IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v336y2023ics0306261923001836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic bias in reanalysis-derived solar power profiles & the potential for error propagation in long duration energy storage studies

Author

Listed:
  • Mathews, Duncan
  • Ó Gallachóir, Brian
  • Deane, Paul

Abstract

This study consolidates the literature relating to the systematic bias of model-derived irradiance data and further characterises the same for ERA-5 and MERRA-2, two reanalysis datasets that are frequently used to model renewable power in energy system modelling studies. The bias errors yielded when modelling Solar PV generation for solar parks in Australia and Northern Ireland are compared under the optics of typically clear versus typically cloudy respective climates. Evidence is presented that MERRA-2 exhibits a significant global overestimation bias, contrary to some literature that suggests local variation and underestimation in some locations. Based on the trends identified, it is proposed that overestimation bias proliferates in more cloudy climates for both reanalysis datasets. The implications of such bias for studies involving long-duration energy storage with low round-trip efficiency are investigated and an unfortunate mechanism for error propagation is highlighted. A simplified power system consisting of wind, solar, and energy storage is modelled to demonstrate this effect with solar power profiles derived from metered generation, ERA-5, and MERRA-2. It shown that greater systematic bias of MERRA-2, in combination with the opportunity for error propagation through low-round trip efficiency, has the potential to significantly distort the charging & discharging pattern, overall utilization, and total energy requirement of long duration energy storage infrastructure. ERA-5, despite also exhibiting systematic bias, was better able to reproduce the simulated results of the metered generation scenario. Finally, it is recommended that energy modellers using MERRA-2 data to simulate solar PV outputs should now migrate to ERA-5 if reanalysis data is to be used.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathews, Duncan & Ó Gallachóir, Brian & Deane, Paul, 2023. "Systematic bias in reanalysis-derived solar power profiles & the potential for error propagation in long duration energy storage studies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:336:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923001836
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923001836
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd & Nea, 2022. "National legislative and regulatory activities," Nuclear Law Bulletin, OECD Publishing, vol. 2021(2).
    2. Sengupta, Manajit & Xie, Yu & Lopez, Anthony & Habte, Aron & Maclaurin, Galen & Shelby, James, 2018. "The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 51-60.
    3. Ruggles, Tyler H. & Caldeira, Ken, 2022. "Wind and solar generation may reduce the inter-annual variability of peak residual load in certain electricity systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    4. Yang, Dazhi, 2018. "A correct validation of the National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 152-155.
    5. Oecd & Nea, 2022. "National Legislative and Regulatory Activities," Nuclear Law Bulletin, OECD Publishing, vol. 2021(1).
    6. Kies, Alexander & Schyska, Bruno U. & Bilousova, Mariia & El Sayed, Omar & Jurasz, Jakub & Stoecker, Horst, 2021. "Critical review of renewable generation datasets and their implications for European power system models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Staffell, Iain & Pfenninger, Stefan, 2016. "Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1224-1239.
    8. Bett, Philip E. & Thornton, Hazel E., 2016. "The climatological relationships between wind and solar energy supply in Britain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 96-110.
    9. Steinke, Florian & Wolfrum, Philipp & Hoffmann, Clemens, 2013. "Grid vs. storage in a 100% renewable Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 826-832.
    10. Pfenninger, Stefan & Staffell, Iain, 2016. "Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1251-1265.
    11. Peng, Jinqing & Lu, Lin & Yang, Hongxing & Ma, Tao, 2015. "Validation of the Sandia model with indoor and outdoor measurements for semi-transparent amorphous silicon PV modules," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 316-323.
    12. Arash Khatibi & Stefan Krauter, 2021. "Validation and Performance of Satellite Meteorological Dataset MERRA-2 for Solar and Wind Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziad M. Ali & Martin Calasan & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem & Francisco Jurado & Foad H. Gandoman, 2023. "Applications of Energy Storage Systems in Enhancing Energy Management and Access in Microgrids: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-41, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Tong & David J. Farnham & Lei Duan & Qiang Zhang & Nathan S. Lewis & Ken Caldeira & Steven J. Davis, 2021. "Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Mads Raunbak & Timo Zeyer & Kun Zhu & Martin Greiner, 2017. "Principal Mismatch Patterns Across a Simplified Highly Renewable European Electricity Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Alexis Tantet & Marc Stéfanon & Philippe Drobinski & Jordi Badosa & Silvia Concettini & Anna Cretì & Claudia D’Ambrosio & Dimitri Thomopulos & Peter Tankov, 2019. "e 4 clim 1.0: The Energy for a Climate Integrated Model: Description and Application to Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-37, November.
    4. Bianchi, Emilio & Guozden, Tomás & Kozulj, Roberto, 2022. "Assessing low frequency variations in solar and wind power and their climatic teleconnections," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 560-571.
    5. Mayer, Martin János & Biró, Bence & Szücs, Botond & Aszódi, Attila, 2023. "Probabilistic modeling of future electricity systems with high renewable energy penetration using machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    6. Bhattacharya, Saptarshi & Pennock, Shona & Robertson, Bryson & Hanif, Sarmad & Alam, Md Jan E. & Bhatnagar, Dhruv & Preziuso, Danielle & O’Neil, Rebecca, 2021. "Timing value of marine renewable energy resources for potential grid applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    7. Narvaez, Gabriel & Giraldo, Luis Felipe & Bressan, Michael & Pantoja, Andres, 2021. "Machine learning for site-adaptation and solar radiation forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 333-342.
    8. Drücke, Jaqueline & Borsche, Michael & James, Paul & Kaspar, Frank & Pfeifroth, Uwe & Ahrens, Bodo & Trentmann, Jörg, 2021. "Climatological analysis of solar and wind energy in Germany using the Grosswetterlagen classification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1254-1266.
    9. Moraes, L. & Bussar, C. & Stoecker, P. & Jacqué, Kevin & Chang, Mokhi & Sauer, D.U., 2018. "Comparison of long-term wind and photovoltaic power capacity factor datasets with open-license," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 209-220.
    10. Pavičević, Matija & Mangipinto, Andrea & Nijs, Wouter & Lombardi, Francesco & Kavvadias, Konstantinos & Jiménez Navarro, Juan Pablo & Colombo, Emanuela & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2020. "The potential of sector coupling in future European energy systems: Soft linking between the Dispa-SET and JRC-EU-TIMES models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    11. de Guibert, Paul & Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2020. "Variable time-step: A method for improving computational tractability for energy system models with long-term storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    12. Marko Hočevar & Lovrenc Novak & Primož Drešar & Gašper Rak, 2022. "The Status Quo and Future of Hydropower in Slovenia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-13, September.
    13. Lukas Kriechbaum & Philipp Gradl & Romeo Reichenhauser & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Modelling Grid Constraints in a Multi-Energy Municipal Energy System Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Behrang Shirizadeh, Quentin Perrier, and Philippe Quirion, 2022. "How Sensitive are Optimal Fully Renewable Power Systems to Technology Cost Uncertainty?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    15. Gueymard, Christian A. & Bright, Jamie M. & Lingfors, David & Habte, Aron & Sengupta, Manajit, 2019. "A posteriori clear-sky identification methods in solar irradiance time series: Review and preliminary validation using sky imagers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 412-427.
    16. Liu, Hailiang & Andresen, Gorm Bruun & Greiner, Martin, 2018. "Cost-optimal design of a simplified highly renewable Chinese electricity network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 534-546.
    17. Géremi Gilson Dranka & Paula Ferreira, 2020. "Electric Vehicles and Biofuels Synergies in the Brazilian Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Hayes, Liam & Stocks, Matthew & Blakers, Andrew, 2021. "Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2022. "The importance of renewable gas in achieving carbon-neutrality: Insights from an energy system optimization model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    20. Liu, Hailiang & Brown, Tom & Andresen, Gorm Bruun & Schlachtberger, David P. & Greiner, Martin, 2019. "The role of hydro power, storage and transmission in the decarbonization of the Chinese power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1308-1321.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:336:y:2023:i:c:s0306261923001836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.