IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v182y2016icp260-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GIS-based biomass assessment and supply logistics system for a sustainable biorefinery: A case study with cotton stalks in the Southeastern US

Author

Listed:
  • Sahoo, K.
  • Hawkins, G.L.
  • Yao, X.A.
  • Samples, K.
  • Mani, S.

Abstract

Envisioning a sustainable biorefinery requires reliable information on the sustainable availability of biomass, optimal plant location and delivered cost. In this paper, we have developed an integrated Geographic Information System (GIS) based sustainable biomass assessment, site optimization and supply logistics cost model to assess the spatial and temporal availability of crop residues, to identify optimal plant sites and to calculate the delivered cost. The grid-level (30×30m) assessment model was developed for crop residues using three primary sustainability indicators: (1) Soil Erosion (SE), (2) Soil Conditioning Index (SCI) and (3) Crop residue yield ⩾2.5dryMg/ha. The Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) prediction models for each indicator were developed and implemented in the GIS platform to assess sustainably available crop residues. A multi-criteria geospatial analysis was used to identify suitable plant sites. GIS-based location-allocation model was used to site biorefineries/plants at optimal locations and generate feedstock supply curves. The developed model was demonstrated with the sustainable assessment of cotton stalk (CS) to produce fuel pellets in the study region (Georgia, USA). The model has estimated that about 1.6milliondryMg of CS is available annually to support seven pellet plants with an average annual plant capacity of 200,000dryMg. The average delivered cost of CS ranged between 68 and 75$/dryMg delivered as large rectangular bales with the transport radii ranged from 31 to 60km. The spatial and temporal variations in the topology and crop yield directly influenced the sustainable availability of CS, the optimal plant location and its capacity and the delivered cost. However, the changes in the optimal plant location and delivered cost were minimal for large capacity plants (>400,000dryMg). The developed model can be used to assess multiple crop residues, to manage and control feedstock supply risks and delivered cost variations for a sustainable biorefinery.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahoo, K. & Hawkins, G.L. & Yao, X.A. & Samples, K. & Mani, S., 2016. "GIS-based biomass assessment and supply logistics system for a sustainable biorefinery: A case study with cotton stalks in the Southeastern US," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 260-273.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:182:y:2016:i:c:p:260-273
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916312144
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lourinho, Gonçalo & Brito, Paulo, 2015. "Assessment of biomass energy potential in a region of Portugal (Alto Alentejo)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 189-201.
    2. Klose, Andreas & Drexl, Andreas, 2005. "Facility location models for distribution system design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 4-29, April.
    3. Monteleone, Massimo & Cammerino, Anna Rita Bernadette & Garofalo, Pasquale & Delivand, Mitra Kami, 2015. "Straw-to-soil or straw-to-energy? An optimal trade off in a long term sustainability perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 891-899.
    4. Höhn, J. & Lehtonen, E. & Rasi, S. & Rintala, J., 2014. "A Geographical Information System (GIS) based methodology for determination of potential biomasses and sites for biogas plants in southern Finland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-10.
    5. Maung, Thein A. & Gustafson, Cole R. & Saxowsky, David M. & Nowatzki, John & Miljkovic, Tatjana & Ripplinger, David, 2013. "The logistics of supplying single vs. multi-crop cellulosic feedstocks to a biorefinery in southeast North Dakota," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 229-238.
    6. Sultana, Arifa & Kumar, Amit, 2012. "Optimal siting and size of bioenergy facilities using geographic information system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 192-201.
    7. Ian J. Bonner & Kara G. Cafferty & David J. Muth & Mark D. Tomer & David E. James & Sarah A. Porter & Douglas L. Karlen, 2014. "Opportunities for Energy Crop Production Based on Subfield Scale Distribution of Profitability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Robert Perlack, Robert & Eaton, Lawrence & Thurhollow, Anthony & Langholtz, Matt & De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel, 2011. "US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry," MPRA Paper 89324, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    9. Muth, D.J. & Bryden, K.M. & Nelson, R.G., 2013. "Sustainable agricultural residue removal for bioenergy: A spatially comprehensive US national assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 403-417.
    10. Mielenz, Jonathan R., 1997. "Feasibility studies for biomass-to-ethanol production facilities in Florida and Hawaii," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 279-284.
    11. Grassi, Stefano & Junghans, Sven & Raubal, Martin, 2014. "Assessment of the wake effect on the energy production of onshore wind farms using GIS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 827-837.
    12. Ekman, Anna & Wallberg, Ola & Joelsson, Elisabeth & Börjesson, Pål, 2013. "Possibilities for sustainable biorefineries based on agricultural residues – A case study of potential straw-based ethanol production in Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 299-308.
    13. Shumaker, George A. & Luke-Morgan, Audrey S. & McKissick, John C., 2009. "The Economic Feasibility of Using Georgia Biomass for Electrical Energy Production," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 27(1-2), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masum, Md Farhad Hossain & Dwivedi, Puneet & Anderson, William F., 2020. "Estimating unit production cost, carbon intensity, and carbon abatement cost of electricity generation from bioenergy feedstocks in Georgia, United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Efthymios Rodias & Remigio Berruto & Dionysis Bochtis & Alessandro Sopegno & Patrizia Busato, 2019. "Green, Yellow, and Woody Biomass Supply-Chain Management: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Cheng, Jie & Hu, Sheng-Chun & Geng, Zeng-Chao & Zhu, Ming-Qiang, 2022. "Effect of structural changes of lignin during the microwave-assisted alkaline/ethanol pretreatment on cotton stalk for an effective enzymatic hydrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    4. Jin Su Jeong, 2018. "Biomass Feedstock and Climate Change in Agroforestry Systems: Participatory Location and Integration Scenario Analysis of Biomass Power Facilities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Chopin, Pierre & Guindé, Loïc & Causeret, François & Bergkvist, Göran & Blazy, Jean-Marc, 2019. "Integrating stakeholder preferences into assessment of scenarios for electricity production from locally produced biomass on a small island," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 128-136.
    6. Lozano-García, Diego Fabián & Santibañez-Aguilar, José Ezequiel & Lozano, Francisco J. & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio, 2020. "GIS-based modeling of residual biomass availability for energy and production in Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Tomasz Noszczyk, 2019. "The Influence of Freezing Temperature Storage on the Mechanical Durability of Commercial Pellets from Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Alessandro Suardi & Sergio Saia & Walter Stefanoni & Carina Gunnarsson & Martin Sundberg & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Admixing Chaff with Straw Increased the Residues Collected without Compromising Machinery Efficiencies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Sahoo, Kamalakanta & Bilek, Edward & Bergman, Richard & Mani, Sudhagar, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of producing solid biofuels and biochar from forest residues using portable systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 578-590.
    10. Cheng, Jie & Hu, Sheng-Chun & Sun, Guo-Tao & Kang, Kang & Zhu, Ming-Qiang & Geng, Zeng-Chao, 2021. "Comparison of activated carbons prepared by one-step and two-step chemical activation process based on cotton stalk for supercapacitors application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    11. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    12. Jayarathna, Lasinidu & Kent, Geoff & O'Hara, Ian & Hobson, Philip, 2020. "A Geographical Information System based framework to identify optimal location and size of biomass energy plants using single or multiple biomass types," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    13. Fernando López-Rodríguez & Justo García Sanz-Calcedo & Francisco J. Moral-García, 2019. "Spatial Analysis of Residual Biomass and Location of Future Storage Centers in the Southwest of Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Sahoo, Kamalakanta & Mani, Sudhagar, 2019. "Economic and environmental impacts of an integrated-state anaerobic digestion system to produce compressed natural gas from organic wastes and energy crops," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Jin Su Jeong & Álvaro Ramírez-Gómez, 2017. "A Multicriteria GIS-Based Assessment to Optimize Biomass Facility Sites with Parallel Environment—A Case Study in Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Chen, Yan & Huang, Zhenhua & Ai, Hongshan & Guo, Xingkun & Luo, Fan, 2021. "The Impact of GIS/GPS Network Information Systems on the Logistics Distribution Cost of Tobacco Enterprises," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Pajones, Markus & Pfoser, Sarah, 2018. "Supporting the selection of sustainable logistics locations," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Logistics 4.0 and Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Innovative Solutions for Logistics and Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Context of In, volume 26, pages 169-182, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    18. Alhamwi, Alaa & Medjroubi, Wided & Vogt, Thomas & Agert, Carsten, 2017. "GIS-based urban energy systems models and tools: Introducing a model for the optimisation of flexibilisation technologies in urban areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1-9.
    19. Piradee Jusakulvijit & Alberto Bezama & Daniela Thrän, 2022. "An Integrated Assessment of GIS-MCA with Logistics Analysis for an Assessment of a Potential Decentralized Bioethanol Production System Using Distributed Agricultural Residues in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Sushil Poudel & Mohammad Marufuzzaman & Md Abdul Quddus & Sudipta Chowdhury & Linkan Bian & Brian Smith, 2018. "Designing a Reliable and Congested Multi-Modal Facility Location Problem for Biofuel Supply Chain Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, June.
    21. De Laporte, Aaron V. & Weersink, Alfons J. & McKenney, Daniel W., 2016. "Effects of supply chain structure and biomass prices on bioenergy feedstock supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1053-1064.
    22. Albers, Ariane & Collet, Pierre & Lorne, Daphné & Benoist, Anthony & Hélias, Arnaud, 2019. "Coupling partial-equilibrium and dynamic biogenic carbon models to assess future transport scenarios in France," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 316-330.
    23. Senocak, Ahmet Alp & Guner Goren, Hacer, 2023. "Three-phase artificial intelligence-geographic information systems-based biomass network design approach: A case study in Denizli," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    24. Sharma, B. & Birrell, S. & Miguez, F.E., 2017. "Spatial modeling framework for bioethanol plant siting and biofuel production potential in the U.S," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 75-86.
    25. Hu, Sheng-Chun & Cheng, Jie & Wang, Wu-Ping & Sun, Guo-Tao & Hu, Li-Le & Zhu, Ming-Qiang & Huang, Xiao-Hua, 2021. "Structural changes and electrochemical properties of lacquer wood activated carbon prepared by phosphoric acid-chemical activation for supercapacitor applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 82-94.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seyed Hashem Mousavi-Avval & Sami Khanal & Ajay Shah, 2023. "Assessment of Potential Pennycress Availability and Suitable Sites for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Refineries in Ohio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Renata Marks-Bielska & Stanisław Bielski & Anastasija Novikova & Kęstutis Romaneckas, 2019. "Straw Stocks as a Source of Renewable Energy. A Case Study of a District in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Huynh Truong Gia Nguyen & Erik Lyttek & Pankaj Lal & Taylor Wieczerak & Pralhad Burli, 2020. "Assessment of Switchgrass-Based Bioenergy Supply Using GIS-Based Fuzzy Logic and Network Optimization in Missouri (U.S.A.)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Sanchez, Daniel L. & Callaway, Duncan S., 2016. "Optimal scale of carbon-negative energy facilities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 437-444.
    6. Venturini, Giada & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Münster, Marie, 2019. "How to maximise the value of residual biomass resources: The case of straw in Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 369-388.
    7. Maung, Thein A. & Gustafson, Cole R. & Saxowsky, David M. & Nowatzki, John & Miljkovic, Tatjana & Ripplinger, David, 2013. "The logistics of supplying single vs. multi-crop cellulosic feedstocks to a biorefinery in southeast North Dakota," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 229-238.
    8. Devlin, Ger & Talbot, Bruce, 2014. "Deriving cooperative biomass resource transport supply strategies in meeting co-firing energy regulations: A case for peat and wood fibre in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1700-1709.
    9. Avinash Bharti & Kunwar Paritosh & Venkata Ravibabu Mandla & Aakash Chawade & Vivekanand Vivekanand, 2021. "GIS Application for the Estimation of Bioenergy Potential from Agriculture Residues: An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Tomaž Levstek & Črtomir Rozman, 2022. "A Model for Finding a Suitable Location for a Micro Biogas Plant Using Gis Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Costa, Fabrício Rodrigues & Ribeiro, Carlos Antonio Alvares Soares & Marcatti, Gustavo Eduardo & Lorenzon, Alexandre Simões & Teixeira, Thaisa Ribeiro & Domingues, Getulio Fonseca & Castro, Nero Lemos, 2020. "GIS applied to location of bioenergy plants in tropical agricultural areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 911-918.
    12. Arnò, Paolo & Fiore, Silvia & Verda, Vittorio, 2017. "Assessment of anaerobic co-digestion in areas with heterogeneous waste production densities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 221-236.
    13. Mikkel Bojesen & Luc Boerboom & Hans Skov-Petersen, 2014. "Towards a sustainable capacity expansion of the Danish biogas sector," IFRO Working Paper 2014/03, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    14. Golecha, Rajdeep & Gan, Jianbang, 2016. "Biomass transport cost from field to conversion facility when biomass yield density and road network vary with transport radius," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 321-331.
    15. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Evaluation of biogas potential from livestock manures and rural wastes using GIS in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 351-356.
    16. Höfer, Tim & Sunak, Yasin & Siddique, Hafiz & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Wind farm siting using a spatial Analytic Hierarchy Process approach: A case study of the Städteregion Aachen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 222-243.
    17. Piotr Gradziuk & Barbara Gradziuk & Anna Trocewicz & Błażej Jendrzejewski, 2020. "Potential of Straw for Energy Purposes in Poland—Forecasts Based on Trend and Causal Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Vukasinovic, Vladimir & Gordic, Dusan & Zivkovic, Marija & Koncalovic, Davor & Zivkovic, Dubravka, 2019. "Long-term planning methodology for improving wood biomass utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 818-829.
    19. Valenti, Francesca & Porto, Simona M.C. & Dale, Bruce E. & Liao, Wei, 2018. "Spatial analysis of feedstock supply and logistics to establish regional biogas power generation: A case study in the region of Sicily," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 50-63.
    20. Chukwuma, Emmanuel Chibundo & Okey-Onyesolu, Faith Chinenye & Ani, Kingsley Amaechi & Nwanna, Emmanuel Chukwudi, 2021. "GIS bio-waste assessment and suitability analysis for biogas power plant: A case study of Anambra state of Nigeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1182-1194.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:182:y:2016:i:c:p:260-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.