IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvv/journ6/v8y2021i4p190-202.html

Strategies to prevent pandemics similar to Covid-19

Author

Listed:
  • Mario COCCIA

Abstract

This study proposes strategies to prevent future pandemics based on lessons learned from COVID-19. It emphasizes early detection, global cooperation, and investment in public health infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario COCCIA, 2021. "Strategies to prevent pandemics similar to Covid-19," Journal of Economics Bibliography, EconSciences Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 190-202, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cvv:journ6:v:8:y:2021:i:4:p:190-202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEB/article/view/2264/2272
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEB/article/view/2264
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher M. Weible & Daniel Nohrstedt & Paul Cairney & David P. Carter & Deserai A. Crow & Anna P. Durnová & Tanya Heikkila & Karin Ingold & Allan McConnell & Diane Stone, 2020. "COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 225-241, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Debus & Jale Tosun, 2021. "Political ideology and vaccination willingness: implications for policy design," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 477-491, September.
    2. Witold Klaus, 2021. "The Porous Border Woven with Prejudices and Economic Interests. Polish Border Admission Practices in the Time of COVID-19," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Van Thanh Vu, 2021. "Public Trust in Government and Compliance with Policy during COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 779-796, December.
    4. Miao, Qing & Schwarz, Susan & Schwarz, Gary, 2021. "Responding to COVID-19: Community volunteerism and coproduction in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Pärli, Rea & Byamungu, Moustapha & Fischer, Manuel & Kantengwa, Speciose & Kintche, Kokou & Konlambigue, Matieyedou & Lieberherr, Eva & Six, Johan & Wilde, Benjamin & Späth, Leonhard, 2024. "“The reality in the DRC is just not the reality in Rwanda” – How context factors affect transdisciplinary research projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(7).
    6. Yufang Gao & Susan G. Clark, 2025. "A value-centered approach to developing grand strategy for human-wildlife coexistence," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(4), pages 835-858, December.
    7. Maximilian Filsinger & Markus Freitag, 2022. "Pandemic threat and authoritarian attitudes in Europe: An empirical analysis of the exposure to COVID-19," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(3), pages 417-436, September.
    8. Fillaili, Rizki & Tamyis, Ana Rosidha & Mawardi, Sulton & Sawiji, Hening Wikan, 2022. "Impact and Coping Strategies among Vulnerable Groups: An Urban-Rural Resilience Trajectory of the COVID-19 Pandemic," MPRA Paper 123546, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Sharon Elhadad & Udi Sommer, 2022. "Policy diffusion in federal systems during a state of emergency: diffusion of COVID-19 statewide lockdown policies across the United States," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-28.
    10. Colin C. H. Law & Rungkaew Katekaew, 2022. "COVID-19: ASEAN Aviation Policy and the Significance of Intra-regional Connectivity," Journal of Asian Economic Integration, , vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Thang Muan Piang, 2022. "Working from home during the Covid-19 pandemic and its effect on employees and students," Eximia Journal, Plus Communication Consulting SRL, vol. 5(1), pages 195-240, July.
    12. Paola Mattei & Lorenzo Vigevano, 2021. "Contingency Planning and Early Crisis Management: Italy and the COVID-19 Pandemic," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 647-663, December.
    13. Atkinson, P. & Gobat, N. & Lant, S. & Mableson, H. & Pilbeam, C. & Solomon, T. & Tonkin-Crine, S. & Sheard, S., 2020. "Understanding the policy dynamics of COVID-19 in the UK: Early findings from interviews with policy makers and health care professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    14. Ishani Mukherjee & M. Kerem Coban & Azad Singh Bali, 2021. "Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(2), pages 243-268, June.
    15. Alan McNiven & John Harris, 2023. "Community and the voluntary sector in a pandemic: The significant role of a local football club," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 312-326, June.
    16. Ahmed Maged Nofal & Gabriella Cacciotti & Nick Lee, 2020. "Who complies with COVID-19 transmission mitigation behavioral guidelines?," Post-Print hal-02962370, HAL.
    17. Lihuan Guo & Wei Wang & Yenchun Jim Wu, 2023. "What Do Scholars Propose for Future COVID-19 Research in Academic Publications? A Topic Analysis Based on Autoencoder," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    18. John Hogan & Michael Howlett & Mary Murphy, 2022. "Re-thinking the coronavirus pandemic as a policy punctuation: COVID-19 as a path-clearing policy accelerator [Punctuating the equilibrium: An application of policy theory to COVID-19]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(1), pages 40-52.
    19. Anna P. Durnová & Christopher M. Weible, 2020. "Tempest in a teapot? Toward new collaborations between mainstream policy process studies and interpretive policy studies," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 571-588, September.
    20. Xiaoling Yuan & Caijuan Li & Kai Zhao & Xiaoyu Xu, 2021. "The Changing Patterns of Consumers’ Behavior in China: A Comparison during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvv:journ6:v:8:y:2021:i:4:p:190-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEB .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.