & Robert F. Engle, 2021. "Fitting Vast Dimensional Time-Varying Covariance Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 652-668, July.
    5. Cavit Pakel & Neil Shephard & Kevin Sheppard, 2009. "Nuisance parameters, composite likelihoods and a panel of GARCH models," OFRC Working Papers Series 2009fe03, Oxford Financial Research Centre.
    6. Ito, Tsubasa & Sugasawa, Shonosuke, 2021. "Improved confidence regions in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09ij4j0h0h1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Giuliana Cortese & Nicola Sartori, 2016. "Integrated likelihoods in parametric survival models for highly clustered censored data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 382-404, July.
    9. Johannes S. Kunz & Kevin E. Staub & Rainer Winkelmann, 2021. "Predicting individual effects in fixed effects panel probit models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(3), pages 1109-1145, July.
    10. Dhaene, Geert & Jochmans, Koen, 2016. "Likelihood Inference In An Autoregression With Fixed Effects," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(5), pages 1178-1215, October.
    11. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1mc4dip81d9t8r0t57fe1h8lap is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Pakel, Cavit, 2019. "Bias reduction in nonlinear and dynamic panels in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 459-492.
    13. Negreiros, Ana Cláudia Souza Vidal de & Lins, Isis Didier & Moura, Márcio José das Chagas & Droguett, Enrique López, 2020. "Reliability data analysis of systems in the wear-out phase using a (corrected) q-Exponential likelihood," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Pianto, Donald M. & Cribari-Neto, Francisco, 2011. "Dealing with monotone likelihood in a model for speckled data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 1394-1409, March.
    15. Orelien, Jean G. & Edwards, Lloyd J., 2008. "Fixed-effect variable selection in linear mixed models using R2 statistics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 1896-1907, January.
    16. Geert Dhaene & Koen Jochmans, 2015. "Split-panel Jackknife Estimation of Fixed-effect Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(3), pages 991-1030.
    17. Xuan Leng & Jiaming Mao & Yutao Sun, 2023. "Debiased Inference for Dynamic Nonlinear Panels with Multi-dimensional Heterogeneities," Papers 2305.03134, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    18. Manuel Arellano & Jinyong Hahn, 2005. "Understanding Bias in Nonlinear Panel Models: Some Recent Developments," Working Papers wp2005_0507, CEMFI.
    19. Ruggero Bellio & Annamaria Guolo, 2016. "Integrated Likelihood Inference in Small Sample Meta-analysis for Continuous Outcomes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 191-201, March.
    20. Lee, Yoonseok & Phillips, Peter C.B., 2015. "Model selection in the presence of incidental parameters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 474-489.
    21. Koen Jochmans, 2018. "Semiparametric Analysis of Network Formation," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 705-713, October.
    22. Geert Dhaene & Koen Jochmans, 2015. "Profile-score adjustments for incidental-parameter problems," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/323dml6suu9, Sciences Po.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:184-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.