IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v180y2025i2d10.1007_s11205-025-03689-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Authoritarian Backsliding? Public Support for Liberty Restricting Policies During COVID-19: A Cross-National Study

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang Meng

    (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

  • Fen Lin

    (City University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that both trust in government and individuals’ emotional states increase public support for liberty restricting policies during COVID-19, raising concerns about the prospects for democracy. However, it remains unclear how specific emotions such as worry about COVID-19 interplay with governmental trust, and whether these dynamics operate similarly across different regimes. To address these questions, this study analyzes cross-regional two-wave panel data from Singapore, Hong Kong, and South Korea, as well as cross-sectional data from the U.S. and the U.K. Findings reveal a robust “delinking effect” of worry: heightened worry about the pandemic undermines the positive effect of governmental trust on individual support for liberty restricting policies. Notably, the threshold at which worry nullifies the effect of governmental trust varies across contexts. The theoretical and political implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang Meng & Fen Lin, 2025. "Authoritarian Backsliding? Public Support for Liberty Restricting Policies During COVID-19: A Cross-National Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 697-728, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:180:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03689-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03689-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-025-03689-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-025-03689-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:180:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03689-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.