IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i10p3640-3649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The choice of the number of bins for the M statistic

Author

Listed:
  • White, Laura Forsberg
  • Bonetti, Marco
  • Pagano, Marcello

Abstract

Methods to monitor spatial patterns of disease in populations are of interest in public health practice. The M statistic uses interpoint distances between cases to detect abnormalities in the spatial patterns of diseases. This statistic compares the observed distribution of interpoint distances with that which is expected when no unusual spatial patterns exist. We show the relationship of M to Pearson's Chi Square statistic, . Both statistics require the discretization of continuous data into bins and then are formed by creating a quadratic form, scaled by an appropriate variance covariance matrix. We seek to choose the number and type of these bins for the M statistic so as to maximize the power to detect spatial anomalies. By showing the relationship between M to , we argue for the extension of the theory that has been developed for the selection of the number and type of bins for to M. We further show that spatial data provides a unique insight into the problem through examples with simulated data and spatial data from a health care provider. In the spatial setting, these indicate that the optimal number of bins depends on the size of the cluster. For large clusters, a smaller number of bins appears to be preferable, however for small clusters having many bins increases the power. Further, results indicate that the number of bins does not appear to vary with m, the number of spatial locations. We discuss the implications of this result for further work.

Suggested Citation

  • White, Laura Forsberg & Bonetti, Marco & Pagano, Marcello, 2009. "The choice of the number of bins for the M statistic," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3640-3649, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:10:p:3640-3649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(09)00101-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kulldorff, Martin & Tango, Toshiro & Park, Peter J., 2003. "Power comparisons for disease clustering tests," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 665-684, April.
    2. Kowalski J. & Pagano M. & DeGruttola V., 2002. "A Nonparametric Test of Gene Region Heterogeneity Associated With Phenotype," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 398-408, June.
    3. Ozonoff, Al & Bonetti, Marco & Forsberg, Laura & Pagano, Marcello, 2005. "Power comparisons for an improved disease clustering test," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 679-684, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pietro Tebaldi & Marco Bonetti & Marcello Pagano, 2011. "M statistic commands: Interpoint distance distribution analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 11(2), pages 271-289, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pei-Sheng Lin, 2014. "Generalized Scan Statistics for Disease Surveillance," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(3), pages 791-808, September.
    2. Demattei[diaeresis], Christophe & Molinari, Nicolas & Daures, Jean-Pierre, 2007. "Arbitrarily shaped multiple spatial cluster detection for case event data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 3931-3945, May.
    3. D. Gunzler & W. Tang & N. Lu & P. Wu & X. Tu, 2014. "A Class of Distribution-Free Models for Longitudinal Mediation Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 543-568, October.
    4. HAEDO, Christian & MOUCHART , Michel & ,, 2013. "Specialized agglomerations with areal data: model and detection," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2013060, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Ozonoff, Al & Bonetti, Marco & Forsberg, Laura & Pagano, Marcello, 2005. "Power comparisons for an improved disease clustering test," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 679-684, April.
    6. Wan, You & Pei, Tao & Zhou, Chenghu & Jiang, Yong & Qu, Chenxu & Qiao, Youlin, 2012. "ACOMCD: A multiple cluster detection algorithm based on the spatial scan statistic and ant colony optimization," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 283-296.
    7. Silva, Ivair R. & Duczmal, Luiz & Kulldorff, Martin, 2021. "Confidence intervals for spatial scan statistic," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Rashidi, Parinaz & Wang, Tiejun & Skidmore, Andrew & Vrieling, Anton & Darvishzadeh, Roshanak & Toxopeus, Bert & Ngene, Shadrack & Omondi, Patrick, 2015. "Spatial and spatiotemporal clustering methods for detecting elephant poaching hotspots," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 297(C), pages 180-186.
    9. Ibrahim Musa & Hyun Woo Park & Lkhagvadorj Munkhdalai & Keun Ho Ryu, 2018. "Global Research on Syndromic Surveillance from 1993 to 2017: Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Fei He & Daniel R. Jeske & Elizabeth Grafton‐Cardwell, 2020. "Identifying high‐density regions of pests within an orchard," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 417-431, May.
    11. Wei Wang & Sheng Li & Tao Zhang & Fei Yin & Yue Ma, 2023. "Detecting the spatial clustering of exposure–response relationships with estimation error: a novel spatial scan statistic," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3522-3532, December.
    12. Peter B. Gilbert & Chunyuan Wu & David V. Jobes, 2008. "Genome Scanning Tests for Comparing Amino Acid Sequences Between Groups," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 198-207, March.
    13. Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & Assunção, Renato Martins & Kulldorff, Martin, 2012. "Constrained spanning tree algorithms for irregularly-shaped spatial clustering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1771-1783.
    14. Mohammad Meysami & Joshua P. French & Ettie M. Lipner, 2023. "Flexible-Elliptical Spatial Scan Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
    15. Jeffery Caroline & Ozonoff Al & White Laura Forsberg & Pagano Marcello, 2013. "Distance-Based Mapping of Disease Risk," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 265-290, May.
    16. William H. Woodall & J Brooke Marshall & Michael D. Joner Jr & Shannon E Fraker & Abdel‐Salam G Abdel‐Salam, 2008. "On the use and evaluation of prospective scan methods for health‐related surveillance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(1), pages 223-237, January.
    17. Zhang, Tonglin & Lin, Ge, 2009. "Spatial scan statistics in loglinear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2851-2858, June.
    18. Marco Bonetti & Raffaella Piccarreta & Gaia Salford, 2013. "Parametric and Nonparametric Analysis of Life Courses: An Application to Family Formation Patterns," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(3), pages 881-902, June.
    19. Zhang, Tonglin & Lin, Ge, 2013. "On the limiting distribution of the spatial scan statistic," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 215-225.
    20. Porter, Michael D. & Brown, Donald E., 2007. "Detecting local regions of change in high-dimensional criminal or terrorist point processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 2753-2768, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:10:p:3640-3649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.