IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v68y2025i5p687-698.html

Design-led innovation as a generative source of competitive advantage

Author

Listed:
  • Ward, Mark
  • Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy

Abstract

Firms need to reliably identify new sources of competitive advantage ex ante to mitigate the risk of obsolescence in response to changing environments. One approach to addressing this issue is design-led innovation (DLI), which integrates design thinking with strategic management. DLI offers a flexible framework to identify and exploit new opportunities for competitive differentiation. Identifying, formulating, and framing strategic problems drives the DLI process by acting as the catalyst to create knowledge and awareness of value-creation opportunities. This study offers a strategic-problem classification matrix based on a portfolio approach to identifying value-creation opportunities. Two practices are presented: (1) engaging in progressive problem-solving, and (2) employing DLI catalysts. These practices could potentially strengthen DLI’s application and transform it into a generative source of competitive advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Ward, Mark & Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy, 2025. "Design-led innovation as a generative source of competitive advantage," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 687-698.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:5:p:687-698
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2024.10.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681324001447
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.10.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Baer & Kurt T. Dirks & Jackson A. Nickerson, 2013. "Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation†," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 197-214, February.
    2. Marcel E. A. Weber & Mathieu C. D. P. Weggeman & Joan E. Van Aken, 2012. "Developing What Customers Really Need: Involving Customers In Innovations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-15.
    3. Jack A. Nickerson & Todd R. Zenger, 2004. "A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm—The Problem-Solving Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(6), pages 617-632, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnaldo Camuffo & Alfonso Gambardella & Andrea Pignataro, 2024. "Theory-Driven Strategic Management Decisions," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 382-396, December.
    2. Bijuan Zhong & Mona V. Makhija & Shad Morris, 2022. "Abstract Versus Concrete: How Managers’ Construal Influences Organizational Control Systems and Problem Solving," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 2322-2345, November.
    3. Xin Liu & Lin Zhang & Abhinav Gupta & Xiaoming Zheng & Changqi Wu, 2022. "Upper echelons and intra‐organizational learning: How executive narcissism affects knowledge transfer among business units," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(11), pages 2351-2381, November.
    4. Sai Yayavaram & Wei-Ru Chen, 2015. "Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: The moderating role of technological complexity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 377-396, March.
    5. Rogerio S. Victer, 2020. "Connectivity knowledge and the degree of structural formalization: a contribution to a contingency theory of organizational capability," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Joon Mahn Lee & Rahul Kapoor, 2017. "Complementarities and Coordination: Implications for Governance Mode and Performance of Multiproduct Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 931-946, October.
    7. Felipe A. Csaszar & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2016. "Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(10), pages 2031-2049, October.
    8. Ye Dai & Gukdo Byun & Fangsheng Ding, 2019. "The Direct and Indirect Impact of Gender Diversity in New Venture Teams on Innovation Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(3), pages 505-528, May.
    9. Eresia-Eke CE & Makore S, 2016. "Responsiveness to Knowledge and Organisational Performance of Listed-Companies in the Construction Sector," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(5), pages 82-90.
    10. Robert P. Bremner & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2022. "Organizing Form, Experimentation, and Performance: Innovation in the Nascent Civilian Drone Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1645-1674, July.
    11. Daniel Tzabbar & Alex Vestal, 2015. "Bridging the Social Chasm in Geographically Distributed R&D Teams: The Moderating Effects of Relational Strength and Status Asymmetry on the Novelty of Team Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 811-829, June.
    12. Taalbi, Josef, 2017. "What drives innovation? Evidence from economic history," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1437-1453.
    13. Wang Jin & Kristina McElheran, 2025. "Economies Before Scale: I.T. Strategy and Performance Dynamics of Young U.S. Businesses," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7449-7473, September.
    14. Devarakonda, S.V. & Goossen, Martin & Mulotte, Louis, 2024. "The allocation of resource control within the corporate structure: Evidence from post-acquisition patent reassignments," Other publications TiSEM 4e9af8a0-0e1c-4780-a24e-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Rahul Kapoor & Ron Adner, 2012. "What Firms Make vs. What They Know: How Firms' Production and Knowledge Boundaries Affect Competitive Advantage in the Face of Technological Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1227-1248, October.
    16. Popa, Simona & Soto-Acosta, Pedro & Perez-Gonzalez, Daniel, 2018. "An investigation of the effect of electronic business on financial performance of Spanish manufacturing SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 355-362.
    17. Nicolai J. Foss & Keld Laursen & Torben Pedersen, 2011. "Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 980-999, August.
    18. Victor Manuel Bennett & Ines Black & Todd Hall, 2024. "Market Segment, Organizational Form, and Information Technology Fit," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 38-57, March.
    19. Pollok, Patrick & Lüttgens, Dirk & Piller, Frank T., 2019. "Attracting solutions in crowdsourcing contests: The role of knowledge distance, identity disclosure, and seeker status," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 98-114.
    20. Paul Walker, 2010. "The (Non)Theory Of The Knowledge Firm," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 57(1), pages 1-32, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:5:p:687-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.