IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v280y2023ics0378377423000902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalized water production relations through process-based modeling: A viticulture example

Author

Listed:
  • Knowling, Matthew J.
  • Walker, Rob R.
  • Pellegrino, Anne
  • Edwards, Everard J.
  • Westra, Seth
  • Collins, Cassandra
  • Ostendorf, Bertram
  • Bennett, Bree

Abstract

The potential of digital agriculture to support on-farm decision making is predicated on the assumption that ‘cause-and-effect’ relationships can be encoded in a mathematical form. One particularly important application area is irrigation decision making, which is informed by the relationship between applied water and end-of-season crop yield (‘water production relations’). Yet this relationship is often partial, owing to its many determining factors, especially for woody perennial crops such as grapevines. Process-based models are a way in which to represent these relationships in a manner that is both interpretable and generalizable. Here we conduct numerical experiments using a process-based crop model to evaluate water production relations for grapevines and how these relations are influenced by genetic and environmental factors as well as irrigation timing decisions. A real-world case study representing a Shiraz vineyard in South Australia is considered. Results show a largely linear relation between total irrigation applied and yield across all numerical experiments, notwithstanding significant uncertainty due to genetic and environmental factors. However, when considering water production relations in relative terms (e.g., change in tonnes per megalitre), the influence of these factors between seasons is reduced, allowing for more robust insights. Exploration of water productivity as a function of phenological stage shows that the average production sensitivity is greatest during veraison (3.5 tonnes per megalitre) and least between bud burst and flowering (2.3 tonnes per megalitre), despite considerable overlap in productivity range between stages. By putting meaningful bounds on water production relations through process-based modeling, growers and their advisors can achieve improved farm outcomes by better informed water application decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Knowling, Matthew J. & Walker, Rob R. & Pellegrino, Anne & Edwards, Everard J. & Westra, Seth & Collins, Cassandra & Ostendorf, Bertram & Bennett, Bree, 2023. "Generalized water production relations through process-based modeling: A viticulture example," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:280:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423000902
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423000902
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Heping & Oweis, Theib, 1999. "Water-yield relations and optimal irrigation scheduling of wheat in the Mediterranean region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 195-211, January.
    2. Richwell Mubita Mwiya & Zhanyu Zhang & Chengxin Zheng & Ce Wang, 2020. "Comparison of Approaches for Irrigation Scheduling Using AquaCrop and NSGA-III Models under Climate Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Li, Jiang & Song, Jian & Li, Mo & Shang, Songhao & Mao, Xiaomin & Yang, Jian & Adeloye, Adebayo J., 2018. "Optimization of irrigation scheduling for spring wheat based on simulation-optimization model under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 245-260.
    4. Saseendran, S.A. & Ahuja, Lajpat R. & Ma, Liwang & Trout, Thomas J. & McMaster, Gregory S. & Nielsen, David C. & Ham, Jay M. & Andales, Allan A. & Halvorson, Ardel D. & Chávez, José L. & Fang, Quanxia, 2015. "Developing and normalizing average corn crop water production functions across years and locations using a system model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 65-77.
    5. Sebastian, Bárbara & Baeza, Pilar & Santesteban, Luis G. & Sanchez de Miguel, Patricia & De La Fuente, Mario & Lissarrague, José R., 2015. "Response of grapevine cv. Syrah to irrigation frequency and water distribution pattern in a clay soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 269-279.
    6. Li, Mo & Fu, Qiang & Singh, Vijay P. & Liu, Dong, 2018. "An interval multi-objective programming model for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-36.
    7. Foster, T. & Brozović, N. & Butler, A.P. & Neale, C.M.U. & Raes, D. & Steduto, P. & Fereres, E. & Hsiao, T.C., 2017. "AquaCrop-OS: An open source version of FAO's crop water productivity model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 18-22.
    8. Geerts, Sam & Raes, Dirk, 2009. "Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1275-1284, September.
    9. Li, He & Refalo, James & Maisondieu-Laforge, Olivier, 2021. "National corruption and international banking," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    10. Comas, Louise H. & Trout, Thomas J. & DeJonge, Kendall C. & Zhang, Huihui & Gleason, Sean M., 2019. "Water productivity under strategic growth stage-based deficit irrigation in maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 433-440.
    11. Shang, Songhao & Mao, Xiaomin, 2006. "Application of a simulation based optimization model for winter wheat irrigation scheduling in North China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 314-322, October.
    12. Foster, T. & Brozović, N., 2018. "Simulating Crop-Water Production Functions Using Crop Growth Models to Support Water Policy Assessments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 9-21.
    13. Linker, Raphael & Ioslovich, Ilya & Sylaios, Georgios & Plauborg, Finn & Battilani, Adriano, 2016. "Optimal model-based deficit irrigation scheduling using AquaCrop: A simulation study with cotton, potato and tomato," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 236-243.
    14. Cai, Ximing & Ringler, Claudia & You, Jiing-Yun, 2008. "Substitution between water and other agricultural inputs: Implications for water conservation in a River Basin context," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 38-50, May.
    15. DeJonge, K.C. & Ascough, J.C. & Andales, A.A. & Hansen, N.C. & Garcia, L.A. & Arabi, M., 2012. "Improving evapotranspiration simulations in the CERES-Maize model under limited irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 92-103.
    16. Knowling, Matthew J. & Bennett, Bree & Ostendorf, Bertram & Westra, Seth & Walker, Rob R. & Pellegrino, Anne & Edwards, Everard J. & Collins, Cassandra & Pagay, Vinay & Grigg, Dylan, 2021. "Bridging the gap between data and decisions: A review of process-based models for viticulture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Foster, T. & Brozović, N., 2018. "Simulating Crop-Water Production Functions Using Crop Growth Models to Support Water Policy Assessments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 9-21.
    2. Wu, Hui & Yue, Qiong & Guo, Ping & Xu, Xiaoyu & Huang, Xi, 2022. "Improving the AquaCrop model to achieve direct simulation of evapotranspiration under nitrogen stress and joint simulation-optimization of irrigation and fertilizer schedules," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Kögler, Friederike & Söffker, Dirk, 2020. "State-based open-loop control of plant growth by means of water stress training," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Zhang, Chao & Xie, Ziang & Wang, Qiaojuan & Tang, Min & Feng, Shaoyuan & Cai, Huanjie, 2022. "AquaCrop modeling to explore optimal irrigation of winter wheat for improving grain yield and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Attia, Ahmed & El-Hendawy, Salah & Al-Suhaibani, Nasser & Alotaibi, Majed & Tahir, Muhammad Usman & Kamal, Khaled Y., 2021. "Evaluating deficit irrigation scheduling strategies to improve yield and water productivity of maize in arid environment using simulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Iqbal, M. Anjum & Shen, Yanjun & Stricevic, Ruzica & Pei, Hongwei & Sun, Hongyoung & Amiri, Ebrahim & Penas, Angel & del Rio, Sara, 2014. "Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 61-72.
    7. Galioto, Francesco & Battilani, Adriano, 2021. "Agro-economic simulation for day by day irrigation scheduling optimisation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    8. Zhang, Ting & Zuo, Qiang & Ma, Ning & Shi, Jianchu & Fan, Yuchuan & Wu, Xun & Wang, Lichun & Xue, Xuzhang & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2023. "Optimizing relative root-zone water depletion thresholds to maximize yield and water productivity of winter wheat using AquaCrop," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    9. Karrou, M. & Oweis, T., 2012. "Water and land productivities of wheat and food legumes with deficit supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 94-103.
    10. Peake, A.S. & Carberry, P.S. & Raine, S.R. & Gett, V. & Smith, R.J., 2016. "An alternative approach to whole-farm deficit irrigation analysis: Evaluating the risk-efficiency of wheat irrigation strategies in sub-tropical Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 61-76.
    11. Jiang, Yao & Xu, Xu & Huang, Quanzhong & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2016. "Optimizing regional irrigation water use by integrating a two-level optimization model and an agro-hydrological model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 76-88.
    12. Anapalli, Saseendran S. & Pinnamaneni, Srinivasa R. & Reddy, Krishna N. & Sui, Ruixiu & Singh, Gurbir, 2022. "Investigating soybean (Glycine max L.) responses to irrigation on a large-scale farm in the humid climate of the Mississippi Delta region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    13. Zhang, Xiaoxing & Guo, Ping & Zhang, Fan & Liu, Xiao & Yue, Qiong & Wang, Youzhi, 2021. "Optimal irrigation water allocation in Hetao Irrigation District considering decision makers’ preference under uncertainties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    14. Erick C. Jones & Benjamin D. Leibowicz, 2022. "Climate risk management in agriculture using alternative electricity and water resources: a stochastic programming framework," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 117-135, March.
    15. Wang, Yufeng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Zhang, Xiaotao, 2021. "Modified water-nitrogen productivity function based on response of water sensitive index to nitrogen for hybrid maize under drip fertigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    16. Yue, Qiong & Zhang, Fan & Zhang, Chenglong & Zhu, Hua & Tang, Yikuan & Guo, Ping, 2020. "A full fuzzy-interval credibility-constrained nonlinear programming approach for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    17. Araya, A. & Prasad, P.V.V. & Gowda, P.H. & Sharda, V. & Rice, C.W. & Ciampitti, I.A., 2021. "Evaluating optimal irrigation strategies for maize in Western Kansas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    18. Mustafa, S.M.T. & Vanuytrecht, E. & Huysmans, M., 2017. "Combined deficit irrigation and soil fertility management on different soil textures to improve wheat yield in drought-prone Bangladesh," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 124-137.
    19. Kögler, F. & Söffker, D., 2017. "Water (stress) models and deficit irrigation: System-theoretical description and causality mapping," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 135-156.
    20. Yang, Chenyao & Fraga, Helder & Ieperen, Wim Van & Santos, João Andrade, 2017. "Assessment of irrigated maize yield response to climate change scenarios in Portugal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 178-190.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:280:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423000902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.