IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v45y2021i8.html

The role of premarital cohabitation in the timing of first birth in China

Author

Listed:
  • Lijun Yang

    (Beijing Normal University)

Abstract

Background: Premarital cohabitation has become an increasingly popular pathway to marriage in China. However, we lack studies on its role in the timing of first birth. Objective: Motivated by the “second demographic transition” (SDT) theory, three questions are examined: (1) Does cohabitation accelerate the timing of first birth via premarital conceptions? (2) Are cohabitants who are not pregnant at the time of marriage more likely to delay parenthood than non-cohabitants? (3) Does the association between premarital cohabitation and the timing of first birth vary by birth cohort? Methods: Information regarding premarital cohabitational experience and age (in months) at first birth was collected from 7,310 women in the 2010–2018 China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). The role of cohabitation in the timing of first birth was evaluated using a discrete time competing-risk model. Results: Premarital cohabitation accelerates the timing of first birth by increasing the risk of premarital conceptions, but it delays first birth conceived within marriage. The fertility-accelerating effect of premarital cohabitation rebounds in the post-1980s generation after a temporary decline between the 1960s and 1970s birth cohorts, while the fertility-delaying effect of cohabitation has been consistently observed without any sign of decline or rebound over time. Conclusions: The contradictory role of premarital cohabitation in the timing of first birth in China exemplifies a complex interplay between the tendency for path dependency and nonconformist value reorientations in the SDT. The rebound of the fertility-accelerating effect of cohabitation among the post-1980s generation suggests that the two contradictory roles of cohabitation will likely coexist for a long time. Contribution: The fertility-delaying effect of premarital cohabitation is largely compensated for by the fertility-accelerating effect of cohabitation. A cohabitant-noncohabitant gap in the probability of being childless by age 30 emerges when the fertility-delaying effect of cohabitation is exacerbated by a considerable delay in marriage.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijun Yang, 2021. "The role of premarital cohabitation in the timing of first birth in China," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(8), pages 259-290.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:45:y:2021:i:8
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol45/8/45-8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhongwei Zhao & Guangyu Zhang, 2018. "Socioeconomic Factors Have Been the Major Driving Force of China’s Fertility Changes Since the Mid-1990s," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(2), pages 733-742, April.
    2. Yang, Lijun, 2018. "Higher education expansion and post-college unemployment: Understanding the roles of fields of study in China," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 62-74.
    3. Wendy Manning & Jessica Cohen, 2015. "Teenage Cohabitation, Marriage, and Childbearing," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 34(2), pages 161-177, April.
    4. William L. Parish & Edward O. Laumann & Sanyu A. Mojola, 2007. "Sexual Behavior in China: Trends and Comparisons," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 729-756, December.
    5. Carsten Herrmann-Pillath, 2006. "Cultural Species and Institutional Change in China," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 539-574, September.
    6. Jia Yu & Yu Xie, 2021. "Recent trends in the Chinese family: National estimates from 1990 to 2010," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(25), pages 595-608.
    7. Chi Zhang, 2017. "Population in China," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(8), pages 1333-1334, September.
    8. Ron Lesthaeghe, 2010. "The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 211-251, June.
    9. James Raymo & Miho Iwasawa & Larry Bumpass, 2009. "Cohabitation and family formation in Japan," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 46(4), pages 785-803, November.
    10. Fenglian Du & Xiao-yuan Dong, 2010. "Women’s Labor Force Participation and Childcare Choices in Urban China during the Economic Transition," Departmental Working Papers 2010-04, The University of Winnipeg, Department of Economics.
    11. Alice Goldstein & Michael White & idney Goldstein, 1997. "Migration, fertility, and state policy in Hubei Province, China," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 34(4), pages 481-491, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zachary Van Winkle & Fangqi Wen, 2023. "A Holistic Approach to Family Life Course Change across 1930–1978 Chinese Birth Cohorts," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 49(2), pages 279-317, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yumiao Zhang & Wenbin Zang, 2022. "Do the Marital Statuses of Adult Offspring Affect Their Parent’s Mental Health? Empirical Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Jarl E. Mooyaart & Aart C. Liefbroer, 2016. "The Influence of Parental Education on Timing and Type of Union Formation: Changes Over the Life Course and Over Time in the Netherlands," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(4), pages 885-919, August.
    3. Hyunjoon Park, 2021. "Introduction to the special collection on family changes and inequality in East Asia," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(40), pages 979-992.
    4. Senhu Wang & Shun Gong, 2024. "Gender‐role preference matters: How family policy dissemination affects marriage/fertility intentions," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2351-2370, November.
    5. Alessandro Di Nallo, 2025. "The partnership context of first parenthood – and how it varies by parental class and birth cohort in the United Kingdom," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(16), pages 465-510.
    6. Lu, Haiyang & Zeng, Keya & Hu, Weiliang, 2025. "Too busy with the “rat race” to have kids? Longitudinal evidence on the impact of peer grit on the fertility of reproductive-age women in China," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    7. Shengyuan Liang & Shanmin Liu & Canmian Liu, 2023. "Facilitating fertility decline through economic development: a principal-agent analysis of local bureaucratic incentives in China’s fertility transition," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Slätis, Victor, 2026. "The Modernity Trap : Structural Constraints on Fertility in Wealthy Democracies," SocArXiv xbe6p_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. Martin Klesment & Leen Rahnu & Luule Sakkeus & Allan Puur, 2014. "Varying association between education and second births in Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 31(27), pages 813-860.
    10. Sara Kalucza & Sergi Vidal & Karina Nilsson, 2021. "Intergenerational persistence of family formation trajectories among teenage-mothers and -fathers in Sweden," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 259-282, September.
    11. Martin Bujard, 2011. "Family Policy And Demographic Effects: The Case Of Germany," Demográfia, Hungarian Demographic Research Institute, vol. 54(5), pages 56-78.
    12. repec:osf:osfxxx:3qzy6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Kryštof Zeman & Eva Beaujouan & Zuzanna Brzozowska & Tomáš Sobotka, 2018. "Cohort fertility decline in low fertility countries: Decomposition using parity progression ratios," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(25), pages 651-690.
    14. Marcel Raab & Emanuela Struffolino, 2020. "The Heterogeneity of Partnership Trajectories to Childlessness in Germany," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(1), pages 53-70, March.
    15. Gøsta Esping-Andersen & Francesco C. Billari, 2015. "Re-theorizing Family Demographics," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 1-31, March.
    16. James Raymo & Brienna Perelli-Harris & Sojung Lim & Alicia VanOrman & Miho Iwasawa & Marcia Carlson, 2015. "Educational differences in early childbearing," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(3), pages 65-92.
    17. Zhongwu Li, 2023. "Does intrahousehold bargaining power enhance women's marital satisfaction? A perspective from two competing forces in China," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 476-498, February.
    18. Frances Goldscheider & Eva Bernhardt & Trude Lappegård, 2015. "The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(2), pages 207-239, June.
    19. Katarzyna Lubiewska & Marta Żegleń & Karolina Głogowska & Nebi Sümer & Yanina Kashuba, 2025. "Buffering and ambiguity effects of maternal warmth on associations between psychological control and child attachment in a cross-national perspective," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Sigle, Wendy, 2021. "Demography’s theory and approach: (how) has the view from the margins changed?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112467, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Allan Puur & Luule Sakkeus & Asta Põldma & Anne Herm, 2011. "Intergenerational family constellations in contemporary Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 25(4), pages 135-172.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:45:y:2021:i:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.