IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v144y2020ics0167947319302439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smoothed empirical likelihood inference and variable selection for quantile regression with nonignorable missing response

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Ting
  • Wang, Lei

Abstract

With nonignorable missing responses, an efficient estimator and a variable selection method for quantile regression coefficient are proposed based on smoothed weighted empirical likelihood (SWEL). To handle the identifiability issue, a part of covariates named as nonresponse instrument is used, which is related to response but unrelated to the propensity conditioned on response and other observed covariates. The generalized method of moments is applied to estimate the parameters in the nonresponse propensity. Based on inverse probability weighting and kernel smoothing approaches, consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed estimator for quantile regression coefficient are established. The asymptotic properties of the resulting SWEL ratio function and the corresponding confidence regions are derived. Further, a penalized SWEL method and its algorithm for variable selection are investigated. The finite-sample performance of the proposed estimator is studied through simulation, and an application to HIV-CD4 data set is also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Ting & Wang, Lei, 2020. "Smoothed empirical likelihood inference and variable selection for quantile regression with nonignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:144:y:2020:i:c:s0167947319302439
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2019.106888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947319302439
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2019.106888?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Lars Peter, 1982. "Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 1029-1054, July.
    2. Whitney K. Newey & Richard J. Smith, 2004. "Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 219-255, January.
    3. Jiahua Chen & Zehua Chen, 2008. "Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(3), pages 759-771.
    4. Siamak Ghasemzadeh & Mojtaba Ganjali & Taban Baghfalaki, 2018. "Bayesian quantile regression for analyzing ordinal longitudinal responses in the presence of non-ignorable missingness," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 76(3), pages 321-348, December.
    5. Koenker,Roger, 2005. "Quantile Regression," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521845731, January.
    6. Qin J. & Leung D. & Shao J., 2002. "Estimation With Survey Data Under Nonignorable Nonresponse or Informative Sampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 193-200, March.
    7. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    8. Hansheng Wang & Bo Li & Chenlei Leng, 2009. "Shrinkage tuning parameter selection with a diverging number of parameters," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 671-683, June.
    9. repec:mpr:mprres:8160 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Whang, Yoon-Jae, 2006. "Smoothed Empirical Likelihood Methods For Quantile Regression Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 173-205, April.
    11. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    12. Chenlei Leng & Cheng Yong Tang, 2012. "Penalized empirical likelihood and growing dimensional general estimating equations," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(3), pages 703-716.
    13. Jun Shao & Lei Wang, 2016. "Semiparametric inverse propensity weighting for nonignorable missing data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(1), pages 175-187.
    14. Chunrong Ai & Oliver Linton & Zheng Zhang, 2018. "A simple and efficient estimation method for models with nonignorable missing data," CeMMAP working papers CWP02/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    15. Otsu, Taisuke, 2008. "Conditional empirical likelihood estimation and inference for quantile regression models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 508-538, January.
    16. Kim, Jae Kwang & Yu, Cindy Long, 2011. "A Semiparametric Estimation of Mean Functionals With Nonignorable Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 157-165.
    17. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    18. Ying Yuan & Guosheng Yin, 2010. "Bayesian Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Studies with Nonignorable Missing Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 105-114, March.
    19. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    20. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheqi Wang & Dehui Wang & Jianhua Cheng, 2023. "A new autoregressive process driven by explanatory variables and past observations: an application to PM 2.5," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(2), pages 619-658, June.
    2. Hairu Wang & Zhiping Lu & Yukun Liu, 2023. "Score test for missing at random or not under logistic missingness models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1268-1279, June.
    3. Ke, Baofang & Zhao, Weihua & Wang, Lei, 2023. "Smoothed tensor quantile regression estimation for longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    4. Aiai Yu & Yujie Zhong & Xingdong Feng & Ying Wei, 2023. "Quantile regression for nonignorable missing data with its application of analyzing electronic medical records," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2036-2049, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Wang & Wei Ma, 2021. "Improved empirical likelihood inference and variable selection for generalized linear models with longitudinal nonignorable dropouts," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(3), pages 623-647, June.
    2. Parente, Paulo M.D.C. & Smith, Richard J., 2011. "Gel Methods For Nonsmooth Moment Indicators," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 74-113, February.
    3. Tian, Yuzhu & Song, Xinyuan, 2020. "Bayesian bridge-randomized penalized quantile regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Ying Sheng & Yifei Sun & Chiung‐Yu Huang & Mi‐Ok Kim, 2022. "Synthesizing external aggregated information in the presence of population heterogeneity: A penalized empirical likelihood approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 679-690, June.
    5. Wang, Tao & Zhu, Lixing, 2011. "Consistent tuning parameter selection in high dimensional sparse linear regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(7), pages 1141-1151, August.
    6. Ando, Tomohiro & Sueishi, Naoya, 2019. "Regularization parameter selection for penalized empirical likelihood estimator," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1-4.
    7. Yoonsuh Jung, 2018. "Multiple predicting K-fold cross-validation for model selection," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 197-215, January.
    8. Aiai Yu & Yujie Zhong & Xingdong Feng & Ying Wei, 2023. "Quantile regression for nonignorable missing data with its application of analyzing electronic medical records," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2036-2049, September.
    9. Tang, Cheng Yong & Leng, Chenlei, 2012. "An empirical likelihood approach to quantile regression with auxiliary information," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 29-36.
    10. Yu-Zhu Tian & Man-Lai Tang & Wai-Sum Chan & Mao-Zai Tian, 2021. "Bayesian bridge-randomized penalized quantile regression for ordinal longitudinal data, with application to firm’s bond ratings," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1289-1319, June.
    11. Qingliang Fan & Yaqian Wu, 2020. "Endogenous Treatment Effect Estimation with some Invalid and Irrelevant Instruments," Papers 2006.14998, arXiv.org.
    12. Fan, Jianqing & Liao, Yuan, 2012. "Endogeneity in ultrahigh dimension," MPRA Paper 38698, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Yunquan Song & Zitong Li & Minglu Fang, 2022. "Robust Variable Selection Based on Penalized Composite Quantile Regression for High-Dimensional Single-Index Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Jiang, Liewen & Bondell, Howard D. & Wang, Huixia Judy, 2014. "Interquantile shrinkage and variable selection in quantile regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 208-219.
    15. Ping Zeng & Yongyue Wei & Yang Zhao & Jin Liu & Liya Liu & Ruyang Zhang & Jianwei Gou & Shuiping Huang & Feng Chen, 2014. "Variable selection approach for zero-inflated count data via adaptive lasso," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 879-894, April.
    16. Dai, Linlin & Chen, Kani & Sun, Zhihua & Liu, Zhenqiu & Li, Gang, 2018. "Broken adaptive ridge regression and its asymptotic properties," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 334-351.
    17. Yu-Zhu Tian & Man-Lai Tang & Mao-Zai Tian, 2021. "Bayesian joint inference for multivariate quantile regression model with L $$_{1/2}$$ 1 / 2 penalty," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2967-2994, December.
    18. Ruggieri, Eric & Lawrence, Charles E., 2012. "On efficient calculations for Bayesian variable selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1319-1332.
    19. Abdul Wahid & Dost Muhammad Khan & Ijaz Hussain, 2017. "Robust Adaptive Lasso method for parameter’s estimation and variable selection in high-dimensional sparse models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Huiwen Wang & Ruiping Liu & Shanshan Wang & Zhichao Wang & Gilbert Saporta, 2020. "Ultra-high dimensional variable screening via Gram–Schmidt orthogonalization," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1153-1170, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:144:y:2020:i:c:s0167947319302439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.