IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/v15y2025i2id17023.html

Do Investors Tend to Overreact when Investing in Clean Energy Stock Indices?

Author

Listed:
  • Dias, Rui

    (Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Setúbal, Portugal; & ESCAD-Instituto Politécnico da Lusofonia, Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Galvão, Rosa

    (Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Setúbal, Portugal)

  • Cruz, Sandra

    (ESCAD-Instituto Politécnico da Lusofonia, Lisboa, Portugal; & CEFAGE- University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-189 Faro, Portugal)

  • Gonçalves, Sidalina

    (Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Setúbal, Portugal)

  • Irfan, Mohammad

    (Christ University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India)

  • Teixeira, Nuno

    (Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Setúbal, Portugal)

  • Alexandre, Paulo

    (Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Setúbal, Portugal)

  • Palma, Cristina

    (Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Setúbal, Portugal)

  • Almeida, Liliana

    (Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Ciências Empresariais, Setúbal, Portugal)

Abstract

Due to climate change, investors are increasingly interested in clean energy stocks attracting many investors due to clean energy prospects. This paper analyses investor overreactions to long-term prices in various clean energy stock indices, such as Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE), Global Clean Energy (GCEI), as well as the Dow Jones Industrials (DJI) stock index, over the period from 24 February 2022 to 23 May 2024. The results show that the Global Clean Energy (GCEI) clean energy stock index rejects H0 at the 16-day lag at a significance level of 1%; similarly, the Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE) index rejects the null hypothesis at lags 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 days, both indices show negative serial autocorrelation, which means that price movements are not entirely random and are influenced by prior price movements. This evidence could mean that investors overreact to the information that reaches the market. On the other hand, the ETF (PWYF) and the Dow Jones Industrial Stock Index (DJI) show that the random walk hypothesis has not been rejected. In other words, these markets show that they are in equilibrium and that the existence of exaggerated reactions on the part of investors is not significant. The answer to the research question was partially accepted, so the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 led to the partial presence of overreactions in these stock indices. In conclusion, investors operating in these markets should exercise caution and consider their risk tolerance before investing. Investors should, therefore, continue to monitor market trends and adjust their investment strategies accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Dias, Rui & Galvão, Rosa & Cruz, Sandra & Gonçalves, Sidalina & Irfan, Mohammad & Teixeira, Nuno & Alexandre, Paulo & Palma, Cristina & Almeida, Liliana, 2025. "Do Investors Tend to Overreact when Investing in Clean Energy Stock Indices?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 15(2), pages 157-163, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:2:id:17023
    DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.17023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/17023/8564
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32479/ijeep.17023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:2:id:17023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.