IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v359y2024ics0306261924000539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated sustainability assessment of repurposing onshore abandoned wells for geothermal power generation

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Jingyi
  • Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
  • Stamford, Laurence

Abstract

As global efforts intensify to mitigate climate change through Net-Zero by 2050, the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is of utmost importance. Within this context, geothermal power generation is an underestimated yet rapidly developing field with immense potential. A notable opportunity arises from repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells (AOGWs) as alternative sources for geothermal power production. This study employs multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to examine the techno-sustainability of four geothermal power systems: i) a business-as-usual geothermal power plant (GEObau), ii) repurpose two completely AOGWs for geothermal power generation (R-GEOdouble), iii) repurpose a single completely AOGW (R-GEOsingle), iv) repurpose semi-AOGWs (i.e., wells still in operation but with high water cut, R-GEOsemi). We assessed 30 criteria across technical, environmental, economic, and social dimensions via the analytical hierarchy process. The study identifies R-GEOsemi as the most techno-sustainable option due to its superior performance across environmental, economic, and social dimensions. However, GEObau closely follows R-GEOsemi, securing its position as the second-best option, marked by its outstanding technical proficiency and robust environmental and social performance. Conversely, R-GEOdouble and R-GEOsingle show limited techno-sustainability competitiveness. When sensitivity analyses are applied to the weighting factors, R-GEOsemi demonstrates resilience and remains as the best option in most cases. However, GEObau could outperform R-GEOsemi when the value of technical criteria is increased (weightings >0.255) or when the weightings for environmental or economic aspects decrease (weightings <0.236 and < 0.244 respectively). R-GEOdouble and R-GEOsingle only overtake GEObau when the economic aspect reaches a weighting of 0.659 or more. Despite R-GEOsemi being the most promising option, it faces challenges due to limited power generation capacity and the availability of wells approaching their end-of-lives. The findings underline the necessity for broader stakeholder input, inclusion of more technical and social criteria, and data-driven decision-making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Jingyi & Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro & Stamford, Laurence, 2024. "Integrated sustainability assessment of repurposing onshore abandoned wells for geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:359:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924000539
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924000539
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiangwen Xue & Qi Zhang & Xinyu Cai & Vadim V. Ponkratov, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Alternative Energy Sources in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    3. Dawo, Fabian & Fleischmann, Jonas & Kaufmann, Florian & Schifflechner, Christopher & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2021. "R1224yd(Z), R1233zd(E) and R1336mzz(Z) as replacements for R245fa: Experimental performance, interaction with lubricants and environmental impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    4. Ezbakhe, Fatine & Pérez-Foguet, Agustí, 2021. "Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 601-613.
    5. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Fan, B.Y. & Ouyang, M.G. & Zhao, Y. & Mu, Q.H., 2011. "Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3406-3418.
    6. Buonocore, Elvira & Vanoli, Laura & Carotenuto, Alberto & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2015. "Integrating life cycle assessment and emergy synthesis for the evaluation of a dry steam geothermal power plant in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 476-487.
    7. Bayer, Peter & Rybach, Ladislaus & Blum, Philipp & Brauchler, Ralf, 2013. "Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 446-463.
    8. Olasolo, P. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & D´Amico, Sebastiano & Liarte, I.A., 2016. "Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 133-144.
    9. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhao, Jun-Hong, 2009. "Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2263-2278, December.
    10. Yakup Çelikbilek & Fatih Tüysüz, 2020. "An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 281-300, April.
    11. Korhonen, Jouni & Honkasalo, Antero & Seppälä, Jyri, 2018. "Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 37-46.
    12. Macenić, M. & Kurevija, T. & Medved, I., 2020. "Novel geothermal gradient map of the Croatian part of the Pannonian Basin System based on data interpretation from 154 deep exploration wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    13. Zhao, Jin & Patwary, Ataul Karim & Qayyum, Abdul & Alharthi, Majed & Bashir, Furrukh & Mohsin, Muhammad & Hanif, Imran & Abbas, Qaiser, 2022. "The determinants of renewable energy sources for the fueling of green and sustainable economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    14. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    15. Pambudi, Nugroho Agung, 2018. "Geothermal power generation in Indonesia, a country within the ring of fire: Current status, future development and policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2893-2901.
    16. Marinakis, Vangelis & Doukas, Haris & Xidonas, Panos & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2017. "Multicriteria decision support in local energy planning: An evaluation of alternative scenarios for the Sustainable Energy Action Plan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-16.
    17. Soltani, M. & Moradi Kashkooli, Farshad & Souri, Mohammad & Rafiei, Behnam & Jabarifar, Mohammad & Gharali, Kobra & Nathwani, Jatin S., 2021. "Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Turkson, Charles & Liu, Wenbin & Acquaye, Adolf, 2024. "A data envelopment analysis based evaluation of sustainable energy generation portfolio scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    2. Gkousis, Spiros & Welkenhuysen, Kris & Compernolle, Tine, 2022. "Deep geothermal energy extraction, a review on environmental hotspots with focus on geo-technical site conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Sigurjónsson, Hafþór Ægir & Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Bogason, Sigurður G., 2021. "A life-cycle analysis of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1076-1086.
    4. Pan, Shu-Yuan & Gao, Mengyao & Shah, Kinjal J. & Zheng, Jianming & Pei, Si-Lu & Chiang, Pen-Chi, 2019. "Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 19-32.
    5. He, Chao & Liu, Chao & Zhou, Mengtong & Xie, Hui & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Wu, Shuangying & Li, Yourong, 2014. "A new selection principle of working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle coupling with different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 283-291.
    6. Larsen, Ulrik & Pierobon, Leonardo & Haglind, Fredrik & Gabrielii, Cecilia, 2013. "Design and optimisation of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in marine applications using the principles of natural selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 803-812.
    7. Roberto Pili & Hartmut Spliethoff & Christoph Wieland, 2017. "Dynamic Simulation of an Organic Rankine Cycle—Detailed Model of a Kettle Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    10. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    11. Alklaibi, A.M. & Lior, N., 2021. "Waste heat utilization from internal combustion engines for power augmentation and refrigeration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Ni, Jiaxin & Zhao, Li & Zhang, Zhengtao & Zhang, Ying & Zhang, Jianyuan & Deng, Shuai & Ma, Minglu, 2018. "Dynamic performance investigation of organic Rankine cycle driven by solar energy under cloudy condition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 122-141.
    13. Yu, Haoshui & Gundersen, Truls & Feng, Xiao, 2018. "Process integration of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and heat pump for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 330-340.
    14. Janis Edmunds Daugavietis & Raimonda Soloha & Elina Dace & Jelena Ziemele, 2022. "A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods for Sustainability Assessment of District Heating Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    16. Oko, C.O.C. & Njoku, I.H., 2017. "Performance analysis of an integrated gas-, steam- and organic fluid-cycle thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 431-443.
    17. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    18. Piotr Kolasiński, 2019. "Application of the Multi-Vane Expanders in ORC Systems—A Review on the Experimental and Modeling Research Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    20. Colmenar-Santos, Antonio & Folch-Calvo, Martin & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & Borge-Diez, David, 2016. "The geothermal potential in Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 865-886.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:359:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924000539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.