IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v338y2023ics030626192300291x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plant and system-level performance of combined heat and power plants equipped with different carbon capture technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Kumar, Tharun Roshan
  • Beiron, Johanna
  • Biermann, Maximilian
  • Harvey, Simon
  • Thunman, Henrik

Abstract

Installing carbon capture and storage (BECCS) capability at existing biomass-fired combined heat and power (bio-CHP) plants with substantial emissions of biogenic CO2 could achieve significant quantities of the negative CO2 emissions required to meet climate targets. However, it is unclear which CO2 capture technology is optimal for extensive BECCS deployment in bio-CHP plants operating in district heating (DH) systems. This is in part due to inconsistent views regarding the perceived value of high-exergy energy carriers at the plant level and the extended energy system to which it belongs. This work evaluates how a bio-CHP plant in a DH system performs when equipped with CO2 capture systems with inherently different exergy requirements per unit of CO2 captured from the flue gases. The analysis is based upon steady-state process models of the steam cycle of an existing biomass-fired CHP plant as well as two chemical absorption-based CO2 capture technologies that use hot potassium carbonate (HPC) and amine-based (monoethanolamine or MEA) solvents. The models were developed to quantify the plant energy and exergy performances, both at the plant and system levels. In addition, heat recovery from the CO2 capture and conditioning units was considered, as well as the possibility of integrating large-scale heat pumps into the plant or using domestic heat pumps within the local DH system. The results show that the HPC process has more recoverable excess heat (∼0.99 MJ/kgCO2,captured) than the MEA process (0.58 MJ/kgCO2,captured) at temperature levels suitable for district heating, which is consistent with values reported in previous similar comparative studies. However, using energy performance within the plant boundary as a figure of merit is biased in favor of the HPC process. Considering heat and power, the energy efficiency of the bio-CHP plant fitted with HPC and MEA are estimated to be 90% and 76%, respectively. Whereas considering exergy performance within the plant boundary, the analysis emphasizes the significant advantage the amine-based capture process has over the HPC process. Higher exergy efficiency for the CHP plant with the MEA capture process (∼35%) compared to the plant with the HPC process (∼26%) implies a relatively superior ability of the plant to adapt its product output, i.e., heat and power production, and negative-CO2 emissions. Furthermore, advanced amine solvents allow the BECCS plant to capture well beyond 90% of its total CO2 emissions with relatively low increased specific heat demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Kumar, Tharun Roshan & Beiron, Johanna & Biermann, Maximilian & Harvey, Simon & Thunman, Henrik, 2023. "Plant and system-level performance of combined heat and power plants equipped with different carbon capture technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:338:y:2023:i:c:s030626192300291x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192300291X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Itf, 2022. "Carbon Pricing in Shipping," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 110, OECD Publishing.
    2. Jonathan T. Hawkins-Pierot & Katherine R. H. Wagner, 2022. "Technology Lock-In and Optimal Carbon Pricing," CESifo Working Paper Series 9762, CESifo.
    3. Song Li & Gergő Thiering & Péter Udvarhelyi & Viktor Ivády & Adam Gali, 2022. "Carbon defect qubit in two-dimensional WS2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    4. Mei, Dexiang & Zhao, Chenchen & Luo, Qin & Li, Yan, 2022. "Forecasting the Chinese low-carbon index volatility," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Gadd, Henrik & Werner, Sven, 2014. "Achieving low return temperatures from district heating substations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 59-67.
    6. Levihn, Fabian, 2017. "CHP and heat pumps to balance renewable power production: Lessons from the district heating network in Stockholm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 670-678.
    7. Kühne, Kjell & Bartsch, Nils & Tate, Ryan Driskell & Higson, Julia & Habet, André, 2022. "“Carbon Bombs” - Mapping key fossil fuel projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    8. Werner, Sven, 2017. "District heating and cooling in Sweden," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 419-429.
    9. Khan M. R. Taufique & Kristian S. Nielsen & Thomas Dietz & Rachael Shwom & Paul C. Stern & Michael P. Vandenbergh, 2022. "Revisiting the promise of carbon labelling," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(2), pages 132-140, February.
    10. Tobias Pröll & Florian Zerobin, 2019. "Biomass-based negative emission technology options with combined heat and power generation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 1307-1324, October.
    11. Yilong Wang & Xuhui Wang & Kai Wang & Frédéric Chevallier & Dan Zhu & Jinghui Lian & Yue He & Hanqin Tian & Junsheng Li & Jianxiao Zhu & Sujong Jeong & Josep G. Canadell, 2022. "The size of the land carbon sink in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 603(7901), pages 7-9, March.
    12. Li, Guohui & Ning, Zhiyuan & Yang, Hong & Gao, Lipeng, 2022. "A new carbon price prediction model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    13. Foster Kofi Ayittey & Christine Ann Obek & Agus Saptoro & Kumar Perumal & Mee Kee Wong, 2020. "Process modifications for a hot potassium carbonate‐based CO2 capture system: a comparative study," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 130-146, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amrita Goldar & Diya Dasgupta, 2023. "Beyond the Stocktake (Part II): Clean Energy Technologies," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Policy Paper 14, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
    2. Michael-Allan Millar & Bruce Elrick & Greg Jones & Zhibin Yu & Neil M. Burnside, 2020. "Roadblocks to Low Temperature District Heating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Danica Djurić Ilić, 2020. "Classification of Measures for Dealing with District Heating Load Variations—A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Pasichnyi, Oleksii & Wallin, Jörgen & Kordas, Olga, 2019. "Data-driven building archetypes for urban building energy modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 360-377.
    5. Averfalk, Helge & Werner, Sven, 2020. "Economic benefits of fourth generation district heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Ma, Zheng & Knotzer, Armin & Billanes, Joy Dalmacio & Jørgensen, Bo Nørregaard, 2020. "A literature review of energy flexibility in district heating with a survey of the stakeholders’ participation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    7. Arabkoohsar, Ahmad & Alsagri, Ali Sulaiman, 2020. "Thermodynamic analysis of ultralow-temperature district heating system with shared power heat pumps and triple-pipes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Sernhed, Kerstin & Lygnerud, Kristina & Werner, Sven, 2018. "Synthesis of recent Swedish district heating research," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 126-132.
    9. Nguyen, Truong & Gustavsson, Leif & Dodoo, Ambrose & Tettey, Uniben Yao Ayikoe, 2020. "Implications of supplying district heat to a new urban residential area in Sweden," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    10. Kontu, K. & Rinne, S. & Junnila, S., 2019. "Introducing modern heat pumps to existing district heating systems – Global lessons from viable decarbonizing of district heating in Finland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 862-870.
    11. Østergaard, Dorte Skaarup & Smith, Kevin Michael & Tunzi, Michele & Svendsen, Svend, 2022. "Low-temperature operation of heating systems to enable 4th generation district heating: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    12. Li, Yemao & Xia, Jianjun & Su, Yingbo & Jiang, Yi, 2018. "Systematic optimization for the utilization of low-temperature industrial excess heat for district heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 984-991.
    13. Milad Khosravi & Ahmad Arabkoohsar, 2019. "Thermal-Hydraulic Performance Analysis of Twin-Pipes for Various Future District Heating Schemes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Hennessy, Jay & Li, Hailong & Wallin, Fredrik & Thorin, Eva, 2018. "Towards smart thermal grids: Techno-economic feasibility of commercial heat-to-power technologies for district heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 766-776.
    15. Giampieri, A. & Roy, S. & Shivaprasad, K.V. & Smallbone, A.J. & Roskilly, A.P., 2022. "An integrated smart thermo-chemical energy network," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Lund, Henrik & Duic, Neven & Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2018. "Future district heating systems and technologies: On the role of smart energy systems and 4th generation district heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 614-619.
    17. Antoine Reguis & Behrang Vand & John Currie, 2021. "Challenges for the Transition to Low-Temperature Heat in the UK: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, November.
    18. Shunji Kang & Zhi Shen & Xizhou Shen & Liuya Fang & Li Xiang & Wenze Yang, 2021. "Experimental investigation on CO2 desorption kinetics from MDEA + PZ and comparison with MDEA/MDEA + DEA aqueous solutions with thermo‐gravimetric analysis method," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(5), pages 974-987, October.
    19. Helistö, Niina & Kiviluoma, Juha & Morales-España, Germán & O’Dwyer, Ciara, 2021. "Impact of operational details and temporal representations on investment planning in energy systems dominated by wind and solar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    20. Khosravi, Fatemeh & Lowes, Richard & Ugalde-Loo, Carlos E., 2023. "Cooling is hotting up in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:338:y:2023:i:c:s030626192300291x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.