IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v354y2019icp9-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal policy delays and the classical growth cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Sportelli, Mario
  • De Cesare, Luigi

Abstract

This paper deals with the impact of fiscal policy delays on the national income adjustment process. Here we reconsidered the pioneering work by Wolfstetter, who introduced the public sector in the well-known Goodwin’s classical growth cycle model, where the conflict between capital and labor on the distribution of income is formalized. Unlike Wolfstetter, we take into account two finite time delays characterizing the public economic activity. The former delay concerns the structure of the tax system and the government tax revenues; the latter pertains the political process governing the public purchase decisions and the actual expenditures. The result is a system of delayed differential equations (DDEs). Choosing delay terms as bifurcation parameters, we proved the existence of Hopf bifurcations. Therefore, we studied the stability and the direction of the bifurcating periodic solutions by using the first Lyapunov coefficient. Some numerical simulations carried out to support theoretical results show that, in the basic model, which coincides with the one by Wolfstetter. The effectiveness of policies (pro-cyclical and counter-cyclical) are strictly dependent on the length of the lags and on their particular combinations. As the basic model lacks an investment function, because investments passively equals the saving, we add that function taking into account the profit expectations. Furthermore, we assumed that the size of the public expenditure decreases quickly with the rise of the employment rate. These new hypotheses are such that to yield an extended model, where, unlike the basic model, we proved that, without lags, a pro-cyclical policy does not assure the stabilization of the economy if the government adopts weak reduction of the public expenditure. In this case, regular cycles around the equilibrium arise. When the lags are positive, the government might stabilize the system only by a low discretional expenditure, if the policy is counter-cyclical, and by low reduction of its expenditure, if the policy is pro-cyclical. This on condition that some particular pairs of the two delays subsist.

Suggested Citation

  • Sportelli, Mario & De Cesare, Luigi, 2019. "Fiscal policy delays and the classical growth cycle," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 354(C), pages 9-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:354:y:2019:i:c:p:9-31
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.02.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300319301341
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2019.02.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karaoglu, Esra & Merdan, Huseyin, 2014. "Hopf bifurcations of a ratio-dependent predator–prey model involving two discrete maturation time delays," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 159-168.
    2. Neamtu, Mihaela & Opris, Dumitru & Chilarescu, Constantin, 2005. "Hopf bifurcation in a dynamic IS-LM model with time delay," MPRA Paper 13270, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Yoshida, Hiroyuki & Asada, Toichiro, 2007. "Dynamic analysis of policy lag in a Keynes-Goodwin model: Stability, instability, cycles and chaos," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 441-469, March.
    4. De Cesare, Luigi & Sportelli, Mario, 2005. "A dynamic IS-LM model with delayed taxation revenues," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 233-244.
    5. Akio Matsumoto, 2008. "Destabilizing Effects On Income Adjustment Process With Fiscal Policy Lags," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 713-735, November.
    6. Fanti, Luciano & Manfredi, Piero, 2007. "Chaotic business cycles and fiscal policy: An IS-LM model with distributed tax collection lags," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 736-744.
    7. Liao, Xiaofeng & Li, Chuandong & Zhou, Shangbo, 2005. "Hopf bifurcation and chaos in macroeconomic models with policy lag," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 91-108.
    8. Li, Kai & Wei, Junjie, 2009. "Stability and Hopf bifurcation analysis of a prey–predator system with two delays," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 2606-2613.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Cesare, Luigi & Sportelli, Mario, 2020. "Stability and direction of Hopf bifurcations of a cyclical growth model with two-time delays and one-delay dependent coefficients," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Rajpal, Akanksha & Bhatia, Sumit Kaur & Hiremath, Kirankumar R., 2022. "Inspecting the stability of non-linear IS-LM model with dual time delay," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    3. Zhiming Ao & Ziyue Chen & He Nie, 2022. "Time to build, financial frictions, and the effectiveness of fiscal stimulus," Financial Economics Letters, Anser Press, vol. 1(1), pages 21-28, December.
    4. Sportelli, Mario & De Cesare, Luigi, 2022. "A Goodwin type cyclical growth model with two-time delays," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 95-102.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Cesare, Luigi & Sportelli, Mario, 2012. "Fiscal policy lags and income adjustment processes," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 433-438.
    2. Igor Kotlán & Zuzana Machová, 2014. "Horizont daňové politiky v zemích OECD [Tax Policy Horizon in the OECD Countries]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(2), pages 161-173.
    3. Son, Woo-Sik & Park, Young-Jai, 2011. "Delayed feedback on the dynamical model of a financial system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 208-217.
    4. Tamara Merkulova & Tatyana Bitkova & Kateryna Kononova, 2016. "Tax Factors of Sustainable Development: System Dynamics Approach towards Tax Evasion Analyses," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 35-47.
    5. De Cesare, Luigi & Sportelli, Mario, 2020. "Stability and direction of Hopf bifurcations of a cyclical growth model with two-time delays and one-delay dependent coefficients," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Akio Matsumoto & Ferenc Szidarovszky, 2016. "Delay Dynamics in a Classical IS-LM Model with Tax Collections," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(4), pages 667-697, November.
    7. Shunsuke Shinagawa & Eiji Tsuzuki, 2019. "Policy Lag and Sustained Growth," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 5(3), pages 403-431, October.
    8. Hommes, Cars & Li, Kai & Wagener, Florian, 2022. "Production delays and price dynamics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 341-362.
    9. Ahmad Naimzada & Marina Pireddu, 2013. "Dynamics in a nonlinear Keynesian good market model," Working Papers 254, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2013.
    10. Din Prathumwan & Kamonchat Trachoo, 2019. "Application of the Laplace Homotopy Perturbation Method to the Black–Scholes Model Based on a European Put Option with Two Assets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, March.
    11. Neamţu, Mihaela & Opriş, Dumitru & Chilaˇrescu, Constantin, 2007. "Hopf bifurcation in a dynamic IS–LM model with time delay," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 519-530.
    12. De Cesare, Luigi & Sportelli, Mario, 2022. "A non-linear approach to Kalecki’s investment cycle," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 57-70.
    13. Din Prathumwan & Wannika Sawangtong & Panumart Sawangtong, 2017. "An Analysis on the Fractional Asset Flow Differential Equations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Chen, Wei-Ching, 2008. "Dynamics and control of a financial system with time-delayed feedbacks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1198-1207.
    15. Dubey, Balram & Sajan, & Kumar, Ankit, 2021. "Stability switching and chaos in a multiple delayed prey–predator model with fear effect and anti-predator behavior," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 164-192.
    16. Gomes, Orlando, 2013. "Information stickiness on general equilibrium and endogenous cycles," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 7, pages 1-43.
    17. ZHANG, Lu & GUO, Qing & ZHANG, Junbiao & HUANG, Yong & XIONG, Tao, 2015. "Did China׳s rare earth export policies work? — Empirical evidence from USA and Japan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 82-90.
    18. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2012. "The dynamics of a differentiated duopoly with quantity competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 421-427.
    19. Liu, Xiaoming & Liao, Xiaofeng, 2009. "Necessary and sufficient conditions for Hopf bifurcation in tri-neuron equation with a delay," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 481-490.
    20. Jana, Debaldev & Agrawal, Rashmi & Upadhyay, Ranjit Kumar, 2015. "Dynamics of generalist predator in a stochastic environment: Effect of delayed growth and prey refuge," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 1072-1094.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:354:y:2019:i:c:p:9-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.