IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v380y2025ics0306261924023894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative techno-economic analysis of market models for peer-to-peer energy trading on a distributed platform

Author

Listed:
  • Galici, Marco
  • Troncia, Matteo
  • Nour, Morsy
  • Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo
  • Pilo, Fabrizio

Abstract

Since the emergence of distributed energy resources, local electricity markets have garnered interest for energy sharing on a community scale through both centralized and distributed models, including innovative distributed platforms. Numerous studies and initiatives have demonstrated that local markets and peer-to-peer transactions can be effective for electricity networks under specific conditions. Amidst the growing exploration of local market models, there is a noticeable gap in quantitative techno-economic analyses comparing different auction mechanisms. This paper aims at filling this gap by representing a comparative analysis of the most commonly implemented double-sided market models for peer-to-peer transactions based on a distributed ledger implementation. The comparison is based on quantitative key performance indicators designed to assess the economic and technical performance of these market models, including technical constraints within the power system through a network constraints management market. According to the selected metrics, the simulation results reveal that no single model outperforms all others. The authors conclude that, under the tested application and assumed conditions, the distributed market using distributed ledger technology faces several challenges that hinder its efficient application to local energy trading.

Suggested Citation

  • Galici, Marco & Troncia, Matteo & Nour, Morsy & Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo & Pilo, Fabrizio, 2025. "Comparative techno-economic analysis of market models for peer-to-peer energy trading on a distributed platform," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 380(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:380:y:2025:i:c:s0306261924023894
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924023894
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farmer, J. Doyne & Axtell, Robert L., 2022. "Agent-Based Modeling in Economics and Finance: Past, Present, and Future," INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-10, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    2. Shama Naz Islam, 2024. "A Review of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Markets: Enabling Models and Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Matteo Troncia & Marco Galici & Mario Mureddu & Emilio Ghiani & Fabrizio Pilo, 2019. "Distributed Ledger Technologies for Peer-to-Peer Local Markets in Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Hani Muhsen & Adib Allahham & Ala’aldeen Al-Halhouli & Mohammed Al-Mahmodi & Asma Alkhraibat & Musab Hamdan, 2022. "Business Model of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading: A Review of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng Wang & Chuwen Wang & Shirong Zeng & Jianguo Liu & Changjun Jiang, 2025. "Advanced simulation paradigm of human behaviour unveils complex financial systemic projection," Papers 2503.20787, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    2. Denis Koshelev & Alexey Ponomarenko & Sergei Seleznev, 2023. "Amortized neural networks for agent-based model forecasting," Papers 2308.05753, arXiv.org.
    3. Wang, Juan & Zheng, Junjun & Yu, Liukai & Goh, Mark & Tang, Yunying & Huang, Yongchao, 2023. "Distributed Reputation-Distance iterative auction system for Peer-To-Peer power trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    4. Alicia Vidler & Toby Walsh, 2024. "Modelling Opaque Bilateral Market Dynamics in Financial Trading: Insights from a Multi-Agent Simulation Study," Papers 2405.02849, arXiv.org.
    5. Namid R. Stillman & Rory Baggott, 2024. "Neuro-Symbolic Traders: Assessing the Wisdom of AI Crowds in Markets," Papers 2410.14587, arXiv.org.
    6. Chun Xia-Bauer & Florin Vondung & Stefan Thomas & Raphael Moser, 2022. "Business Model Innovations for Renewable Energy Prosumer Development in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Marco Galici & Mario Mureddu & Emilio Ghiani & Fabrizio Pilo, 2022. "Blockchain-Based Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation of a Decentralized Controller for Local Energy Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Maarten Wolsink, 2020. "Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-31, June.
    9. Sara Khan & Uzma Amin & Ahmed Abu-Siada, 2024. "P2P Energy Trading of EVs Using Blockchain Technology in Centralized and Decentralized Networks: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Hosszú, Zsuzsanna & Borsos, András & Mérő, Bence & Vágó, Nikolett, 2025. "The optimal choice of scaling in economic agent-based models," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    11. Namid R. Stillman & Rory Baggott & Justin Lyon & Jianfei Zhang & Dingqiu Zhu & Tao Chen & Perukrishnen Vytelingum, 2023. "Deep Calibration of Market Simulations using Neural Density Estimators and Embedding Networks," Papers 2311.11913, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    12. Richiardi, Matteo & Bronka, Patryk & van de Ven, Justin, 2023. "Back to the future: Agent-based modelling and dynamic microsimulation," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA8/23, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    13. Nicolas Cofre & Magdalena Mosionek-Schweda, 2023. "A simulated electronic market with speculative behaviour and bubble formation," Papers 2311.12247, arXiv.org.
    14. Michele Vodret & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Bence Tóth & Michael Benzaquen, 2023. "Microfounding GARCH models and beyond: a Kyle-inspired model with adaptive agents," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 18(3), pages 599-625, July.
    15. Abigail Devereaux, 2025. "Costs of choice: reformulating price theory without heroic assumptions," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 455-481, March.
    16. Aldo Glielmo & Marco Favorito & Debmallya Chanda & Domenico Delli Gatti, 2023. "Reinforcement Learning for Combining Search Methods in the Calibration of Economic ABMs," Papers 2302.11835, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    17. Sid-Ali Amamra, 2025. "A Hybrid Blockchain Solution for Electric Vehicle Energy Trading: Balancing Proof of Work and Proof of Stake," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-26, April.
    18. Zheyuan Sun & Sara Tavakoli & Kaveh Khalilpour & Alexey Voinov & Jonathan Paul Marshall, 2024. "Barriers to Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Networks: A Multi-Dimensional PESTLE Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.
    19. repec:osf:socarx:d8jkt_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Aleksei Pastushkov, 2024. "Market efficiency, informational asymmetry and pseudo-collusion of adaptively learning agents," Papers 2411.05032, arXiv.org.
    21. Luca Grilli & Domenico Santoro, 2022. "Forecasting financial time series with Boltzmann entropy through neural networks," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 665-681, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:380:y:2025:i:c:s0306261924023894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.