IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v185y2024ics0960077924007100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural analysis and the sum of nodes’ betweenness centrality in complex networks

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Qi
  • Deng, Ronghao
  • Ding, Kaixing
  • Li, Meizhu

Abstract

Structural analysis in the field of network science aims to uncover the hidden information embedded within the topological structure of complex networks. Betweenness centrality is a measure that quantifies a node’s influence on the overall network, based on the shortest paths between different pairs of nodes. This unique property of betweenness centrality allows it to capture more structural information than the commonly employed degree centrality, which is a fundamental characteristic of network structure. In this study, we demonstrate that the sum of nodes’ betweenness centralities (SBC) can be utilized as a novel structural index to reveal the underlying rules governing the growth of a network. Additionally, we have developed a method that combines K-shell decomposition and SBC analysis to investigate the growth rules that have shaped the evolution of static networks in the past. Our findings indicate that the Barabási–Albert model guides the network’s SBC to grow in a logarithmic fashion, whereas the Erdős–Rényi model leads to the convergence of SBC values. Interestingly, we also discover that the convergence or divergence of SBC within the k-shell-like decomposition of a static network can be used to distinguish between developed networks (where growth rules have reached saturation) and developing networks (still undergoing expansion). These results highlight the utility of SBC as a reasonable and effective index for the structural analysis of complex networks, providing insights into the rules governing their evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Qi & Deng, Ronghao & Ding, Kaixing & Li, Meizhu, 2024. "Structural analysis and the sum of nodes’ betweenness centrality in complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924007100
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077924007100
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian von Mering & Roland Krause & Berend Snel & Michael Cornell & Stephen G. Oliver & Stanley Fields & Peer Bork, 2002. "Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions," Nature, Nature, vol. 417(6887), pages 399-403, May.
    2. Dror Kenett & Shlomo Havlin, 2015. "Network science: a useful tool in economics and finance," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 14(2), pages 155-167, November.
    3. Elad Schneidman & Michael J. Berry & Ronen Segev & William Bialek, 2006. "Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7087), pages 1007-1012, April.
    4. Loet Leydesdorff, 2007. "Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(9), pages 1303-1319, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Qi & Li, Meizhu, 2022. "A betweenness structural entropy of complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Lin Zhang & Ronald Rousseau & Wolfgang Glänzel, 2016. "Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1257-1265, May.
    3. Su, Hsin-Ning & Moaniba, Igam M., 2017. "Investigating the dynamics of interdisciplinary evolution in technology developments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 12-23.
    4. Frid-Nielsen, Snorre Sylvester & Rubin, Olivier & Baekkeskov, Erik, 2019. "The state of social science research on antimicrobial resistance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Gao, Qiang & Liang, Zhentao & Wang, Ping & Hou, Jingrui & Chen, Xiuxiu & Liu, Manman, 2021. "Potential index: Revealing the future impact of research topics based on current knowledge networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    6. Youtao Xiang & Sumuya Borjigin, 2024. "High–low volatility spillover network between economic policy uncertainty and commodity futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 1295-1319, August.
    7. Rafols, Ismael & Leydesdorff, Loet & O’Hare, Alice & Nightingale, Paul & Stirling, Andy, 2012. "How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1262-1282.
    8. Lipovetsky, Stan, 2018. "Quantum paradigm of probability amplitude and complex utility in entangled discrete choice modeling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 62-73.
    9. Yalcin, Haydar & Daim, Tugrul & Moughari, Mahdieh Mokhtari & Mermoud, Alain, 2024. "Supercomputers and quantum computing on the axis of cyber security," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Gong, Jue & Wang, Gang-Jin & Zhou, Yang & Zhu, You & Xie, Chi & Foglia, Matteo, 2023. "Spreading of cross-market volatility information: Evidence from multiplex network analysis of volatility spillovers," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Ran Xu & Navid Ghaffarzadegan, 2018. "Neuroscience bridging scientific disciplines in health: Who builds the bridge, who pays for it?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1183-1204, November.
    12. Mark L Ioffe & Michael J Berry II, 2017. "The structured ‘low temperature’ phase of the retinal population code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, October.
    13. Raymundo das Neves Machado & Benjamín Vargas-Quesada & Jacqueline Leta, 2016. "Intellectual structure in stem cell research: exploring Brazilian scientific articles from 2001 to 2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 525-537, February.
    14. Lina Xu & Steven Dellaportas & Zhiqiang Yang & Jin Wang, 2023. "More on the relationship between interdisciplinary accounting research and citation impact," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4779-4803, December.
    15. Bilong Shen & Weimin Zheng & Kathleen M. Carley, 2018. "Urban Activity Mining Framework for Ride Sharing Systems Based on Vehicular Social Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 705-734, September.
    16. Katarína Bod’ová & Enikő Szép & Nicholas H Barton, 2021. "Dynamic maximum entropy provides accurate approximation of structured population dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Gaoran Chen & Wenqi Chen & Shaojie Qi & Daniel T. L. Shek, 2024. "Improving Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Bibliometric Analysis of Related Intervention Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-17, November.
    18. MohammadReza Zahedian & Mahsa Bagherikalhor & Andrey Trufanov & G. Reza Jafari, 2022. "Financial Crisis in the Framework of Non-zero Temperature Balance Theory," Papers 2202.03198, arXiv.org.
    19. Wei Wang & Dechao Ma & Fengzhi Wu & Mengxin Sun & Shuangqing Xu & Qiuyue Hua & Ziyuan Sun, 2023. "Exploring the Knowledge Structure and Hotspot Evolution of Greenwashing: A Visual Analysis Based on Bibliometrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-35, January.
    20. Shekhtman, Louis M. & Danziger, Michael M. & Havlin, Shlomo, 2016. "Recent advances on failure and recovery in networks of networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 28-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0960077924007100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.