IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v208y2017icp1538-1561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synergistic engine-fuel technologies for light-duty vehicles: Fuel economy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Morganti, Kai
  • Al-Abdullah, Marwan
  • Alzubail, Abdullah
  • Kalghatgi, Gautam
  • Viollet, Yoann
  • Head, Robert
  • Khan, Ahmad
  • Abdul-Manan, Amir

Abstract

Advanced engine technologies will play a central role in achieving future greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions targets for light-duty vehicles. However, these technologies will place greater emphasis on optimizing the engine and fuel as a synergistic system, since many technologies will require higher octane gasolines to realize their full social and environmental benefits. The most extreme example of a synergistic engine-fuel system is the Octane-on-Demand concept. This technology platform makes use of an oil-derived fuel at low and intermediate loads where the octane requirement of the engine is comparatively low, while a second high octane fuel is introduced at higher loads to suppress knock. This paper presents the first comprehensive study of vehicle fuel economy and well-to-wheel GHG emissions for the Octane-on-Demand concept with respect to a regular grade E10 gasoline (RON 93) and a high octane E30 gasoline (RON 101). Experimental fuel consumption maps are first used to evaluate the drive cycle fuel economy and GHG emissions for a light-duty vehicle equipped with two alternative powertrains. The upstream GHG emissions arising from the production of the fuels are then quantified, with consequent uncertainties assessed using Monte Carlo analysis based on probability distribution functions for critical input parameters. The results demonstrate that the Octane-on-Demand concept used in conjunction with either methanol or ethanol generally provides comparable well-to-wheel GHG emissions to the high octane E30 gasoline, with up to a 10% improvement in the vehicle fuel economy. The use of a non-traditional engine calibration strategy that maximizes the trade-off between thermal efficiency and fuel energy density also enables the amount of high octane fuel required to suppress knock to be reduced significantly. This increases the distance that the vehicle can be driven before the secondary tank requires refueling by a considerable margin, but comes at the expense of marginally higher well-to-wheel GHG emissions than could otherwise be achieved. These findings are shown to be largely insensitive to uncertainties in the upstream fuel production GHG emissions, with the exception of the land use change (LUC) for bioethanol. Overall, this study has implications for the design of engine-fuel systems for future light-duty vehicles.

Suggested Citation

  • Morganti, Kai & Al-Abdullah, Marwan & Alzubail, Abdullah & Kalghatgi, Gautam & Viollet, Yoann & Head, Robert & Khan, Ahmad & Abdul-Manan, Amir, 2017. "Synergistic engine-fuel technologies for light-duty vehicles: Fuel economy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1538-1561.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:208:y:2017:i:c:p:1538-1561
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917312461
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clairotte, M. & Adam, T.W. & Zardini, A.A. & Manfredi, U. & Martini, G. & Krasenbrink, A. & Vicet, A. & Tournié, E. & Astorga, C., 2013. "Effects of low temperature on the cold start gaseous emissions from light duty vehicles fuelled by ethanol-blended gasoline," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 44-54.
    2. Turner, J.W.G. & Pearson, R.J. & Dekker, E. & Iosefa, B. & Johansson, K. & ac Bergström, K., 2013. "Extending the role of alcohols as transport fuels using iso-stoichiometric ternary blends of gasoline, ethanol and methanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 72-86.
    3. Daniel, Ritchie & Xu, Hongming & Wang, Chongming & Richardson, Dave & Shuai, Shijin, 2013. "Gaseous and particulate matter emissions of biofuel blends in dual-injection compared to direct-injection and port injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 252-261.
    4. Iodice, Paolo & Senatore, Adolfo & Langella, Giuseppe & Amoresano, Amedeo, 2016. "Effect of ethanol–gasoline blends on CO and HC emissions in last generation SI engines within the cold-start transient: An experimental investigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 182-190.
    5. Orsi, Francesco & Muratori, Matteo & Rocco, Matteo & Colombo, Emanuela & Rizzoni, Giorgio, 2016. "A multi-dimensional well-to-wheels analysis of passenger vehicles in different regions: Primary energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic cost," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 197-209.
    6. Zhang, Bo & Sarathy, S. Mani, 2016. "Lifecycle optimized ethanol-gasoline blends for turbocharged engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 38-53.
    7. Balat, Mustafa & Balat, Havva, 2009. "Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(11), pages 2273-2282, November.
    8. Huang, Yuhan & Hong, Guang & Huang, Ronghua, 2015. "Investigation to charge cooling effect and combustion characteristics of ethanol direct injection in a gasoline port injection engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 244-254.
    9. John M. DeCicco & Danielle Yuqiao Liu & Joonghyeok Heo & Rashmi Krishnan & Angelika Kurthen & Louise Wang, 2016. "Carbon balance effects of U.S. biofuel production and use," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 667-680, October.
    10. Wang, Xin & Ge, Yunshan & Liu, Linlin & Peng, Zihang & Hao, Lijun & Yin, Hang & Ding, Yan & Wang, Junfang, 2015. "Evaluation on toxic reduction and fuel economy of a gasoline direct injection- (GDI-) powered passenger car fueled with methanol–gasoline blends with various substitution ratios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 134-143.
    11. Zeng, Yuan & Tan, Xianchun & Gu, Baihe & Wang, Yi & Xu, Baoguang, 2016. "Greenhouse gas emissions of motor vehicles in Chinese cities and the implication for China’s mitigation targets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1016-1025.
    12. Lanzanova, Thompson Diórdinis Metzka & Dalla Nora, Macklini & Zhao, Hua, 2016. "Performance and economic analysis of a direct injection spark ignition engine fueled with wet ethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 230-239.
    13. Collet, Pierre & Hélias, Arnaud & Lardon, Laurent & Steyer, Jean-Philippe & Bernard, Olivier, 2015. "Recommendations for Life Cycle Assessment of algal fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1089-1102.
    14. Agarwal, Avinash Kumar & Shukla, Pravesh Chandra & Gupta, Jai Gopal & Patel, Chetankumar & Prasad, Rajesh Kumar & Sharma, Nikhil, 2015. "Unregulated emissions from a gasohol (E5, E15, M5, and M15) fuelled spark ignition engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 732-741.
    15. Wang, Chongming & Zeraati-Rezaei, Soheil & Xiang, Liming & Xu, Hongming, 2017. "Ethanol blends in spark ignition engines: RON, octane-added value, cooling effect, compression ratio, and potential engine efficiency gain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 603-619.
    16. Luo, Lin & van der Voet, Ester & Huppes, Gjalt, 2009. "Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1613-1619, August.
    17. Chang, Wei-Ru & Hwang, Jenn-Jiang & Wu, Wei, 2017. "Environmental impact and sustainability study on biofuels for transportation applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 277-288.
    18. Costagliola, M.A. & De Simio, L. & Iannaccone, S. & Prati, M.V., 2013. "Combustion efficiency and engine out emissions of a S.I. engine fueled with alcohol/gasoline blends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1162-1171.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Badra, Jihad & AlRamadan, Abdullah S. & Sarathy, S. Mani, 2017. "Optimization of the octane response of gasoline/ethanol blends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 778-793.
    2. Wang, Xin & Ge, Yunshan & Zhang, Chuanzhen & Tan, Jianwei & Hao, Lijun & Liu, Jia & Gong, Huiming, 2016. "Effects of engine misfire on regulated, unregulated emissions from a methanol-fueled vehicle and its ozone forming potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 187-195.
    3. Zhang, Bo & Sarathy, S. Mani, 2016. "Lifecycle optimized ethanol-gasoline blends for turbocharged engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 38-53.
    4. Awad, Omar I. & Mamat, R. & Ibrahim, Thamir K. & Hammid, Ali Thaeer & Yusri, I.M. & Hamidi, Mohd Adnin & Humada, Ali M. & Yusop, A.F., 2018. "Overview of the oxygenated fuels in spark ignition engine: Environmental and performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 394-408.
    5. Salvo, Orlando de & Vaz de Almeida, Flávio G., 2019. "Influence of technologies on energy efficiency results of official Brazilian tests of vehicle energy consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 98-112.
    6. Wang, Xin & Ge, Yunshan & Liu, Linlin & Peng, Zihang & Hao, Lijun & Yin, Hang & Ding, Yan & Wang, Junfang, 2015. "Evaluation on toxic reduction and fuel economy of a gasoline direct injection- (GDI-) powered passenger car fueled with methanol–gasoline blends with various substitution ratios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 134-143.
    7. Gong, Changming & Yu, Jiawei & Wang, Kang & Liu, Jiajun & Huang, Wei & Si, Xiankai & Wei, Fuxing & Liu, Fenghua & Han, Yongqiang, 2018. "Numerical study of plasma produced ozone assisted combustion in a direct injection spark ignition methanol engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1028-1037.
    8. Awad, Omar I. & Mamat, R. & Ali, Obed M. & Sidik, N.A.C. & Yusaf, T. & Kadirgama, K. & Kettner, Maurice, 2018. "Alcohol and ether as alternative fuels in spark ignition engine: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2586-2605.
    9. Gong, Changming & Liu, Jiajun & Peng, Legao & Liu, Fenghua, 2017. "Numerical study of effect of injection and ignition timings on combustion and unregulated emissions of DISI methanol engine during cold start," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 457-465.
    10. Kumar, T. Sathish & Ashok, B., 2021. "Critical review on combustion phenomena of low carbon alcohols in SI engine with its challenges and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Cho, Jaeho & Si, Woosung & Jang, Wonwook & Jin, Dongyoung & Myung, Cha-Lee & Park, Simsoo, 2015. "Impact of intermediate ethanol blends on particulate matter emission from a spark ignition direct injection (SIDI) engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 592-602.
    12. Duan, Xiongbo & Liu, Jingping & Tan, Yonghao & Luo, Baojun & Guo, Genmiao & Wu, Zhenkuo & Liu, Weiqiang & Li, Yangyang, 2018. "Influence of single injection and two-stagnation injection strategy on thermodynamic process and performance of a turbocharged direct-injection spark-ignition engine fuelled with ethanol and gasoline ," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 942-953.
    13. Agarwal, Avinash Kumar & Shukla, Pravesh Chandra & Gupta, Jai Gopal & Patel, Chetankumar & Prasad, Rajesh Kumar & Sharma, Nikhil, 2015. "Unregulated emissions from a gasohol (E5, E15, M5, and M15) fuelled spark ignition engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 732-741.
    14. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & González-Garay, Andrés & Bernardi, Andrea & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Dowell, Niall Mac & Chachuat, Benoit & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "Electricity grid decarbonisation or green methanol fuel? A life-cycle modelling and analysis of today′s transportation-power nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    15. Vallinayagam, R. & Vedharaj, S. & Yang, W.M. & Roberts, W.L. & Dibble, R.W., 2015. "Feasibility of using less viscous and lower cetane (LVLC) fuels in a diesel engine: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1166-1190.
    16. Lee, Ziyoung & Park, Sungwook, 2020. "Particulate and gaseous emissions from a direct-injection spark ignition engine fueled with bioethanol and gasoline blends at ultra-high injection pressure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 80-90.
    17. Deng, Yuanwang & Liu, Huawei & Zhao, Xiaohuan & E, Jiaqiang & Chen, Jianmei, 2018. "Effects of cold start control strategy on cold start performance of the diesel engine based on a comprehensive preheat diesel engine model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 279-287.
    18. Xianchun Tan & Yuan Zeng & Baihe Gu & Yi Wang & Baoguang Xu, 2018. "Scenario Analysis of Urban Road Transportation Energy Demand and GHG Emissions in China—A Case Study for Chongqing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-32, June.
    19. Eduardo J. C. Cavalcanti & Daniel R. S. da Silva & Monica Carvalho, 2022. "Life Cycle and Exergoenvironmental Analyses of Ethanol: Performance of a Flex-Fuel Spark-Ignition Engine at Wide-Open Throttle Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Han, Dandan & E, Jiaqiang & Deng, Yuanwang & Chen, Jingwei & Leng, Erwei & Liao, Gaoliang & Zhao, Xiaohuan & Feng, Changling & Zhang, Feng, 2021. "A review of studies using hydrocarbon adsorption material for reducing hydrocarbon emissions from cold start of gasoline engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:208:y:2017:i:c:p:1538-1561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.