IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2025i1p5-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Farms Development and Succession Planning – a PLS-SEM Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Marius Ogrezeanu

    (University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Alexandru Capatina

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

  • Cristina Bianca Pocol

    (University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of Human Resource Management (HRM) practices on farm development, employer branding, and succession planning in the agricultural sector. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the research analyzes data from farm owners across different geographical regions to explore the relationships between HR strategies, workforce challenges, and long-term business sustainability. The findings highlight that effective recruitment, selection, and employee retention strategies significantly influence farm expansion, workforce motivation, and investment in training programs. Additionally, the study confirms a strong correlation between farm development intentions and succession planning, demonstrating that farmers with a strategic growth mindset are more likely to engage in structured succession planning. Employer branding and retention policies are key determinants of workforce stability, reinforcing that farms perceived as attractive employers are better positioned to retain skilled employees and ensure business continuity. While HRM challenges have a moderate but statistically insignificant negative impact on employer branding, farmers often mitigate these issues through adaptive strategies such as seasonal workforce collaborations. The study’s practical implications suggest that policymakers and agricultural stakeholders should develop targeted HR support programs to enhance employee retention and succession planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius Ogrezeanu & Alexandru Capatina & Cristina Bianca Pocol, 2025. "The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Farms Development and Succession Planning – a PLS-SEM Approach," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 5-12.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2025:i:1:p:5-12
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2025_1/Ogrezeanu_et_al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35219/eai15840409481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Abid Shahzad & Syed Abubakr & Christian Fischer, 2021. "Factors Affecting Farm Succession and Occupational Choices of Nominated Farm Successors in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Arkadiusz Kijek & Tomasz Kijek & Anna Nowak, 2020. "Club convergence of labour productivity in agriculture: Evidence from EU countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(9), pages 391-401.
    3. Bojnec, Štefan & Fertő, Imre, 2022. "Do different types of Common Agricultural Policy subsidies promote farm employment?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Isabel Dinis, 2023. "Exploring the Drivers of Microregional Agricultural Labor Productivity: Empirical Insights from Portugal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Hana URBANCOVA & Petr RICHTER & Lenka KUCIRKOVA & Martina JARKOVSKA, 2017. "Employer branding in the agricultural sector: making a company attractive for the potential employees," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(5), pages 217-227.
    6. Sheridan, Alison & Newsome, Lucie & Howard, Tanya & Lawson, Andrew & Saunders, Skye, 2021. "Intergenerational farm succession: How does gender fit?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Wayne H. Howard & Kenneth A. McEwan, 1989. "Human Resource Management: A Review with Applications to Agriculture," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 37(4), pages 733-742, December.
    8. Giannakis, Elias & Bruggeman, Adriana, 2018. "Exploring the labour productivity of agricultural systems across European regions: A multilevel approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 94-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiangqiang Zhang & Jiaying Tian & Jie Zheng & Nazir Muhammad Abdullahi & Xuexi Huo, 2022. "How Does Land Tenure Security Affect Farm Succession? Evidence from Apple Growers in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Georgieva, Vanya & Guerov, Gueorgui & Blagoeva, Nadezhda, 2024. "Impact of economic and environmental factors on agricultural product pricing in the EU," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(4), December.
    3. Baležentis, Tomas & Li, Tianxiang & Chen, Xueli, 2021. "Has agricultural labor restructuring improved agricultural labor productivity in China? A decomposition approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Alina Botezat & Mihaela David & Cristian Incaltarau & Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "The Illusion of Urbanization: Impact of Administrative Reform on Communities’ Resilience," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 44(1), pages 33-84, January.
    5. Stylianou, Andreas & Sdrali, Despina & Apostolopoulos, Constantinos D., 2020. "Capturing the diversity of Mediterranean farming systems prior to their sustainability assessment: The case of Cyprus," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Thomas I. Chacko & John G. Wacker & Mohamad Mahdy Asar, 1997. "Technological and human resource management practices in addressing perceived competitiveness in agribusiness firms," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 93-105.
    7. Jeffrey, Scott R., 1997. "Is There Room for People in Farm Management Education?," 11th Congress, University of Calgary, Canada, July 14-19, 1997 346445, International Farm Management Association.
    8. Yungang Tang & Haojie Liao & Ye Wu & Gang Lei, 2024. "Unravelling the bidirectional impact of Chinese agricultural subsidy policy on agricultural efficiency and farmers' income through panel data analysis," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(4), pages 165-177.
    9. Zhang, Qi & Gong, Jian & Wang, Ying, 2024. "How resilience capacity and multiple shocks affect rural households’ subjective well-being: A comparative study of the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Chivu, Luminita & Andrei, Jean Vasile & Zaharia, Marian & Gogonea, Rodica-Manuela, 2020. "A regional agricultural efficiency convergence assessment in Romania – Appraising differences and understanding potentials," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Neves, Ana Paula Vieira & Vaz, Fabiano Nunes & Brandão, Janaína Balk & Boscardin, Mariele, 2024. "Socio-professional insertion of women in beef cattle in Brazil," Agroalimentaria Journal - Revista Agroalimentaria, Centro de Investigaciones Agroalimentarias, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Universidad de los Andes, vol. 30(58), June.
    12. Anna Nowak & Armand Kasztelan, 2022. "Economic competitiveness vs. green competitiveness of agriculture in the European Union countries," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(2), pages 379-405, June.
    13. Mutiu A. Oyinlola & Abdulfatai A. Adedeji & Nafisat Olabisi, 2021. "Technology, energy use, and agricultural value addition nexus: an exploratory analysis from SSA countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 457-490, May.
    14. Joanna Bereznicka & Ludwik Wicki, 2021. "Do Farm Subsidies Improve Labour Efficiency in Farms in EU Countries?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2 - Part ), pages 925-937.
    15. Łukasz Kryszak & Thomas Herzfeld, 2021. "One or many European models of agriculture? How heterogeneity influences income creation among farms in the European Union," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(11), pages 445-456.
    16. Antonella Basso & Maria Bruna Zolin, 2023. "Analyzing the land and labour productivity of farms producing renewable energy: the Italian case study," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 153-172, April.
    17. Maró, Zalán Márk & Borda, Áron József & Balogh, Jeremiás Máté, 2024. "Challenges and Trends in Agricultural Employment: The Case of Hungary," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 16(4), December.
    18. Arkadiusz Kijek & Tomasz Kijek & Anna Nowak, 2020. "Club convergence of labour productivity in agriculture: Evidence from EU countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(9), pages 391-401.
    19. Na Xu & Liqin Zhang & Xiyuan Leng, 2022. "Sustainable Food Production from a Labor Supply Perspective: Policies and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    20. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:925-937 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Francisco Manuel Martínez García & Ana Nieto Masot & Gema Cárdenas Alonso & José Manuel Pérez Pintor, 2023. "The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in Extremadura (SW Spain) during the Period 2014–2020:New Opportunities for Economic Diversification in Rural Areas?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2025:i:1:p:5-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.