IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v65y2022i5p657-670.html

Prospecting non-fungible tokens in the digital economy: Stakeholders and ecosystem, risk and opportunity

Author

Listed:
  • Wilson, Kathleen Bridget
  • Karg, Adam
  • Ghaderi, Hadi

Abstract

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are a highly nascent and emerging phenomenon revolutionizing how digital assets are traded. NFTs embody immutable rights to unique digital assets such as digital art and collectibles and are represented as digital tokens that can be traded across marketplaces utilizing blockchain technologies. NFTs engender new ways to organize, consume, move, program, and store digital information and have experienced a rapid rise in various adaptations across art, sports, broadcasting, content creation, and tech-crypto businesses. In this article, we define NFTs and look at how they fit with blockchain and cryptocurrencies, how they are used by various industries, and the opportunities and risks they present. Our key contribution is a conceptual map of an initial NFT ecosystem. In doing so, we provide relational mapping between and among key stakeholders: content creators, core and related technical and business intermediaries, consumers, investors, and speculators. We also highlight implications for managers and tie them to conceptual exploration and exploitation frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilson, Kathleen Bridget & Karg, Adam & Ghaderi, Hadi, 2022. "Prospecting non-fungible tokens in the digital economy: Stakeholders and ecosystem, risk and opportunity," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 657-670.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:65:y:2022:i:5:p:657-670
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.10.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681321002019
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.10.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malhotra, Arvind & O’Neill, Hugh & Stowell, Porter, 2022. "Thinking strategically about blockchain adoption and risk mitigation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 159-171.
    2. Nicola Jones, 2021. "How scientists are embracing NFTs," Nature, Nature, vol. 594(7864), pages 481-482, June.
    3. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    4. Gautam Ahuja & Curba Morris Lampert, 2001. "Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 521-543, June.
    5. Dowling, Michael, 2022. "Fertile LAND: Pricing non-fungible tokens," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Hughes, Alex & Park, Andrew & Kietzmann, Jan & Archer-Brown, Chris, 2019. "Beyond Bitcoin: What blockchain and distributed ledger technologies mean for firms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 273-281.
    7. Anna Gerke & David Shilbury & Pamm Philipps & Adam Karg & Katie Rowe, 2017. "Sport Management in Australia. An Organisational Overview," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 537-538, December.
    8. Lee, Jei Young, 2019. "A decentralized token economy: How blockchain and cryptocurrency can revolutionize business," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 773-784.
    9. Chen, Yan, 2018. "Blockchain tokens and the potential democratization of entrepreneurship and innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 567-575.
    10. Jonathan Levie & Benyamin B. Lichtenstein, 2010. "A Terminal Assessment of Stages Theory: Introducing a Dynamic States Approach to Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(2), pages 317-350, March.
    11. Angelis, Jannis & Ribeiro da Silva, Elias, 2019. "Blockchain adoption: A value driver perspective," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 307-314.
    12. Dowling, Michael, 2022. "Is non-fungible token pricing driven by cryptocurrencies?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    13. Daniel A. Levinthal & James G. March, 1993. "The myopia of learning," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S2), pages 95-112, December.
    14. Morkunas, Vida J. & Paschen, Jeannette & Boon, Edward, 2019. "How blockchain technologies impact your business model," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 295-306.
    15. Henrich R. Greve, 2007. "‘Exploration and exploitation in product innovation’," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 16(5), pages 945-975, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Andrew & Wilson, Matthew & Robson, Karen & Demetis, Dionysios & Kietzmann, Jan, 2023. "Interoperability: Our exciting and terrifying Web3 future," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 529-541.
    2. Malhotra, Arvind & O’Neill, Hugh & Stowell, Porter, 2022. "Thinking strategically about blockchain adoption and risk mitigation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 159-171.
    3. Yuk Ming Tang & Ka Yin Chau, 2025. "Blockchain evolution and management theoretical (BEMT) model based on integrated semantic similarity and co-citation analysis for next generation service industry," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 475-494, June.
    4. Guktae Kim & Moon-Goo Huh, 2015. "Exploration and organizational longevity: The moderating role of strategy and environment," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 389-414, June.
    5. Deng, Xin & Ali, Hesham & Aboelkheir, Heba, 2025. "Unleashing creative potential: The role of stable institutional ownership in exploratory innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    6. Geraldine A. Wu, 2012. "The Effect of Going Public on Innovative Productivity and Exploratory Search," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 928-950, August.
    7. Annapoornima M. Subramanian & Moren Lévesque & Vareska van de Vrande, 2020. "“Pulling the Plug:” Time Allocation between Drug Discovery and Development Projects," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2851-2876, December.
    8. Xiao, Fenglong, 2022. "Non-competes and innovation: Evidence from medical devices," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    9. Na Zhang & Lu Cheng & Chao Sun & Julie Callaert & Bart Looy, 2023. "The role of inter- and intra-organisational networks in innovation: towards requisite variety," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 4117-4136, July.
    10. Xiao, Fenglong & Shen, Yinjie, 2024. "Wolves at the door to the unknown: Innovation search and hedge fund activism," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    11. Murray, Alex & Kim, Dennie & Combs, Jordan, 2023. "The promise of a decentralized internet: What is Web3 and how can firms prepare?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 191-202.
    12. Montecchi, Matteo & Plangger, Kirk & Etter, Michael, 2019. "It’s real, trust me! Establishing supply chain provenance using blockchain," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 283-293.
    13. Wu, Weiwei & Xiao, Ruicong, 2025. "Antecedent configurations toward technology search strategies in digital transformation: The joint impact of performance feedback, organizational slack and TMT regulatory focus," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Xiong, Jiwei & Wang, Tao & Yang, Haibin, 2024. "Innovation search after failure: The role of peers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    15. Bruno Cirillo & Stefano Brusoni & Giovanni Valentini, 2014. "The Rejuvenation of Inventors Through Corporate Spinouts," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1764-1784, December.
    16. Zhang, Feng & Jiang, Guohua & Cantwell, John A., 2015. "Subsidiary exploration and the innovative performance of large multinational corporations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 224-234.
    17. Avimanyu Datta, 2016. "Antecedents To Radical Innovations: A Longitudinal Look At Firms In The Information Technology Industry By Aggregation Of Patents," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-31, October.
    18. Gilsing, Victor & Nooteboom, Bart & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Duysters, Geert & van den Oord, Ad, 2008. "Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1717-1731, December.
    19. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    20. Shuwaikh, Fatima & Brintte, Souad & Khemiri, Sabrina, 2022. "The impact of dynamic ambidexterity on the performance of organizations: Evidence from corporate venture capital investing in North America," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 991-1009.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:65:y:2022:i:5:p:657-670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.