IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v11y2017i1p99-115.html

Family And Children In Anglophone Legal Culture: A Way To Understand The Global Age

Author

Listed:
  • Horea Crisan

Abstract

As Anglophone legal method comes to predominate in a regimen of global law, it is useful to examine its approach to family and children. Such matters as the nature of family and mode of childhood training have been fundamental to its operation for several hundred years. One way to understand its approach today is to examine its development in the past. The paper begins by discussing three levels of English legal culture: hereditary, professed, and individuated. It examines how these legal stratum correlate to the three rankings of nobility, middle class, and laboring multitude. It touches on the different modes of education employed to prepare the children of each group for their self-understanding and for their place in the world. The paper then discusses how these patterns of differentiation are rooted certain medieval traditions that began with the imposition of Norman Kingship in the eleventh century. It explains how the Common law grew out of that tradition, how that law developed, and how its medieval attributes survived into the modern world. It examines how the rise of a merchant class became assimilated to the Common law, and how both strands of development were influenced by two modes of learning: Ciceronian and Calvinist. The paper discusses how, in the nineteenth century, a Formalized English law came to be implanted in the United States. It examines how a unique Anglo-American legality emerged, and how it began to influence the nature of family and raising of children. It explains how the three stratum of English class fit into this legal regime and how it prepared each rising generation to enter a legally administered world. Finally, the paper discusses how twenty-first century technology shapes Anglophone legal culture, as America becomes the harbinger and hegemon of its global project. Laboring families are atomized, adults individuated, and children are socialized by transmitted sound and image. The conclusion asks what effect these changes have on the hereditary, professed, individuated, and children under a global Rule of Law.

Suggested Citation

  • Horea Crisan, 2017. "Family And Children In Anglophone Legal Culture: A Way To Understand The Global Age," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 99-115, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:99-115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/296-Article-Text-572-1-10-20170608.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin J. Cohen, 2008. "Introduction to International Political Economy: An Intellectual History," Introductory Chapters, in: International Political Economy: An Intellectual History, Princeton University Press.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Braun, 2016. "From performativity to political economy: index investing, ETFs and asset manager capitalism," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 257-273, May.
    2. Gregory Chin & Margaret M. Pearson & Wang Yong, 2013. "Introduction - IPE with China's characteristics," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 1145-1164, December.
    3. Von Furstenberg, George M., 2008. "Performance Measurement under Rational International Overpromising Regimes," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 261-287, December.
    4. Benjamin J. Cohen, 2009. "A Grave Case of Myopia," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 436-444, November.
    5. Toke S. Aidt & Facundo Albornoz & Esther Hauk, 2019. "Foreign in influence and domestic policy: A survey," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1928, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    6. John M. Hobson, 2013. "Part 1 - Revealing the Eurocentric foundations of IPE: A critical historiography of the discipline from the classical to the modern era," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 1024-1054, October.
    7. Simon Glaze, 2015. "Schools Out: Adam Smith and Pre-disciplinary International Political Economy," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 679-701, October.
    8. Koddenbrock, Kai, 2017. "What money does: An inquiry into the backbone of capitalist political economy," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    9. Russell, Jesse, 2012. "Ethical crises in the international political economy," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 843-848.
    10. Toke S. Aidt & Facundo Albornoz & Esther Hauk, 2021. "Foreign Influence and Domestic Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 426-487, June.
    11. Jeffrey M. Chwieroth & Timothy J. Sinclair, 2013. "How you stand depends on how we see: International capital mobility as social fact," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 457-485, June.
    12. Dimos Chatzinikolaou & Charis Michael Vlados, 2024. "International Political Economy, Business Ecosystems, Entrepreneurship, and Sustainability: A Synthesis on the Case of the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Sarah Eaton & Zhang Yuxuan, 2008. "Dragon on a Short Leash : An Inside-Out Analysis of China Investment Corporation," Finance Working Papers 22834, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    14. André Moreira Cunha & Julimar Da Silva Bichara & Marcos Tadeu Caputi Lélis & Julien Marcel Demeulemeester, 2016. "Brazil´S Development Pattern In A Sino-Centred World: An International Political Economy Perspective," Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 079, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    15. Geoffrey R D Underhill, 2007. "Markets, Institutions, and Transaction Costs: The Endogeneity of Governance," WEF Working Papers 0025, ESRC World Economy and Finance Research Programme, Birkbeck, University of London.
    16. Erin Lockwood, 2021. "The international political economy of global inequality," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 421-445, March.
    17. Betz, Timm & Pond, Amy, 2025. "Liberalization," SocArXiv ugqnx_v1, Center for Open Science.
    18. Jessica L. Darby & David J. Ketchen & Brent D. Williams & Travis Tokar, 2020. "The Implications of Firm‐Specific Policy Risk, Policy Uncertainty, and Industry Factors for Inventory: A Resource Dependence Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 3-24, October.
    19. Jeremy Green & Colin Hay, 2015. "Towards a New Political Economy of the Crisis: Getting What Went Wrong Right," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 331-341, June.
    20. John M. Hobson, 2013. "Part 2 - Reconstructing the non-Eurocentric foundations of IPE: From Eurocentric 'open economy politics' to inter-civilizational political economy," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 1055-1081, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • K36 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Family and Personal Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:99-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.