IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v386y2025ics0306261925002594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data-driven surrogate modeling for performance prediction and sensitivity analysis of transport properties in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers

Author

Listed:
  • Raman, K. Ashoke
  • Hammacher, Linus
  • Kungl, Hans
  • Karl, André
  • Jodat, Eva
  • Eichel, Rüdiger-A.
  • Karyofylli, Violeta

Abstract

Proton exchange membrane electrolytic cells (PEMEC) are complex multivariate electrochemical systems that have emerged as a prominent technology for generating green hydrogen. To reduce costs and accelerate the commercial deployment of PEMEC, it is crucial to develop accurate predictive models that enable to capture the inherent nonlinearities of PEM electrolyzers efficiently. Therefore, in this study, we develop data-based surrogate models for PEMEC with catalyst layers having high (supported) and low (unsupported) electronic conductivity using support vector regression, extreme gradient boosting and artificial neural networks machine learning techniques focusing on the system’s transport properties. These models are developed by using the datasets obtained from an analytical model and a physics-based one-dimensional numerical model of PEMEC. The dataset obtained from the one-dimensional model was split into datasets for supported and unsupported catalyst layers, based on the electronic conductivity of the anode catalyst. The performance prediction of these three models is evaluated and compared with physics-based modeling results. We find that both artificial neural network (ANN) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) models perform well in predicting the cell current density. Therefore, the artificial neural network (ANN) model is selected to perform parametric analysis to investigate the effect of operating conditions and transport properties of the anode side. Both shapely additive explanations (SHAP) and sensitivity analysis reveal that the operating temperature is the most important parameter affecting the performance of the proton exchange membrane electrolytic cell. For supported catalyst layers, the influence of membrane thickness is greater than the catalyst’s electronic conductivity. However, in the case of unsupported catalysts layers, the SHAP values for electronic conductivity are found to be larger than membrane thickness.

Suggested Citation

  • Raman, K. Ashoke & Hammacher, Linus & Kungl, Hans & Karl, André & Jodat, Eva & Eichel, Rüdiger-A. & Karyofylli, Violeta, 2025. "Data-driven surrogate modeling for performance prediction and sensitivity analysis of transport properties in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:386:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925002594
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925002594
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khatib, F.N. & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Ijaodola, Oluwatosin & Ogungbemi, Emmanuel & El-Hassan, Zaki & Durrant, A. & Thompson, J. & Olabi, A.G., 2019. "Material degradation of components in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) electrolytic cell and mitigation mechanisms: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Amira Mohamed & Hatem Ibrahem & Rui Yang & Kibum Kim, 2022. "Optimization of Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer Cell Design Using Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Sutharssan, Thamo & Montalvao, Diogo & Chen, Yong Kang & Wang, Wen-Chung & Pisac, Claudia & Elemara, Hakim, 2017. "A review on prognostics and health monitoring of proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 440-450.
    4. Lee, Hye-One & Yesuraj, Johnbosco & Kim, Kibum, 2022. "Parametric study to optimize proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    5. Omer Faruk Noyan & Muhammad Mahmudul Hasan & Nezih Pala, 2023. "A Global Review of the Hydrogen Energy Eco-System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Chen, Xia & Rex, Alexander & Woelke, Janis & Eckert, Christoph & Bensmann, Boris & Hanke-Rauschenbach, Richard & Geyer, Philipp, 2024. "Machine learning in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis — A knowledge-integrated framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yuxuan & Li, Hongkun & Liu, Weiqun & Zhu, Qiao, 2024. "Optimization of membrane thickness for proton exchange membrane electrolyzer considering hydrogen production efficiency and hydrogen permeation phenomenon," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    2. Samuel Simon Araya & Fan Zhou & Simon Lennart Sahlin & Sobi Thomas & Christian Jeppesen & Søren Knudsen Kær, 2019. "Fault Characterization of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Xuexia Zhang & Zixuan Yu & Weirong Chen, 2019. "Life Prediction Based on D-S ELM for PEMFC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Yunlei Lin & Yuan Zhou, 2023. "Identification of Hydrogen-Energy-Related Emerging Technologies Based on Text Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Olabi, A.G. & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2021. "Fuel cell application in the automotive industry and future perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Chen, Kui & Badji, Abderrezak & Laghrouche, Salah & Djerdir, Abdesslem, 2022. "Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells degradation prediction using multi-kernel relevance vector regression and whale optimization algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    7. Pei, Pucheng & Meng, Yining & Chen, Dongfang & Ren, Peng & Wang, Mingkai & Wang, Xizhong, 2023. "Lifetime prediction method of proton exchange membrane fuel cells based on current degradation law," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    8. Cheng, Hongxu & Luo, Hong & Wang, Xuefei & Bi, Da & Chang, Yue & Song, Jie, 2025. "Assessing the performance of gold-coated titanium bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis under variable photovoltaic inputs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    9. Li, Haolong & Chen, Qihong & Zhang, Liyan & Liu, Li & Xiao, Peng, 2023. "Degradation prediction of proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on the multi-inputs Bi-directional long short-term memory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    10. Marcelo Azevedo Benetti & Florin Iov, 2023. "A Novel Scheme to Allocate the Green Energy Transportation Costs—Application to Carbon Captured and Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Zou, Wei & Froning, Dieter & Shi, Yan & Lehnert, Werner, 2021. "Working zone for a least-squares support vector machine for modeling polymer electrolyte fuel cell voltage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Yang, Yang & Yu, Xiaoran & Zhu, Wenchao & Xie, Changjun & Zhao, Bo & Zhang, Leiqi & Shi, Ying & Huang, Liang & Zhang, Ruiming, 2023. "Degradation prediction of proton exchange membrane fuel cells with model uncertainty quantification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    13. Pan, Mingzhang & Pan, Chengjie & Li, Chao & Zhao, Jian, 2021. "A review of membranes in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Transport phenomena, performance and durability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    14. Mahyar Jahaninasab & Ehsan Taheran & S. Alireza Zarabadi & Mohammadreza Aghaei & Ali Rajabpour, 2023. "A Novel Approach for Reducing Feature Space Dimensionality and Developing a Universal Machine Learning Model for Coated Tubes in Cross-Flow Heat Exchangers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Chen, Dongfang & Pei, Pucheng & Meng, Yining & Ren, Peng & Li, Yuehua & Wang, Mingkai & Wang, Xizhong, 2022. "Novel extraction method of working condition spectrum for the lifetime prediction and energy management strategy evaluation of automotive fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    16. Zheng, Nan & Zhang, Hanfei & Duan, Liqiang & Wang, Qiushi & Bischi, Aldo & Desideri, Umberto, 2023. "Techno-economic analysis of a novel solar-driven PEMEC-SOFC-based multi-generation system coupled parabolic trough photovoltaic thermal collector and thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    17. Makhsoos, Ashkan & Kandidayeni, Mohsen & Boulon, Loïc & Pollet, Bruno G., 2023. "A comparative analysis of single and modular proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers for green hydrogen production- a case study in Trois-Rivières," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    18. Li, Yanbing & Ma, Jiayue & Pan, Rui & Wang, Ting, 2024. "Hydrogen production from Fraxinus mandshurica solid wood waste using FeCl3 as a non-precious metal Lewis acid catalyst: A comprehensive utilization approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    19. Yang, Jibin & Chen, Li & Zhang, Bo & Zhang, Han & Chen, Bo & Wu, Xiaohua & Deng, Pengyi & Xu, Xiaohui, 2025. "Remaining useful life prediction for vehicle-oriented PEMFCs based on organic gray neural network considering the influence of dual energy source synergy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    20. Niu, Tong & Li, Yu & Zhang, Caizhi & Hu, Xiaosong & Wang, Gucheng & Li, Yuehua & Zeng, Tao & Wei, Zhongbao, 2024. "Prediction of fuel cell degradation trends using long short term memory optimization algorithm based on four-module experimental reactor validation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PC).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:386:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925002594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.