IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v315y2022ics0306261922002987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design, instrumentation, and operation of a standard downdraft, laboratory-scale gasification testbed utilising novel seed-propagated hybrid Miscanthus pellets

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Zakir
  • Kamble, Prashant
  • Reza Check, Gholam
  • DiLallo, Trevor
  • O'Sullivan, Willy
  • Turner, Ellen D.
  • Mackay, Andrew
  • Blanco-Sanchez, Paula
  • Yu, Xi
  • Bridgwater, Anthony
  • Paul McCalmont, Jon
  • Donnison, Iain
  • Watson, Ian

Abstract

Biomass gasification remains an attractive option to impact climate chaos; however, the technology presents challenges in tolerance to feedstock variability and tar production, which can limit the overall process efficiency, gasifier performance, durability and downstream syngas utilisation. The primary objectives of this study were to compare two gasifier design approaches using different reaction kinetics, based on multiple or singular oxidation and gasification reactions, and build and test a novel, flexible, laboratory-scale downdraft gasifier to convert pellets from UK hybrid Miscanthus into syngas, whilst deploying inexpensive instrumentation methods. The experimental gasification parameters studied were carbon conversion efficiency, gas yield, cold gas efficiency and gas heating values. The performance study shows that the system achieved good average temperature (842–866 °C) in the reduction zones for equivalence ratios between 0.25 and 0.35. The optimum values for carbon conversion efficiency, cold gas efficiency, heating values (HHV) of product gas and gas yield were 74%, 32%, 4.17 MJ/m3 and 1.32 m3/kg(biomass), respectively. The reported performance parameters for the new seed-propagated hybrid Miscanthus in the present study were comparable to those from conventional Miscanthus pellet gasification in downdraft gasifiers but these new hybrid varieties offer advantages in productivity over broader climatic regions compared to conventional varieties.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Zakir & Kamble, Prashant & Reza Check, Gholam & DiLallo, Trevor & O'Sullivan, Willy & Turner, Ellen D. & Mackay, Andrew & Blanco-Sanchez, Paula & Yu, Xi & Bridgwater, Anthony & Paul McCalmont, J, 2022. "Design, instrumentation, and operation of a standard downdraft, laboratory-scale gasification testbed utilising novel seed-propagated hybrid Miscanthus pellets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:315:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922002987
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922002987
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118864?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kallis, Kyriakos X. & Pellegrini Susini, Giacomo A. & Oakey, John E., 2013. "A comparison between Miscanthus and bioethanol waste pellets and their performance in a downdraft gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 333-340.
    2. Huiyuan Shi & Wen Si & Xi Li, 2016. "The Concept, Design and Performance of a Novel Rotary Kiln Type Air-Staged Biomass Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Lv, Pengmei & Yuan, Zhenhong & Ma, Longlong & Wu, Chuangzhi & Chen, Yong & Zhu, Jingxu, 2007. "Hydrogen-rich gas production from biomass air and oxygen/steam gasification in a downdraft gasifier," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(13), pages 2173-2185.
    4. Felten, Daniel & Fröba, Norbert & Fries, Jérôme & Emmerling, Christoph, 2013. "Energy balances and greenhouse gas-mitigation potentials of bioenergy cropping systems (Miscanthus, rapeseed, and maize) based on farming conditions in Western Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 160-174.
    5. Susastriawan, A.A.P. & Saptoadi, Harwin & Purnomo,, 2017. "Small-scale downdraft gasifiers for biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 989-1003.
    6. Sutar, Kailasnath B. & Kohli, Sangeeta & Ravi, M.R., 2017. "Design, development and testing of small downdraft gasifiers for domestic cookstoves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 447-460.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander N. Kozlov & Nikita V. Tomin & Denis N. Sidorov & Electo E. S. Lora & Victor G. Kurbatsky, 2020. "Optimal Operation Control of PV-Biomass Gasifier-Diesel-Hybrid Systems Using Reinforcement Learning Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Yepes Maya, Diego Mauricio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Andrade, Rubenildo Vieira & Ratner, Albert & Martínez Angel, Juan Daniel, 2021. "Biomass gasification using mixtures of air, saturated steam, and oxygen in a two-stage downdraft gasifier. Assessment using a CFD modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1014-1030.
    3. Cortazar, M. & Lopez, G. & Alvarez, J. & Amutio, M. & Bilbao, J. & Olazar, M., 2018. "Advantages of confining the fountain in a conical spouted bed reactor for biomass steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 455-463.
    4. Susastriawan, A.A.P. & Saptoadi, Harwin & Purnomo,, 2017. "Small-scale downdraft gasifiers for biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 989-1003.
    5. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Santana, Hortência E.P. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2022. "Development of a semi-empirical model for woody biomass gasification based on stoichiometric thermodynamic equilibrium model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    6. Upadhyay, Darshit S. & Sakhiya, Anil Kumar & Panchal, Krunal & Patel, Amar H. & Patel, Rajesh N., 2019. "Effect of equivalence ratio on the performance of the downdraft gasifier – An experimental and modelling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 833-846.
    7. Elsner, Witold & Wysocki, Marian & Niegodajew, Paweł & Borecki, Roman, 2017. "Experimental and economic study of small-scale CHP installation equipped with downdraft gasifier and internal combustion engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 213-227.
    8. Jaka Isgiyarta & Bambang Sudarmanta & Jalu Aji Prakoso & Eka Nur Jannah & Arif Rahman Saleh, 2022. "Micro-Grid Oil Palm Plantation Waste Gasification Power Plant in Indonesia: Techno-Economic and Socio-Environmental Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Díaz González, Carlos A. & Pacheco Sandoval, Leonardo, 2020. "Sustainability aspects of biomass gasification systems for small power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    10. AlNouss, Ahmed & McKay, Gordon & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2020. "Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    11. Sethu Sundar Pethaiah & Kishor Kumar Sadasivuni & Arunkumar Jayakumar & Deepalekshmi Ponnamma & Chandra Sekhar Tiwary & Gangadharan Sasikumar, 2020. "Methanol Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production Using Polymer Electrolyte Membrane: A Mini-Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Smoliński, A. & Howaniec, N. & Stańczyk, K., 2011. "A comparative experimental study of biomass, lignite and hard coal steam gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1836-1842.
    13. Yueshi Wu & Weihong Yang & Wlodzimierz Blasiak, 2014. "Energy and Exergy Analysis of High Temperature Agent Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Tera, Ibrahim & Zhang, Shengan & Liu, Guilian, 2024. "A conceptual hydrogen, heat and power polygeneration system based on biomass gasification, SOFC and waste heat recovery units: Energy, exergy, economic and emergy (4E) assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    15. Keller, Victor & Lyseng, Benjamin & English, Jeffrey & Niet, Taco & Palmer-Wilson, Kevin & Moazzen, Iman & Robertson, Bryson & Wild, Peter & Rowe, Andrew, 2018. "Coal-to-biomass retrofit in Alberta –value of forest residue bioenergy in the electricity system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 373-383.
    16. Gabbrielli, Roberto & Barontini, Federica & Frigo, Stefano & Bressan, Luigi, 2022. "Numerical analysis of bio-methane production from biomass-sewage sludge oxy-steam gasification and methanation process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    17. Martínez, Laura V. & Rubiano, Jairo E. & Figueredo, Manuel & Gómez, María F., 2020. "Experimental study on the performance of gasification of corncobs in a downdraft fixed bed gasifier at various conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1216-1226.
    18. Przybyla, Grzegorz & Szlek, Andrzej & Haggith, Dale & Sobiesiak, Andrzej, 2016. "Fuelling of spark ignition and homogenous charge compression ignition engines with low calorific value producer gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P3), pages 1464-1478.
    19. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Warmiński, Kazimierz & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina & Gołaszewski, Janusz, 2017. "Energy efficiency of perennial herbaceous crops production depending on the type of digestate and mineral fertilizers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 50-60.
    20. Paiano, Annarita & Lagioia, Giovanni, 2016. "Energy potential from residual biomass towards meeting the EU renewable energy and climate targets. The Italian case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 161-173.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:315:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922002987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.