IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2017-03-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Economics Learning, Problematics, and Student Economics Literacy

Author

Listed:
  • Novi Trisnawati

    (Department of Economics Education, Economic Faculty, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jl Ketintang, 60231 Surabaya, Indonesia,)

  • Ruri Nurul Aeni Wulandari

    (Department of Economics Education, Economic Faculty, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jl Ketintang, 60231 Surabaya, Indonesia,)

  • Yoyok Soesatyo

    (Department of Economics Education, Economic Faculty, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jl Ketintang, 60231 Surabaya, Indonesia,)

  • Albrian Fiky Prakoso

    (Department of Economics Education, Economic Faculty, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jl Ketintang, 60231 Surabaya, Indonesia,)

Abstract

The study states that students have a high motivation when they are following economics learning. At the time of learning conditions of the students are ready to participate in learning and learning situation during economics lessons the students feel comfortable with their classroom. It is also supported by the using of no teaching aids and a boring learning media. The solution to these problems: (1) Add a reference, (2) create a customized power point related to its development, (3) using case studies in teaching, (4) each lecturer is expected to draw up learning materials in line with learning outcome of the department. The study states that the regional economy is the most difficult subject that the can be understood by economic education students. This is because the basic of this subject is mathematical economy because they often calculate matrix

Suggested Citation

  • Novi Trisnawati & Ruri Nurul Aeni Wulandari & Yoyok Soesatyo & Albrian Fiky Prakoso, 2017. "Development of Economics Learning, Problematics, and Student Economics Literacy," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 246-256.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-03-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/4169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/4169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajindar K. Koshal & Ashok K. Gupta & Anita Goyal & Vimal Navin Choudhary, 2008. "Assessing Economic Literacy of Indian MBA Students," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(2), pages 43-51.
    2. W. Lee Hansen & Michael K. Salemi & John J. Siegfried, 2002. "Use It or Lose It: Teaching Literacy in the Economics Principles Course," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 463-472, May.
    3. Michael K. Salemi, 2005. "Teaching Economic Literacy: Why, What and How," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 4(2), pages 46-57.
    4. Rajindar K. Koshal & Ashok K. Gupta & Anita Goyal & Vimal Navin Choudhary, 2008. "Assessing Economic Literacy of Indian MBA Students," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(2), pages 43-52, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Kniepert, 2014. "Die (Neue) Institutionenökonomik als Ansatz für einen erweiterten, offeneren Zugang zur Volkswirtschaftslehre," Working Papers 552014, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    2. repec:zbw:inwedp:552014 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Stephen Day & Evelyn Nunes & Bruno Sultanum, 2022. "Is It Still an Econ Course? The Effect of a Standardized Personal Finance Test on the Learning of Economics," Working Papers 2201, VCU School of Business, Department of Economics.
    4. Mousumi Singha Mahapatra & Swati Alok & Jayasree Raveendran, 2017. "Financial Literacy of Indian Youth: A Study on the Twin Cities of Hyderabad–Secunderabad," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 6(2), pages 132-147, July.
    5. Boulatoff, Catherine & Cyrus, Teresa L., 2022. "Improving student outcomes in large introductory courses," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    6. Kiliyanni, Abdul Latheef & Sivaraman, Sunitha, 2016. "The perception-reality gap in financial literacy: Evidence from the most literate state in India," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 47-64.
    7. Mehmet POLAT, 2023. "An Empirical Application on Determine the Economic Literacy Levels of Public Staff," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 31(56).
    8. Kathryn L. Combs & Monica E. Hartmann & Joseph L. Kreitzer, 2023. "An International Exercise to Increase Awareness of How Market, Political, and Cultural Institutions Affect Economic Activity," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 54-77, January.
    9. Karla Borja & Suzanne Dieringer, 2023. "Telling My Story: Applying Storytelling to Complex Economic Data," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 328-348, June.
    10. Bret Sikkink, 2019. "Socratic Seminars in the Economics Classroom," Journal of Economics Teaching, Journal of Economics Teaching, vol. 4(2), pages 76-92, December.
    11. Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2011. "Kaderschmieden der Wirtschaft und/oder Universitäten? Der Auftrag der Wirtschaftsuniversitäten und –fakultäten im 21. Jahrhundert," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 12(3), pages 317-337, August.
    12. Jonathan Guest, 2015. "Reflections on ten years of using economics games and experiments in teaching," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1115619-111, December.
    13. Wayne Geerling, 2012. "Bringing the 'Dismal Science' to Life: Teaching Economics Through Multimedia," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 11(2), pages 81-90.
    14. KimMarie McGoldrick & Robert Garnett, 2013. "Big Think: A Model for Critical Inquiry in Economics Courses," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 389-398, October.
    15. Mark Maier & Joann Bangs & Niels-Hugo Blunch, 2010. "Context-rich Problems in Economics," Chapters, in: Michael K. Salemi & William B. Walstad (ed.), Teaching Innovations in Economics, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Robert F. Garnett, Jr., 2009. "Rethinking The Pluralist Agenda In Economics Education," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 8(2), pages 58-71.
    17. Helena Chytilová & Zdeněk Chytil, 2014. "Ekonomické vzdělání a peněžní iluze, experimentální přístup [Economic Education and Money Illusion: An Experimental Approach]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(4), pages 500-520.
    18. Paola Bongini & Paolo Trivellato & Mariangela Zenga, 2015. "Business Students and Financial Literacy: When Will the Gender Gap Fade away?," Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 13-30, June.
    19. Robin Bartlett & Marianne Ferber & Carole Green, 2009. "The Committee on Economic Education: Its Effect on the Introductory Course and Women in Economics," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2-3), pages 153-172, January.
    20. van de Laar, M.M. & de Neubourg, C.R.J., 2004. "Emotions and foreign direct investment: a theoretical and emperical exploration," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    21. Jeffrey Wagner, 2007. "Plato's Republic and liberal economic education for the twenty-first century," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 1(2), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economics Learning; Problematics; Economics Literacy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate
    • A29 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Other
    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-03-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.