IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/accoun/v36y2001i3p329-347.html

A comparison of New Zealand and British product-costing practices

Author

Listed:
  • Lamminmaki, Dawne
  • Drury, Colin

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Lamminmaki, Dawne & Drury, Colin, 2001. "A comparison of New Zealand and British product-costing practices," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 329-347, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:accoun:v:36:y:2001:i:3:p:329-347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020-7063(01)00106-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Drury & Mike Tayles, 1994. "Product costing in UK manufacturing organizations," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 443-470.
    2. Bruns, Wj & Waterhouse, Jh, 1975. "Budgetary Control And Organization Structure," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(2), pages 177-203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evdokia I. Tsifora & Prodromos D. Chatzoglou, 2016. "Exploring the effects of firm and product characteristics on cost system’s features," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 93-116.
    2. Ax, Christian & Greve, Jan & Nilsson, Ulf, 2008. "The impact of competition and uncertainty on the adoption of target costing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 92-103, September.
    3. Alcouffe, Simon & Galy, Nadine & Gaté, Loïc, 2016. "Une méta-analyse qualitative de la littérature sur les déterminants de l'adoption de l'activity-based costing [A meta-analysis of the literature on the determinants of the adoption of activity-based costing]," MPRA Paper 73381, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Khurram Ashfaq & Sohail Younas & Muhammad Usman & Zahid Hanif, 2014. "Traditional Vs. Contemporary Management Accounting Practices and its Role and Usage across Business Life Cycle Stages: Evidence from Pakistani Financial Sector," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(4), pages 104-125, October.
    5. Simon Alcouffe & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gaté, 2016. "Une méta-analyse qualitative de la littérature sur les déterminants de l'adoption de l'Activity-Based Costing (méthode ABC)," Post-Print hal-01900677, HAL.
    6. Simon Alcouffe & Jonathan Maurice & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gate, 2019. "Is the limited diffusion of management accounting innovations really a paradox? A meta-analysis of the relationship between product diversity and the adoption of Activity-Based Costing [La faible diffusion des innovations en contrôle de gestion es," Post-Print hal-02124677, HAL.
    7. Brierley, John A. & Cowton, Christopher J. & Drury, Colin, 2006. "A comparison of product costing practices in discrete-part and assembly manufacturing and continuous production process manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 314-321, April.
    8. Evdokia I. Tsifora & Prodromos D. Chatzoglou, 2016. "The evolution of costing during the period 1985-2015: Progress or inactivity?," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 9(2), pages 7-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prabhu Sivabalan & Peter Booth & Teemu Malmi & David A. Brown, 2009. "An exploratory study of operational reasons to budget," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(4), pages 849-871, December.
    2. Francesca Francioli & Alberto Quagli, 2021. "Management accounting change and the rise of Vespa (1884-1965)," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 2), pages 313-338.
    3. Robert Simons, 1988. "Analysis of the organizational characteristics related to tight budget goals," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(1), pages 267-283, September.
    4. Solabomi Omobola Ajibolade, Ph.D, FCA, FIMLS, ACTI, 2013. "Drivers of Choice of Management Accounting System Designs in Nigerian Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(9), pages 45-57, July.
    5. Karen Maas & Kellie Liket, 2011. "Talk the Walk: Measuring the Impact of Strategic Philanthropy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 445-464, May.
    6. Nicolas Berland, 2002. "Comment peut-on gérer sans budget ?," Post-Print hal-01667137, HAL.
    7. Reid, Gavin C. & Smith, Julia A., 2009. "A coevolutionary analysis of organisational systems and processes: Quantitative applications to information system dynamics in small entrepreneurial firms," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 762-781.
    8. Simon Alcouffe & Pierre Mévellec, 2012. "Analyse de la littérature sur l'ABC et proposition d'une taxinomie," Post-Print hal-00936600, HAL.
    9. Paulo Afonso & Vishad Vyas & Ana Antunes & Sérgio Silva & Boris P. J. Bret, 2021. "A Stochastic Approach for Product Costing in Manufacturing Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Hanen Moalla, 2006. "La diffusion de la méthode ABC en Tunisie," Post-Print halshs-00548107, HAL.
    11. Nicolas Berland, 2002. "Comment Peut-On Gerer Sans Budget ?," Post-Print halshs-00584438, HAL.
    12. Christophe Germain, 2003. "Le " Unbalanced Scorecard " Ou L'Analyse De La Differenciation Des Systemes De Mesure De La Performance," Post-Print halshs-00582778, HAL.
    13. Shirley Daniel & Dongyoung Lee & Wolf Reitsperger, 2014. "Raising quality consciousness among Chinese manufacturing personnel: Testing the effectiveness of performance management tools," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 549-573, June.
    14. Rodney Coyte & Martin Messner & Shan Zhou, 2022. "The revival of zero‐based budgeting: drivers and consequences of firm‐level adoptions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3147-3188, September.
    15. Yasheng Chen & Johnny Jermias, 2014. "Business strategy, executive compensation and firm performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 54(1), pages 113-134, March.
    16. John Brierley & Christopher Cowton & Colin Drury, 2001. "Research into product costing practice: a European perspective," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 215-256.
    17. Chenhall, Robert H. & Moers, Frank, 2015. "The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its integration into management control," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-13.
    18. Malmi, Teemu, 1999. "Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 649-672, November.
    19. Matejka, M. & De Waegenaere, A.M.B., 2000. "Organizational Design and Management Accounting Change," Other publications TiSEM 0c9d3756-e33d-43a3-9ba7-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Guilding, Chris, 1999. "Competitor-focused accounting: an exploratory note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 583-595, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:accoun:v:36:y:2001:i:3:p:329-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620179 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.