IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v153y2021ics0167947320301596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved confidence regions in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Ito, Tsubasa
  • Sugasawa, Shonosuke

Abstract

Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies have been gathering attention in research in clinical epidemiology and health technology development, and bivariate random-effects model is becoming a standard tool. However, standard inference methods usually underestimate statistical errors and possibly provide highly overconfident results under realistic situations since they ignore the variability in the estimation of variance parameters. To overcome the difficulty, a new improved inference method, namely, an accurate confidence region for the meta-analysis of DTA, by asymptotically expanding the coverage probability of the standard confidence region. The advantage of the proposed confidence region is that it holds a relatively simple expression and does not require any repeated calculations such as Bootstrap or Monte Carlo methods to compute the region, thereby the proposed method can be easily carried out in practical applications. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated through simulation studies and an application to meta-analysis of screening test accuracy for alcohol problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ito, Tsubasa & Sugasawa, Shonosuke, 2021. "Improved confidence regions in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:153:y:2021:i:c:s0167947320301596
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2020.107068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947320301596
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2020.107068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han Chen & Alisa K. Manning & Josée Dupuis, 2012. "A Method of Moments Estimator for Random Effect Multivariate Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1278-1284, December.
    2. Hisashi Noma & Kengo Nagashima & Toshi A. Furukawa, 2020. "Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta‐analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(1), pages 337-347, March.
    3. Richard D. Riley, 2009. "Multivariate meta‐analysis: the effect of ignoring within‐study correlation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(4), pages 789-811, October.
    4. David M. Zucker & Offer Lieberman & Orly Manor, 2000. "Improved small sample inference in the mixed linear model: Bartlett correction and adjusted likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(4), pages 827-838.
    5. Yong Chen & Yulun Liu & Jing Ning & Janice Cormier & Haitao Chu, 2015. "A hybrid model for combining case–control and cohort studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 469-489, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John B. Copas & Dan Jackson & Ian R. White & Richard D. Riley, 2018. "The role of secondary outcomes in multivariate meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1177-1205, November.
    2. Freling, Traci H. & Vincent, Leslie H. & Henard, David H., 2014. "When not to accentuate the positive: Re-examining valence effects in attribute framing," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 95-109.
    3. Hui Yao & Sungduk Kim & Ming-Hui Chen & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Arvind K. Shah & Jianxin Lin, 2015. "Bayesian Inference for Multivariate Meta-Regression With a Partially Observed Within-Study Sample Covariance Matrix," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(510), pages 528-544, June.
    4. Dan Jackson & Sylwia Bujkiewicz & Martin Law & Richard D. Riley & Ian R. White, 2018. "A matrix†based method of moments for fitting multivariate network meta†analysis models with multiple outcomes and random inconsistency effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 548-556, June.
    5. Yoshifumi Ukyo & Hisashi Noma & Kazushi Maruo & Masahiko Gosho, 2019. "Improved Small Sample Inference Methods for a Mixed-Effects Model for Repeated Measures Approach in Incomplete Longitudinal Data Analysis," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-15, March.
    6. David M. Zucker & Jonathan Denne, 2002. "Sample–Size Redetermination for Repeated Measures Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 548-559, September.
    7. Jerome Geyer-Klingeberg & Markus Hang & Andreas W. Rathgeber & Stefan Stöckl & Matthias Walter, 2018. "What do we really know about corporate hedging? A meta-analytical study," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(1), pages 1-31, February.
    8. Elena Kulinskaya & Stephan Morgenthaler & Robert G. Staudte, 2014. "Combining Statistical Evidence," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 214-242, August.
    9. Bodnar, Olha & Bodnar, Taras, 2021. "Objective Bayesian meta-analysis based on generalized multivariate random effects model," Working Papers 2021:5, Örebro University, School of Business.
    10. Shi, Chengchun & Song, Rui & Lu, Wenbin & Fu, Bo, 2018. "Maximin projection learning for optimal treatment decision with heterogeneous individualized treatment effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102112, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Sohail Akhtar & Jamal Abdul Nasir & Muhammad Usman & Aqsa Sarwar & Rizwana Majeed & Baki Billah, 2020. "The prevalence of hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients in Pakistan: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Ian R. White, 2011. "Multivariate random-effects meta-regression: Updates to mvmeta," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 11(2), pages 255-270, June.
    13. Vargas, Tiago M. & Ferrari, Silvia L.P. & Lemonte, Artur J., 2014. "Improved likelihood inference in generalized linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 110-124.
    14. Blakeley B. McShane & Ulf Böckenholt, 2018. "Multilevel Multivariate Meta-analysis with Application to Choice Overload," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 255-271, March.
    15. Keisuke Hanada & Tomoyuki Sugimoto, 2023. "Inference using an exact distribution of test statistic for random-effects meta-analysis," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 75(2), pages 281-302, April.
    16. Melo, Tatiane F.N. & Ferrari, Silvia L.P. & Cribari-Neto, Francisco, 2009. "Improved testing inference in mixed linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2573-2582, May.
    17. Pia Abel zur Wiesch & Roger Kouyos & Sören Abel & Wolfgang Viechtbauer & Sebastian Bonhoeffer, 2014. "Cycling Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Hospitals: Meta-Analysis and Models," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Stein, Markus Chagas & da Silva, Michel Ferreira & Duczmal, Luiz Henrique, 2014. "Alternatives to the usual likelihood ratio test in mixed linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 184-197.
    19. Rebecca Graziani & Sergio Venturini, 2020. "A Bayesian approach to discrete multiple outcome network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:153:y:2021:i:c:s0167947320301596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.