IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v23y2022i3p417-436.html

Pandemic threat and authoritarian attitudes in Europe: An empirical analysis of the exposure to COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilian Filsinger

    (Institute of Political Science, 111829University of Bern, Switzerland)

  • Markus Freitag

    (Institute of Political Science, 111829University of Bern, Switzerland)

Abstract

While analysis of the impact of threatening events has moved from bit player to center stage in political science in recent decades, the phenomenon of pandemic threat is widely neglected in terms of a systematic research agenda. Tying together insights from the behavioral immune system hypothesis and standard political science models of emotional processing, we evaluate whether exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic threat is related to authoritarian attitudes and which emotions do the work. Using 12 samples with over 12,000 respondents from six European countries at two time points (2020 and 2021), we argue that pandemic threats can generate disgust, anger, and fear. Our analyses indicate that exposure to the COVID-19 pandemic threat particularly activates fear, which in turn is linked to authoritarian attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilian Filsinger & Markus Freitag, 2022. "Pandemic threat and authoritarian attitudes in Europe: An empirical analysis of the exposure to COVID-19," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(3), pages 417-436, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:3:p:417-436
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165221082517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165221082517
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165221082517?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aarøe, Lene & Petersen, Michael Bang & Arceneaux, Kevin, 2017. "The Behavioral Immune System Shapes Political Intuitions: Why and How Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity Underlie Opposition to Immigration," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 111(2), pages 277-294, May.
    2. Francesco Iacoella & Patricia Justino & Bruno Martorano, 2021. "Do pandemics lead to rebellion? Policy responses to COVID-19, inequality, and protests in the USA," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2021-57, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Leonie Huddy & Stanley Feldman & Charles Taber & Gallya Lahav, 2005. "Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Policies," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(3), pages 593-608, July.
    4. Christopher M. Weible & Daniel Nohrstedt & Paul Cairney & David P. Carter & Deserai Anderson & Anna P. Durnová & Tanya Heikkila & Karin Ingold & Allan McConnell & Diane Stone, 2020. "COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 225-241, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang Meng & Fen Lin, 2025. "Authoritarian Backsliding? Public Support for Liberty Restricting Policies During COVID-19: A Cross-National Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 697-728, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Plümper & Eric Neumayer & Katharina Gabriela Pfaff, 2021. "The strategy of protest against Covid‐19 containment policies in Germany," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2236-2250, September.
    2. Marc Debus & Jale Tosun, 2021. "Political ideology and vaccination willingness: implications for policy design," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 477-491, September.
    3. Witold Klaus, 2021. "The Porous Border Woven with Prejudices and Economic Interests. Polish Border Admission Practices in the Time of COVID-19," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Pärli, Rea & Byamungu, Moustapha & Fischer, Manuel & Kantengwa, Speciose & Kintche, Kokou & Konlambigue, Matieyedou & Lieberherr, Eva & Six, Johan & Wilde, Benjamin & Späth, Leonhard, 2024. "“The reality in the DRC is just not the reality in Rwanda” – How context factors affect transdisciplinary research projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(7).
    5. Yufang Gao & Susan G. Clark, 2025. "A value-centered approach to developing grand strategy for human-wildlife coexistence," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 58(4), pages 835-858, December.
    6. Aaron R Kaufman & Eitan D Hersh, 2020. "The political consequences of opioid overdoses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Patricia Justino, 2022. "Revisiting the links between economic inequality and political violence: The role of social mobilization," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-19, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Isabel Ruiz & Carlos Vargas-Silva, 2021. "The Anxiety of Political Uncertainty: Insights from the Brexit Vote," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 697(1), pages 81-98, September.
    9. Justino, Patricia, 2025. "Revisiting the links between economic inequality and political violence: The role of social mobilization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    10. Dražanová, Lenka & Gonnot, Jérôme & Heidland, Tobias & Krüger, Finja, 2022. "Understanding differences in attitudes to immigration: A meta-analysis of individual-level factors," Kiel Working Papers 2235, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    11. Paola Mattei & Lorenzo Vigevano, 2021. "Contingency Planning and Early Crisis Management: Italy and the COVID-19 Pandemic," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 647-663, December.
    12. Daniele Guariso, 2018. "Terrorist Attacks and Immigration Rhetoric: A Natural Experiment on British MPs," Working Paper Series 1218, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    13. C. Caporali & F. Crudu & C. Detotto, 2024. "Terror and Turnout: The Impact of Terrorism During the Years of Lead," Working Paper CRENoS 202426, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    14. Emilio Colombo & Valentina Rotondi & Luca Stanca, 2022. "The Day After the Bomb: Well-Being Effects of Terrorist Attacks in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 115-132, February.
    15. Lihuan Guo & Wei Wang & Yenchun Jim Wu, 2023. "What Do Scholars Propose for Future COVID-19 Research in Academic Publications? A Topic Analysis Based on Autoencoder," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    16. Fachter, Shani & Schiavo, Gianluca & Snider, Keren LG. & Cappelletti, Alessandro & Stock, Oliviero & Weiss, Patrice L. & Zancanaro, Massimo & Canetti, Daphna, 2021. "“Come and share a story with me”: Promoting engagement between Ethiopian and Non-Ethiopian Israelis via joint digital narratives," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    17. Xiaoling Yuan & Caijuan Li & Kai Zhao & Xiaoyu Xu, 2021. "The Changing Patterns of Consumers’ Behavior in China: A Comparison during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Seonho Shin, 2021. "Were they a shock or an opportunity?: The heterogeneous impacts of the 9/11 attacks on refugees as job seekers—a nonlinear multi-level approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 2827-2864, November.
    19. Marion de Vries & Liesbeth Claassen & Marcel Mennen & Aura Timen & Margreet J. M. te Wierik & Danielle R. M. Timmermans, 2019. "Public Perceptions of Contentious Risk: The Case of Rubber Granulate in the Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Adam M. Enders & Jason Gainous & Kevin M. Wagner, 2022. "Say it again with feeling: Issue ownership and candidate communication using Twitter," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(4), pages 959-974, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:23:y:2022:i:3:p:417-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.