IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v244y2021ics0378377420321119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review on comprehensive sloping farmland utilization based on a perspective of scientometrics analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Chang
  • Qu, Liqin
  • Zhang, Qingwen
  • Li, Xuecao

Abstract

Sloping farmland (SpF) is an important component of cultivated land resources. In the context of food security and sustainable agricultural development, comprehensive SpF utilization has drawn wide and increasing attentions. A systematic analysis on the research progress of comprehensive SpF utilization is critical for a better understanding of the sustainable agricultural cultivation, facilitating the macroeconomic decision-making. This paper conducted a quantitative analysis of literature related to comprehensive SpF utilization over the past few decades (1946–2019) by using scientometrics methods, with the objectives to: (1) identify the research hotspots and summarize the relevant research processes in different time periods; (2) reveal the temporal evolution of those hotspots. Our results showed: 1) research on SpF dramatically increased over the past few decades (1946–2019), which can be classified into four chronological periods (I, II, III, and IV); (2) research regarding land productivity improvement and hydrological and erosion processes on SpF were dominant in the period I; (3) the research hotspots were switched to land use changes and associated soil erosion response, ecological disturbance and restoration as the social demand was intensifying in the period II; (4) the research focus of period III was aiming at the governance and rational utilization of SpF and gradually transforming to a large regional scale; (5) the intercross and penetration between disciplines had been continuously enhanced in the period IV, and the application of high and new technologies had also promoted the diversification of research methods, with aims to achieve sustainable agricultural development. Although considerable progress had been achieved around the world, more theoretical and empirical studies are required to understand the comprehensive SpF utilization and their implications to better support sustainable agricultural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Chang & Qu, Liqin & Zhang, Qingwen & Li, Xuecao, 2021. "A systematic review on comprehensive sloping farmland utilization based on a perspective of scientometrics analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420321119
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420321119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yang & Yang, Liye & Wang, Hao & Xu, Ranran & Chang, Shenghua & Hou, Fujiang & Jia, Qianmin, 2019. "Nutrient and planting modes strategies improves water use efficiency, grain-filling and hormonal changes of maize in semi-arid regions of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Wolka, Kebede & Mulder, Jan & Biazin, Birhanu, 2018. "Effects of soil and water conservation techniques on crop yield, runoff and soil loss in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 67-79.
    3. Wang, Xuehong & Bennett, Jeff & Xie, Chen & Zhang, Zhitao & Liang, Dan, 2007. "Estimating non-market environmental benefits of the Conversion of Cropland to Forest and Grassland Program: A choice modeling approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 114-125, June.
    4. TerAvest, Dan & Wandschneider, Philip R. & Thierfelder, Christian & Reganold, John P., 2019. "Diversifying conservation agriculture and conventional tillage cropping systems to improve the wellbeing of smallholder farmers in Malawi," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 23-35.
    5. Kumar, S. & Gupta, S. K. & Ram, Sewa, 1994. "Inverse techniques for estimating transmissivity and drainable pore space utilizing data from subsurface drainage experiments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-2), pages 41-58, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Hongying & Zhu, Ningyuan & Qiao, Jun & Tang, Jun, 2024. "Evaluating the long-term effects of best management practices on pollution reduction and soil quality improvement in sloping farmland of the Three Gorges Reservoir area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mullan, Katrina & Grosjean, Pauline & Kontoleon, Andreas, 2011. "Land Tenure Arrangements and Rural-Urban Migration in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 123-133, January.
    2. Massamba Diop & Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Adnane Beniaich & Mohamed El Gharous & Khalil El Mejahed, 2022. "Soil and Water Conservation in Africa: State of Play and Potential Role in Tackling Soil Degradation and Building Soil Health in Agricultural Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-29, October.
    3. repec:ehu:biltok:5583 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Kacimov, A. R., 2000. "Comment on the paper "An analytical solution for design of bi-level drainage systems" by A.K. Verma, S.K. Gupta, K.K. Singh, H.S. Chauhan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 193-200, December.
    5. Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & He, Huiyan & Xin, Liangjie & Tan, Minghong, 2020. "How reliable are cultivated land assets as social security for Chinese farmers?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Haiyan Fang, 2021. "Responses of Runoff and Soil Loss on Slopes to Land Use Management and Rainfall Characteristics in Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Xin Yang & Fan Zhang & Cheng Luo & Anlu Zhang, 2019. "Farmland Ecological Compensation Zoning and Horizontal Fiscal Payment Mechanism in Wuhan Agglomeration, China, From the Perspective of Ecological Footprint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Miaoxi Zhao & Yanliu Lin & Huiqin Wang, 2022. "Locational Differences of Collective Land and Their Socioeconomic Effects on the Rural Elderly in China’s Pearl River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Anika Reetsch & Kai Schwärzel & Christina Dornack & Shadrack Stephene & Karl-Heinz Feger, 2020. "Optimising Nutrient Cycles to Improve Food Security in Smallholder Farming Families—A Case Study from Banana-Coffee-Based Farming in the Kagera Region, NW Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-34, November.
    10. Rai, Rajesh Kumar & Scarborough, Helen, 2012. "Estimating the public benefits of mitigating damages caused by invasive plant species in a subsistence economy," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124421, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    11. Barano Siswa Sulistyawan & Budy P. Resosudarmo & Rene W. Verburg & Pita Verweij & Mia Amalia & Marija Bockarjova, 2022. "Economic valuation of water services related to protected forest management: a case of Bukit Batabuh in the RIMBA corridor, Central Sumatra, Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9330-9354, July.
    12. Willis Ndeda Ochilo & Stefan Toepfer & Privat Ndayihanzamaso & Idah Mugambi & Janny Vos & Celestin Niyongere, 2022. "Assessing the Plant Health System of Burundi: What It Is, Who Matters and Why," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Espoir M. Bagula & Jackson Gilbert M. Majaliwa & Gustave N. Mushagalusa & Twaha A. Basamba & John-Baptist Tumuhairwe & Jean-Gomez M. Mondo & Patrick Musinguzi & Cephas B. Mwimangire & Géant B. Chuma &, 2022. "Climate Change Effect on Water Use Efficiency under Selected Soil and Water Conservation Practices in the Ruzizi Catchment, Eastern D.R. Congo," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Xin, Wang & Yanping, Song & Tan, Li, 2021. "Small farmer's planting confidence and willingness to pay for leguminous green fertilizer: environmental attributes perspective," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(01), August.
    15. Gelo, Dambala & Koch, Steven F., 2015. "Contingent valuation of community forestry programs in Ethiopia: Controlling for preference anomalies in double-bounded CVM," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 79-89.
    16. Xin Yang & Anlu Zhang & Fan Zhang, 2019. "Farmers’ Heterogeneous Willingness to Pay for Farmland Non-Market Goods and Services on the Basis of a Mixed Logit Model—A Case Study of Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Roshan Sherchan & Rajesh Kumar Rai & Roshani Rai & Arun Dhakal, 2022. "Designing a community-based insurance scheme to reduce human–wildlife conflict," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5112-5130, April.
    18. Upadhyaya, A. & Chauhan, H. S., 2000. "An analytical solution for bi-level drainage design in the presence of evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 169-184, July.
    19. Tuan, Tran Hu & Lindhjem, Henrik, 2008. "Meta-analysis of nature conservation values in Asia & Oceania: Data heterogeneity and benefit transfer issues," MPRA Paper 11470, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Tadesse, Tewodros & Berhane, Tsegay & Mulatu, Dawit W. & Rannestad, Meley Mekonen, 2021. "Willingness to accept compensation for afromontane forest ecosystems conservation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    21. Sophal Chhun & Viktoria Kahui & Henrik Moller & Paul Thorsnes, 2015. "Advancing Marine Policy Toward Ecosystem-Based Management by Eliciting Public Preferences," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(3), pages 261-275.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420321119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.