IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v250y2019icp292-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomethane addition to California transmission pipelines: Regional simulation of the impact of regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Von Wald, Gregory A.
  • Stanion, Austin J.
  • Rajagopal, Deepak
  • Brandt, Adam R.

Abstract

Biomethane is a promising alternative fuel to mitigate the climate impacts arising from the natural gas sector. In California, several policies are in place to facilitate the development of biomethane. However, constraints on gas quality and gas properties can limit biomethane introduction into the gas pipeline. In this study, regional biomethane supplies and potential deviations in gas quality were assessed using steady-state simulation of natural gas pipeline networks at the zip-code scale under a variety of biomethane development scenarios and regulatory limits. Three regions of California – San Diego, Hanford, and South San Francisco bay area – were modeled. We explore local impacts to gas quality under various biomethane price scenarios and different levels of regulatory support. Across all regions, we do not find regional or local gas quality deviations to exceed interchangeability guidance with slightly relaxed biomethane heating value standards. Agricultural regions such as Hanford with high concentrations of dairy farms and low natural gas consumption may require pipeline upgrades to act as net exporters of biomethane. Regions with large seasonal variation in natural gas consumption may necessitate more stringent gas quality requirements to ensure safe combustion as gas composition varies across the year. High year-round demand for gas in urban regions will minimize gas quality deviation and could allow for case-by-case relaxation in gas quality requirements. We find that CO2 and biofuel credits under state and federal regulations such as the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) and U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) are vital to development of biomethane. With the incorporation of LCFS revenues, the portion of natural gas demands served by biomethane could be 4.3% in San Diego (5.2 bcf/y or 150 million m3/y), 54% in Hanford (2.66 bcf/y or 75.3 million m3/y), and 2.4% in the South Bay area (3.8 bcf/y or 110 million m3/y). Adding in current federal RFS credits, the biomethane supply only rises slightly in San Diego and South Bay Area but exceeds 100% of natural gas demand in Hanford (4.5 bcf/y or 130 million m3/y).

Suggested Citation

  • Von Wald, Gregory A. & Stanion, Austin J. & Rajagopal, Deepak & Brandt, Adam R., 2019. "Biomethane addition to California transmission pipelines: Regional simulation of the impact of regulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 292-301.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:250:y:2019:i:c:p:292-301
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919308864
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scheitrum, Daniel & Myers Jaffe, Amy & Dominguez-Faus, Rosa & Parker, Nathan, 2017. "California low carbon fuel policies and natural gas fueling infrastructure: Synergies and challenges to expanding the use of RNG in transportation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 355-364.
    2. Abeysekera, M. & Wu, J. & Jenkins, N. & Rees, M., 2016. "Steady state analysis of gas networks with distributed injection of alternative gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 991-1002.
    3. Parker, Nathan & Williams, Robert & Dominguez-Faus, Rosa & Scheitrum, Daniel, 2017. "Renewable natural gas in California: An assessment of the technical and economic potential," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 235-245.
    4. Sun, Qie & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinying & Liu, Longcheng & Yu, Zhixin & Yu, Xinhai, 2015. "Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 521-532.
    5. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    6. Patrizio, P. & Chinese, D., 2016. "The impact of regional factors and new bio-methane incentive schemes on the structure, profitability and CO2 balance of biogas plants in Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 573-583.
    7. Pellegrino, Sandro & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Greening the gas network – The need for modelling the distributed injection of alternative fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 266-286.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keogh, Niamh & Corr, D. & Monaghan, R.F.D, 2022. "Biogenic renewable gas injection into natural gas grids: A review of technical and economic modelling studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Pastore, Lorenzo Mario & Lo Basso, Gianluigi & de Santoli, Livio, 2022. "Can the renewable energy share increase in electricity and gas grids takes out the competitiveness of gas-driven CHP plants for distributed generation?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Zhang, Jinrui & Meerman, Hans & Benders, René & Faaij, André, 2022. "Potential role of natural gas infrastructure in China to supply low-carbon gases during 2020–2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    4. Baena-Moreno, Francisco M. & Malico, Isabel & Rodríguez-Galán, Mónica & Serrano, Antonio & Fermoso, Fernando G. & Navarrete, Benito, 2020. "The importance of governmental incentives for small biomethane plants in South Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Keogh, Niamh & Corr, D. & O'Shea, R. & Monaghan, R.F.D., 2022. "The gas grid as a vector for regional decarbonisation - a techno economic case study for biomethane injection and natural gas heavy goods vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    6. Guerin, Turlough F., 2022. "Business model scaling can be used to activate and grow the biogas-to-grid market in Australia to decarbonise hard-to-abate industries: An application of entrepreneurial management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Axsen, Jonn & Wolinetz, Michael, 2023. "What does a low-carbon fuel standard contribute to a policy mix? An interdisciplinary review of evidence and research gaps," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 54-63.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Szoplik, Jolanta & Stelmasińska, Paulina, 2019. "Analysis of gas network storage capacity for alternative fuels in Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 343-353.
    2. Lane, Blake & Kinnon, Michael Mac & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2022. "Deployment planning tool for environmentally sensitive heavy-duty vehicles and fueling infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Barbera, Elena & Menegon, Silvia & Banzato, Donatella & D'Alpaos, Chiara & Bertucco, Alberto, 2019. "From biogas to biomethane: A process simulation-based techno-economic comparison of different upgrading technologies in the Italian context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-673.
    4. Silverman, Rochelle E. & Flores, Robert J. & Brouwer, Jack, 2020. "Energy and economic assessment of distributed renewable gas and electricity generation in a small disadvantaged urban community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    5. Yusuf, Noor & Almomani, Fares, 2023. "Recent advances in biogas purifying technologies: Process design and economic considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    6. Romeo, Luis M. & Cavana, Marco & Bailera, Manuel & Leone, Pierluigi & Peña, Begoña & Lisbona, Pilar, 2022. "Non-stoichiometric methanation as strategy to overcome the limitations of green hydrogen injection into the natural gas grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    7. Felipe Solferini de Carvalho & Luiz Carlos Bevilaqua dos Santos Reis & Pedro Teixeira Lacava & Fernando Henrique Mayworm de Araújo & João Andrade de Carvalho Jr., 2023. "Substitution of Natural Gas by Biomethane: Operational Aspects in Industrial Equipment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Ramírez-Arpide, Félix Rafael & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro & Gallegos-Vázquez, Clemente & Santoyo-Cortés, Vinicio Horacio, 2019. "Bioenergy production from nopal cladodes and dairy cow manure on a farm-scale level: Challenges for its economic feasibility in Mexico," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 383-392.
    9. Scheitrum, Dan & Parker, Nathan C., 2018. "Analysis of United States Supplies of RNG and their Impact on the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard through 2030," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274453, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Raheli, Enrica & Wu, Qiuwei & Zhang, Menglin & Wen, Changyun, 2021. "Optimal coordinated operation of integrated natural gas and electric power systems: A review of modeling and solution methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Wang, Fei & Fu, Shanfei & Guo, Gang & Jia, Zhen-Zhen & Luo, Sheng-Jun & Guo, Rong-Bo, 2016. "Experimental study on hydrate-based CO2 removal from CH4/CO2 mixture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 76-84.
    12. Lombardi, Lidia & Francini, Giovanni, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 440-458.
    13. Davis, M. & Okunlola, A. & Di Lullo, G. & Giwa, T. & Kumar, A., 2023. "Greenhouse gas reduction potential and cost-effectiveness of economy-wide hydrogen-natural gas blending for energy end uses," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    14. Wantz, Eliot & Benizri, David & Dietrich, Nicolas & Hébrard, Gilles, 2022. "Rate-based modeling approach for High Pressure Water Scrubbing with unsteady gas flowrate and multicomponent absorption applied to biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    15. Keogh, Niamh & Corr, D. & O'Shea, R. & Monaghan, R.F.D., 2022. "The gas grid as a vector for regional decarbonisation - a techno economic case study for biomethane injection and natural gas heavy goods vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    16. Ghafoori, Mohammad Samim & Loubar, Khaled & Marin-Gallego, Mylène & Tazerout, Mohand, 2022. "Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of biomethane production via landfill biogas upgrading and power-to-gas technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    17. Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Ebrahimi-Moghadam, Amir & Pishbin, Seyyed Iman & Pourramezan, Mahdi, 2019. "Investigating the effect of hydrogen injection on natural gas thermo-physical properties with various compositions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 235-245.
    18. Quarton, Christopher J. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2018. "Power-to-gas for injection into the gas grid: What can we learn from real-life projects, economic assessments and systems modelling?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 302-316.
    19. Wei, Xintong & Qiu, Rui & Liang, Yongtu & Liao, Qi & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Xue, Jinjun & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Roadmap to carbon emissions neutral industrial parks: Energy, economic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    20. Enrico Vaccariello & Riccardo Trinchero & Igor S. Stievano & Pierluigi Leone, 2021. "A Statistical Assessment of Blending Hydrogen into Gas Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:250:y:2019:i:c:p:292-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.