IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v201y2025ip3s0960077925013888.html

Optimizing risk transfer in dynamic insurance networks: A graph-based reinforcement learning framework

Author

Listed:
  • Atta Mills, Ebenezer Fiifi Emire

Abstract

The optimization of risk transfer within interconnected insurance networks has become increasingly complex, requiring models that effectively capture dynamic financial environments. This paper introduces a mathematical framework designed to optimize risk transfer in dynamic insurance networks by integrating graph neural networks with multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. The model accounts for key complexities, such as stochastic capital flows, heterogeneous risk appetites, dynamically correlated risks, and endogenous systemic risk feedback, within an evolving network structure. A graph neural network is employed to learn the time-dependent correlation structure of insurer losses directly from the network, while a proximal policy optimization algorithm is used to dynamically optimize risk transfer policies. To ensure robustness under extreme uncertainty, the framework utilizes Entropic Value-at-Risk as its core risk measure, providing a conservative and coherent optimization objective aligned with regulatory standards. An illustrative example demonstrates the model’s ability to enhance network stability, reduce tail risks, and support financial resilience. These results highlight the model’s potential to transform risk transfer strategies within interconnected insurance networks, offering valuable insights that can inform both insurance risk management practices and regulatory frameworks. Future validation through extensive numerical experiments is proposed to further assess the model’s effectiveness in real-world scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Atta Mills, Ebenezer Fiifi Emire, 2025. "Optimizing risk transfer in dynamic insurance networks: A graph-based reinforcement learning framework," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P3).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:201:y:2025:i:p3:s0960077925013888
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925013888
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Risk sharing under the dominant peer-to-peer property and casualty insurance business models," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021001, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    2. Trainar, P., 2004. "Insurance and financial stability," Financial Stability Review, Banque de France, issue 5, pages 73-89, November.
    3. Meet Satishbhai Sonani & Atta Badii & Armin Moin, 2025. "Stock Price Prediction Using a Hybrid LSTM-GNN Model: Integrating Time-Series and Graph-Based Analysis," Papers 2502.15813, arXiv.org.
    4. Nicolas Ettlin & Walter Farkas & Andreas Kull & Alexander Smirnow, 2020. "Optimal Risk-Sharing Across a Network of Insurance Companies," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 20-52, Swiss Finance Institute.
    5. Seyed Javad Hashemi & Faisal Khan & Salim Ahmed, 2019. "An Insurance Model for Risk Management of Process Facilities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 713-728, March.
    6. Felix-Benedikt Liebrich & Gregor Svindland, 2019. "Risk sharing for capital requirements with multidimensional security markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 925-973, October.
    7. Brandtner, Mario & Kürsten, Wolfgang & Rischau, Robert, 2018. "Entropic risk measures and their comparative statics in portfolio selection: Coherence vs. convexity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 707-716.
    8. Osmundsen, Kjartan Kloster, 2018. "Using expected shortfall for credit risk regulation," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 80-93.
    9. A. Ahmadi-Javid, 2012. "Entropic Value-at-Risk: A New Coherent Risk Measure," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 1105-1123, December.
    10. Daron Acemoglu & Asuman Ozdaglar & Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi, 2015. "Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(2), pages 564-608, February.
    11. Sebastian Letmathe & Yuanhua Feng & André Uhde, . "Semiparametric GARCH models with long memory applied to value-at-risk and expected shortfall," Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
    12. Acerbi, Carlo & Tasche, Dirk, 2002. "On the coherence of expected shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1487-1503, July.
    13. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Risk sharing under the dominant peer‐to‐peer property and casualty insurance business models," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2021020, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    14. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wong, Bernard, 2016. "Correlations Between Insurance Lines Of Business: An Illusion Or A Real Phenomenon? Some Methodological Considerations," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 225-263, May.
    15. Andreas Haier & Ilya Molchanov & Michael Schmutz, 2015. "Intragroup transfers, intragroup diversification and their risk assessment," Papers 1511.06320, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2016.
    16. Clemente, Gian Paolo & Cornaro, Alessandra, 2022. "A multilayer approach for systemic risk in the insurance sector," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Fabio Caccioli & Paolo Barucca & Teruyoshi Kobayashi, 2018. "Network models of financial systemic risk: a review," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 81-114, January.
    18. Andreas Haier & Ilya Molchanov & Michael Schmutz, 2016. "Intragroup transfers, intragroup diversification and their risk assessment," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 363-392, December.
    19. Michel Denuit & Christian Y. Robert, 2021. "Risk sharing under the dominant peer‐to‐peer property and casualty insurance business models," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(2), pages 181-205, June.
    20. Ettlin, Nicolas & Farkas, Walter & Kull, Andreas & Smirnow, Alexander, 2020. "Optimal risk-sharing across a network of insurance companies," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 39-47.
    21. Michel Denuit & Christian Y. Robert, 2021. "Risk sharing under the dominant peer‐to‐peer property and casualty insurance business models," Post-Print hal-04854617, HAL.
    22. Kaluszka, Marek, 2001. "Optimal reinsurance under mean-variance premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 61-67, February.
    23. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    24. Centeno, Maria de Lourdes, 2002. "Measuring the effects of reinsurance by the adjustment coefficient in the Sparre Anderson model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 37-49, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ettlin, Nicolas & Farkas, Walter & Kull, Andreas & Smirnow, Alexander, 2020. "Optimal risk-sharing across a network of insurance companies," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 39-47.
    2. Feng, Runhuan & Liu, Ming & Zhang, Ning, 2024. "A unified theory of decentralized insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 157-178.
    3. Kull, Andreas, 2009. "Sharing Risk – An Economic Perspective," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 591-613, November.
    4. Tim J. Boonen & Kenneth Tsz Hin Ng & Tak Wa Ng & Thai Nguyen, 2026. "Pareto and Bowley Reinsurance Games in Peer-to-Peer Insurance," Papers 2602.14223, arXiv.org.
    5. Heather N. Fogarty & Sooie-Hoe Loke & Nicholas F. Marshall & Enrique A. Thomann, 2026. "Optimal Risk-Sharing Rules in Network-based Decentralized Insurance," Papers 2602.05155, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    6. Darko Medved, 2025. "Dynamic pricing and solvency of peer-to-peer insurance: a framework for transparency, risk sharing, and financial sustainability," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Miwaka Yamashita, 2025. "Risk Measure Examination for Large Losses," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Marcelo Brutti Righi & Paulo Sergio Ceretta, 2015. "Shortfall Deviation Risk: An alternative to risk measurement," Papers 1501.02007, arXiv.org, revised May 2016.
    9. Brandtner, Mario & Kürsten, Wolfgang & Rischau, Robert, 2018. "Entropic risk measures and their comparative statics in portfolio selection: Coherence vs. convexity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 707-716.
    10. Michel Denuit & Jan Dhaene & Christian Y. Robert, 2022. "Risk‐sharing rules and their properties, with applications to peer‐to‐peer insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(3), pages 615-667, September.
    11. Chi, Yichun & Liu, Fangda, 2017. "Optimal insurance design in the presence of exclusion clauses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 185-195.
    12. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2023. "From risk reduction to risk elimination by conditional mean risk sharing of independent losses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 46-59.
    13. Gao, Suhao & Yu, Zhen, 2023. "Parametric expectile regression and its application for premium calculation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 242-256.
    14. Denuit, Michel & Robert, Christian Y., 2023. "Endowment contingency funds for mutual aid and public financing," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2023009, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    15. Brandtner, Mario & Kürsten, Wolfgang & Rischau, Robert, 2020. "Beyond expected utility: Subjective risk aversion and optimal portfolio choice under convex shortfall risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1114-1126.
    16. Dragos Gorduza & Xiaowen Dong & Stefan Zohren, 2022. "Understanding stock market instability via graph auto-encoders," Papers 2212.04974, arXiv.org.
    17. Bogdan DIMA & Lucian Liviu ALBU & Ştefana Maria DIMA & Roxana IOAN & Anca SARAOLU IONAŞCUŢI & Marian Ilie SIMINICA, 2025. "Dynamic Conditional Correlations and Risk Spread between International Financial Markets: A DCC-Garch Analysis," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 5-22, April.
    18. Nicola Loperfido & Tomer Shushi, 2023. "Optimal Portfolio Projections for Skew-Elliptically Distributed Portfolio Returns," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 143-166, October.
    19. Anand Deo, 2025. "EVT-Based Rate-Preserving Distributional Robustness for Tail Risk Functionals," Papers 2506.16230, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    20. Hwai-Chung Ho, 2022. "Forecasting the distribution of long-horizon returns with time-varying volatility," Papers 2201.07457, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:201:y:2025:i:p3:s0960077925013888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.