IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dij/revfcs/v11y2008iq4p137-170.html

Le problème du regroupement des activités dans la modélisation ABC:une approche possible

Author

Listed:
  • Clément Thomas

    (Université de Rennes 1)

  • Michel Gervais

    (Université de Rennes 1)

Abstract

(VF)La méthode ABC insiste sur la nécessaire homogénéité des activités pour calculer des coûts fiables. Mais cette insistance conduit à un nombre d'activités très élevé et à une complexité trop grande. Pour traiter le problème, les tenants de la méthode proposent des regroupements, en oubliant la condition d'homogénéité. Cet article tente de résoudre le paradoxe.(VA)Activity-based costing systems rely on the necessary homogeneity of activities to provide relevant coste. This technical condition forces controllers to distinguish between a large number of activities and may hence induce overwhelming complexity . ABC supporters facing this issue suggest to regroup activities without considering homogeneity. The present article tries to solve the paradox.

Suggested Citation

  • Clément Thomas & Michel Gervais, 2008. "Le problème du regroupement des activités dans la modélisation ABC:une approche possible," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(4), pages 137-170, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:11:y:2008:i:q4:p:137-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-crego.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/rev/114170.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schniederjans, Marc J. & Garvin, Tim, 1997. "Using the analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 72-80, July.
    2. Michel Gervais & Yves Levant, 2007. "Comment garantir l'homogénéité globale dans la méthode UVA ? Deux études de cas," Post-Print halshs-00220508, HAL.
    3. Gervais Thenet, 1998. "L'explication de la consommation de coûts dans le secteur bancaire:la complémentarité de la méthode de régression en composantes principales et de la régression PLS," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 1(2), pages 167-190, June.
    4. E. Labro & M. Vanhoucke, 2005. "A simulation analysis of interactions between errors in costing system design," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/333, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michel Gervais & Yves Levant & Charles Ducrocq, 2010. "Le Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC):un premier bilan à travers une étude de cas longitudinale," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(1), pages 123-155., March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Berland & Michel Gervais, 2008. "À quoi ont rêvé (et n’ont pas rêvé) les chercheurs en contrôle durant les dix dernières années? Dix ans de recherche en contrôle," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(Special), pages 109-148, June.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1486 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Ho, William, 2008. "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 211-228, April.
    4. Eva Labro & Mario Vanhoucke, 2008. "Diversity in Resource Consumption Patterns and Robustness of Costing Systems to Errors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1715-1730, October.
    5. Stefan N. Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    6. Homburg, Carsten, 2004. "Improving activity-based costing heuristics by higher-level cost drivers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 332-343, September.
    7. Tsai, Wen-Hsien & Hung, Shih-Jieh, 2009. "Dynamic pricing and revenue management process in Internet retailing under uncertainty: An integrated real options approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 471-481, April.
    8. C. Homburg & Julia Nasev & Philipp Plank, 2018. "The impact of cost allocation errors on price and product-mix decisions," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 497-527, August.
    9. Shiwei Yu & Shuwen Zhang & Lawrence Agbemabiese & Fukun Zhang, 2017. "Multi-stage goal programming models for production optimization in the middle and later periods of oilfield development," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 421-437, August.
    10. Michel Gervais & Yves Levant & Charles Ducrocq, 2010. "Le Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC):un premier bilan à travers une étude de cas longitudinale," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(1), pages 123-155., March.
    11. Burritt, Roger & Schaltegger, Stefan, 2014. "Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 327-343.
    12. J. Albrecht & M. Neyt & T. Verbeke, 2005. "Bureaucratisation and the growth of health care expenditures in Europe," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/335, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    13. Graziano Coller & Paolo Collini, 2015. "The optimality of full-cost pricing: a simulation analysis of the price-adjustment dynamics," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 157-191, August.
    14. Gabriel, Steven A. & Kumar, Satheesh & Ordonez, Javier & Nasserian, Amirali, 2006. "A multiobjective optimization model for project selection with probabilistic considerations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 297-313, December.
    15. Ho, Hui-Ping & Chang, Ching-Ter & Ku, Cheng-Yuan, 2015. "House selection via the internet by considering homebuyers’ risk attitudes with S-shaped utility functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 188-201.
    16. Sina Hocke & Matthias Meyer & Iris Lorscheid, 2015. "Improving simulation model analysis and communication via design of experiment principles: an example from the simulation-based design of cost accounting systems," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 131-155, August.
    17. Friederike Wall, 2015. "Beneficial Effects Of Randomized Organizational Change On Performance," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05n06), pages 1-23, August.
    18. Badri, Masood A., 1999. "Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 237-248, September.
    19. Eva Labro, 2015. "Using simulation methods in accounting research," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 99-104, August.
    20. Stephan Leitner, 2014. "A simulation analysis of interactions among intended biases in costing systems and their effects on the accuracy of decision-influencing information," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 22(1), pages 113-138, March.
    21. W-H Tsai & W-C Chou & W Hsu, 2009. "The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for selecting socially responsible investment: an effective MCDM model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1396-1410, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:11:y:2008:i:q4:p:137-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Informatique Technique MSH Dijon (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.revues.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.