IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v384y2025ics0306261925001953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Well-to-wake cost and emissions assessments for the Western Australia–East Asia green shipping corridor

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas, Christopher M.
  • Shanbhogue, Santosh
  • Ghoniem, Ahmed
  • Zang, Guiyan

Abstract

The maritime sector, responsible for approximately 3% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, faces mounting pressure to decarbonize. In response, international “green shipping corridor” agreements have emerged as a prospective strategy to stimulate low-carbon shipping through incentives designed to hedge key stakeholders, catalyze new technologies, develop robust supply chains, and assess trade-offs. This study evaluates decarbonization pathways for the recently-proposed green corridor for iron ore shipping between Western Australia (WA) and East Asia (EA). Using comparative techno-economic analysis (TEA) and attributional life-cycle assessment (LCA) consistent with Resolution MEPC.391(81) adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in March 2024, we identify the most promising technical approaches to reduce the well-to-wake (WtW) GHG emissions of the current fossil-powered fleet while maintaining the competitiveness of the WA–EA iron ore corridor. A representative vessel, cargo, and voyage profile, based on the current bulk carrier fleet, is used to compare the total cost of ownership (TCO) and WtW GHG emissions among conventional and alternative options. We consider a 20 PJ/yr-scale deployment (in terms of lower heating value) of alternative energy carriers including “green” hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol fuels synthesized using wind energy and renewable CO2 resources in Australia. In line with MEPC.391(81), the analysis models the GHG emissions and costs throughout the fuel life cycle, including the production, transportation, densification, storage, bunkering, and end-use stages. Principal energy converters evaluated include internal combustion engines (ICEs) and electric motors (EMs) powered by fuel cells (FCs) or batteries, with all ICE options designed with selective catalytic reduction (SCR) to comply with IMO Tier II or Tier III NOx emissions standards. Compared to earlier efforts, the present powertrain model is significantly more detailed in regards to dynamic loads, fuel consumption and GHG emissions, and NOx abatement tradeoffs. The main results indicate that renewable ammonia ICE-powered vessels offer the lowest green premium, with a TCO 46% higher than conventional fuel oil vessels and 92% lower WtW GHG emissions in the baseline case without policy incentives. The study also finds that the capacity of iron ore bulk carriers, which are restricted more by cargo weight than volume, is minimally affected by the reduced energy density of alternative liquid fuels. Nonetheless, the representative scenario shows a high carbon abatement cost of $247 (USD) per tonne of CO2-equivalent. Such costs lie well above the typical $50-$100 range of proposed carbon taxes, highlighting the economic gap that must be addressed to realize such GHG emissions reductions within the WA–EA green corridor.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas, Christopher M. & Shanbhogue, Santosh & Ghoniem, Ahmed & Zang, Guiyan, 2025. "Well-to-wake cost and emissions assessments for the Western Australia–East Asia green shipping corridor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:384:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925001953
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925001953
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bilgili, Levent, 2021. "Comparative assessment of alternative marine fuels in life cycle perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Jessica Kersey & Natalie D. Popovich & Amol A. Phadke, 2022. "Rapid battery cost declines accelerate the prospects of all-electric interregional container shipping," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 664-674, July.
    3. Yang, Christopher & Ogden, Joan M, 2007. "Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1804p4vw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Michael A. Giovanniello & Anna N. Cybulsky & Tim Schittekatte & Dharik S. Mallapragada, 2024. "The influence of additionality and time-matching requirements on the emissions from grid-connected hydrogen production," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 9(2), pages 197-207, February.
    5. Arpagaus, Cordin & Bless, Frédéric & Uhlmann, Michael & Schiffmann, Jürg & Bertsch, Stefan S., 2018. "High temperature heat pumps: Market overview, state of the art, research status, refrigerants, and application potentials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 985-1010.
    6. Yang, Christopher & Ogden, Joan M, 2007. "Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7p3500g2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    7. Xinyi Zhou & Tie Li & Run Chen & Yijie Wei & Xinran Wang & Ning Wang & Shiyan Li & Min Kuang & Wenming Yang, 2024. "Ammonia marine engine design for enhanced efficiency and reduced greenhouse gas emissions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Perčić, Maja & Vladimir, Nikola & Fan, Ailong, 2021. "Techno-economic assessment of alternative marine fuels for inland shipping in Croatia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    9. Mikhail Sofiev & James J. Winebrake & Lasse Johansson & Edward W. Carr & Marje Prank & Joana Soares & Julius Vira & Rostislav Kouznetsov & Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen & James J. Corbett, 2018. "Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Kanchiralla, Fayas Malik & Brynolf, Selma & Olsson, Tobias & Ellis, Joanne & Hansson, Julia & Grahn, Maria, 2023. "How do variations in ship operation impact the techno-economic feasibility and environmental performance of fossil-free fuels? A life cycle study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    12. Korberg, A.D. & Brynolf, S. & Grahn, M. & Skov, I.R., 2021. "Techno-economic assessment of advanced fuels and propulsion systems in future fossil-free ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    13. Harris, Kylee & Grim, R. Gary & Huang, Zhe & Tao, Ling, 2021. "A comparative techno-economic analysis of renewable methanol synthesis from biomass and CO2: Opportunities and barriers to commercialization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    14. Jin, Zhuoying & Mi, Shijie & Zhou, Dezhi & Zhu, Jizhen & Schirru, Andrea & Zhao, Wenbin & Qian, Yong & Lucchini, Tommaso & Lu, Xingcai, 2024. "Insights into the combustion characteristics, emission formation sources, and optimization strategy of an ammonia-diesel dual-fuel engine under high ammonia ratio conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    15. Kevin Capaldo & James J. Corbett & Prasad Kasibhatla & Paul Fischbeck & Spyros N. Pandis, 1999. "Effects of ship emissions on sulphur cycling and radiative climate forcing over the ocean," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6746), pages 743-746, August.
    16. Boris Stolz & Maximilian Held & Gil Georges & Konstantinos Boulouchos, 2022. "Techno-economic analysis of renewable fuels for ships carrying bulk cargo in Europe," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 203-212, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gray, Nathan & O'Shea, Richard & Smyth, Beatrice & Lens, Piet N.L. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2024. "An assessment of decarbonisation pathways for intercontinental deep-sea shipping using power-to-X fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).
    2. Ahmed, Shoaib & Li, Tie & Zhou, Xin Yi & Yi, Ping & Chen, Run, 2025. "Quantifying the environmental footprints of biofuels for sustainable passenger ship operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    3. Ahmed, Shoaib & Li, Tie & Yi, Ping & Chen, Run, 2023. "Environmental impact assessment of green ammonia-powered very large tanker ship for decarbonized future shipping operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Perčić, Maja & Frković, Lovro & Pukšec, Tomislav & Ćosić, Boris & Li, Oi Lun & Vladimir, Nikola, 2022. "Life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost assessment of power batteries for all-electric vessels for short-sea navigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    5. Kanchiralla, Fayas Malik & Brynolf, Selma & Olsson, Tobias & Ellis, Joanne & Hansson, Julia & Grahn, Maria, 2023. "How do variations in ship operation impact the techno-economic feasibility and environmental performance of fossil-free fuels? A life cycle study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    6. Yan, Xinping & He, Yapeng & Fan, Ailong, 2023. "Carbon footprint prediction considering the evolution of alternative fuels and cargo: A case study of Yangtze river ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Wang, Kai & Li, Zhongwei & Zhang, Rui & Ma, Ranqi & Huang, Lianzhong & Wang, Zhuang & Jiang, Xiaoli, 2025. "Computational fluid dynamics-based ship energy-saving technologies: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    8. Evers, V.H.M. & Kirkels, A.F. & Godjevac, M., 2023. "Carbon footprint of hydrogen-powered inland shipping: Impacts and hotspots," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. Steven Jackson & Eivind Brodal, 2021. "Optimization of a Mixed Refrigerant Based H 2 Liquefaction Pre-Cooling Process and Estimate of Liquefaction Performance with Varying Ambient Temperature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    11. Solanki, Bhanupratap Singh & Lim, Hoyoung & Yoon, Seok Jun & Ham, Hyung Chul & Park, Han Saem & Lee, Ha Eun & Lee, See Hoon, 2025. "Recent advancement of non-noble metal catalysts for hydrogen production by NH3 decomposition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    12. Becker, W.L. & Braun, R.J. & Penev, M. & Melaina, M., 2012. "Production of Fischer–Tropsch liquid fuels from high temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 99-115.
    13. Chang, Le & Li, Zheng & Gao, Dan & Huang, He & Ni, Weidou, 2007. "Pathways for hydrogen infrastructure development in China: Integrated assessment for vehicle fuels and a case study of Beijing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2023-2037.
    14. Lin, Zhenhong & Fan, Yueyue & Ogden, Joan M & Chen, Chien-Wei, 2008. "Optimized Pathways for Regional H2 Infrastructure Transitions: A Case Study for Southern California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9mk5n8jn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    15. Li, Yuwan & Yuen, Kum Fai & Zhou, Yusheng, 2024. "Risk assessment of achieving greenhouse gas emission reduction target in the maritime industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 29-46.
    16. Yongxi Huang & Yueyue Fan & Nils Johnson, 2010. "Multistage System Planning for Hydrogen Production and Distribution," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 455-472, December.
    17. Niermann, M. & Timmerberg, S. & Drünert, S. & Kaltschmitt, M., 2021. "Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers and alternatives for international transport of renewable hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Li Chin Law & Epaminondas Mastorakos & Stephen Evans, 2022. "Estimates of the Decarbonization Potential of Alternative Fuels for Shipping as a Function of Vessel Type, Cargo, and Voyage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Hoffmann, Maximilian & Priesmann, Jan & Nolting, Lars & Praktiknjo, Aaron & Kotzur, Leander & Stolten, Detlef, 2021. "Typical periods or typical time steps? A multi-model analysis to determine the optimal temporal aggregation for energy system models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    20. Olfa Tlili & Christine Mansilla & Jochen Linβen & Markus Reuss & Thomas Grube & Martin Robinius & Jean André & Yannick Perez & Alain Le Duigou & Detlef Stolten, 2020. "Geospatial modelling of the hydrogen infrastructure in France in order to identify the most suited supply chains," Post-Print hal-02421359, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:384:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925001953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.