IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Schadensersatz für Opfer von Naturkatastrophen: ein Vergleich zwischen Belgien und den Niederlanden

Listed author(s):
  • Véronique Bruggeman
  • Michael G. Faure
  • Miriam Haritz
Registered author(s):

    The paper compares the development and present state of compensation for victims of catastrophes in Belgium and The Netherlands, two countries that have both undergone legislative changes in this field in recent years. From the perspective of law and economics, the evolution of private insurance and public intervention through compensation funds, the preference for private or public solutions and the actual financing of these are analyzed. Drawing from practical experience such as the case of flood risks, the solutions are tested in view of incentive-based financing, such as risk differentiation and other. The paper concludes that both countries have produced different forms of Public Private Partnerships, whereby the private insurance market is more developed in Belgium than in The Netherlands, where the reform process has not yet come to an end. Die vorliegende Untersuchung vergleicht die Entwicklung der Entschädigung für Opfer von Naturkatastrophen in Belgien und den Niederlande bis hin zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Dinge. In beiden Ländern ist es in den letzten Jahren zu Veränderungen in diesem Bereich gekommen, die hier aus Sicht der Rechtsökonomie untersucht werden. Dabei liegt der Schwerpunkt auf der Frage, inwieweit sich ein privater Versicherungsmarkt herausgebildet hat oder auf staatliche Katastrophenfonds zurückgegriffen wird, sowie einer Untersuchung der jeweiligen Finanzierungs- und Auszahlungsmechanismen. Zu diesem Zwecke wird die praktische Anwendung der Lösungen insbesondere am Beispiel von Hochwasserschäden, mit Blick auf die Möglichkeit einer anreizbasierten Finanzierung, wie der Risikodifferenzierung, deutlich gemacht. Im Ergebnis wird festgestellt, dass sich in beiden Ländern unterschiedliche Formen von sogenannten Public Private Partnerships entwickelt haben, wobei das Angebot privater Versicherungen in Belgien weitaus ausgeprägter ist als in den Niederlanden, wo der Reformprozess noch nicht abgeschlossen ist.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its journal Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Volume (Year): 77 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 18-43

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:77-4-2
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin

    Phone: xx49-30-89789-0
    Fax: xx49-30-89789-200
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Reimund Schwarze & Gert G. Wagner, 2004. "In the Aftermath of Dresden: New Directions in German Flood Insurance," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, The International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 154-168, 04.
    2. Reimund Schwarze & Gert G Wagner, 2004. "In the Aftermath of Dresden: New Directions in German Flood Insurance," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 29(2), pages 154-168, April.
    3. Epstein, Richard A, 1996. "Catastrophic Responses to Catastrophic Risks," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 12(2-3), pages 287-308, May.
    4. Christian Gollier, 2005. "Some Aspects of the Economics of Catastrophe Risk Insurance," CESifo Working Paper Series 1409, CESifo Group Munich.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:77-4-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.