IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/das/njaigs/v6y2024i1p258-288id251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Predictive Analytics in Business Intelligence through Explainable AI: A Case Study in Financial Products

Author

Listed:
  • Sreenivasarao Amirineni

Abstract

Today, when the importance of data-based decision-making is impossible to question, the use of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in business intelligence (BI) has inestimable benefits for the financial industry. This paper discusses how XAI influences predictive analytics in BI systems and how it may improve interpretability, and useful suggestions for financial product companies. Thus, within the context of this study, an XAI framework helps the financial institutions to employ higher-performing and more accurate models, like gradient boosting and neural networks, while sustaining interpretability required in tendentious planning and satisfying governance and supervision necessities. These studies reveal that, as applied to the credit scoring dilemma, XAI techniques such as SHAP and LIME do not only enhance prediction consistency and performance, but also offer a detailed understanding of customer behaviours, risk profiles and product performance. They help in interacting and acting within fields that involve decision making on aspects like customer loyalty, probable risks and audit. Furthermore, the study establishes that by incorporating XAI into BI improves model interpretability, which helps financial experts provide tangible rationale for analytical results and conform to regulatory directives. This framework and findings also support the importance of introducing XAI for financial BI applications to improve analytics practice within the sector. , enabling the generation of higher confidence, reliable decisions, which place the subject of XAI as a profound evolution of business intelligence in finance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sreenivasarao Amirineni, 2024. "Enhancing Predictive Analytics in Business Intelligence through Explainable AI: A Case Study in Financial Products," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 6(1), pages 258-288.
  • Handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:258-288:id:251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/article/view/251
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Di Wu, 2024. "Bitcoin ETF: Opportunities and risk," Papers 2409.00270, arXiv.org.
    2. Vermeulen, Patrick, 2004. "Managing Product Innovation in Financial Services Firms," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 43-50, February.
    3. Henderson, Brian J. & Pearson, Neil D., 2011. "The dark side of financial innovation: A case study of the pricing of a retail financial product," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 227-247, May.
    4. Storey, Chris & Easingwood, Christopher J., 1999. "Types of New Product Performance: Evidence from the Consumer Financial Services Sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 193-203, October.
    5. Di Wu, 2024. "The effects of data preprocessing on probability of default model fairness," Papers 2408.15452, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nima Heirati & Aron O’Cass, 2016. "Supporting new product commercialization through managerial social ties and market knowledge development in an emerging economy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 411-433, June.
    2. Rubtsov, Alexey, 2016. "Model misspecification and pricing of illiquid claims," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 242-249.
    3. Mehmet Balcilar & Riza Demirer, 2014. "The Effect of Global Shocks and Volatility on Herd Behavior in Borsa Istanbul," BIFEC Book of Abstracts & Proceedings, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 1(2), pages 142-172, March.
    4. Schertler, Andrea, 2016. "Pricing effects when competitors arrive: The case of discount certificates in Germany," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 84-99.
    5. Junyong He & Helen Hui Huang & Shunming Zhang, 2020. "Ambiguity Aversion, Information Acquisition, and Market Opacity," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 21(2), pages 263-329, November.
    6. Stephen G Dimmock & Roy Kouwenberg & Olivia S Mitchell & Kim Peijnenburg, 2021. "Household Portfolio Underdiversification and Probability Weighting: Evidence from the Field," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(9), pages 4524-4563.
    7. Md. Qamruzzaman & Rajnish Kler, 2023. "Do Clean Energy and Financial Innovation Induce SME Performance? Clarifying the Nexus between Financial Innovation, Technological Innovation, Clean Energy, Environmental Degradation, and SMEs Performa," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 313-324, May.
    8. Murizah Osman Salleh & Aziz Jaafar & M. Shahid Ebrahim, 2011. "The Inhibition of Usury (Riba An-Nasi'ah) and the Economic Underdevelopment of the Muslim World," Working Papers 11002, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    9. Ivan Diaz-Rainey & John Ashton & Maz Yap & Murat Genc & Rosalind Whiting, 2015. "The determinants of regulatory responses to risks from financial innovation: Survey evidence from G20," Working Papers 15001, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    10. Kosfeld, Michael & Schüwer, Ulrich, 2011. "Add-on Pricing, Naive Consumers, and the Hidden Welfare Costs of Education," CEPR Discussion Papers 8636, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Riikkinen, Mikko & Pihlajamaa, Matti, 2022. "Achieving a strategic fit in fintech collaboration – A case study of Nordea Bank," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 461-472.
    12. Daniel Bauer & Thorsten Moenig, 2023. "Cheaper by the bundle: The interaction of frictions and option exercise in variable annuities," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(2), pages 459-486, June.
    13. Hans‐Theo Normann & Tobias Wenzel, 2019. "Shrouding Add‐On Information: An Experimental Study," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 121(4), pages 1705-1727, October.
    14. Yiquan Gu & Tobias Wenzel, 2014. "Strategic Obfuscation and Consumer Protection Policy," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 632-660, December.
    15. W. Scott Frame & Lawrence J. White, 2009. "Technological change, financial innovation, and diffusion in banking," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2009-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    16. Christian Bauer & Marc Oliver Rieger, 2021. "The Slow Death of Capital Protection," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-8, July.
    17. Entrop, Oliver & Fischer, Georg, 2019. "Hedging costs and joint determinants of premiums and spreads in structured financial products," Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Betriebswirtschaftliche Reihe B-34-19, University of Passau, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    18. Baller, Stefanie & Entrop, Oliver & McKenzie, Michael & Wilkens, Marco, 2016. "Market makers’ optimal price-setting policy for exchange-traded certificates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 206-226.
    19. Shuiwen Gao & Haifeng Gu & Guillermo Andres Buitrago & Habiba Halepoto, 2023. "Will Off-Balance-Sheet Business Innovation Affect Bank Risk-Taking under the Background of Financial Technology?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Brad M. Barber & Xing Huang & Terrance Odean & Christopher Schwarz, 2022. "Attention‐Induced Trading and Returns: Evidence from Robinhood Users," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(6), pages 3141-3190, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:258-288:id:251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Open Knowledge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.