IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jhisec/v31y2009i03p281-304_99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

John Stuart Mill And The Employment Of Married Women: Reconciling Utility And Justice

Author

Listed:
  • SIGOT, NATHALIE
  • BEAURAIN, CHRISTOPHE

Abstract

This paper explores the link between utilitarianism and feminism through the positions of John Stuart Mill. We try to reconcile Mill's conviction about the necessity of establishing equality between sexes with his position concerning the employment of married women. This reconciliation has already been attempted by other researchers. Our perspective is slightly different in that we seek to establish a globally coherent position by examining Mill's various writings in order to evaluate his feminism in terms of his utilitarian philosophy.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Sigot, Nathalie & Beaurain, Christophe, 2009. "John Stuart Mill And The Employment Of Married Women: Reconciling Utility And Justice," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 281-304, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:31:y:2009:i:03:p:281-304_99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1053837209990046/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven G. Medema, 2007. "The Hesitant Hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the Evolution of the Theory of Market Failure," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 331-358, Fall.
    2. Michèle A. Pujol, 1992. "Feminism And Anti-Feminism In Early Economic Thought," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 362.
    3. Robert W. Dimand & Evelyn L. Forget & Chris Nyland, 2004. "Retrospectives: Gender in Classical Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(1), pages 229-240, Winter.
    4. Ronald Bodkin, 1999. "Women's Agency In Classical Economic Thought: Adam Smith, Harriet Taylor Mill, And J. S. Mill," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 45-60.
    5. Mendus, Susan, 1994. "John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor on Women and Marriage," Utilitas, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 287-299, November.
    6. Steven G. Medema, 2004. "Mill, Sidgwick, and the Evolution of the Concept of Market Failure," CAE Working Papers 03, Aix-Marseille Université, CERGAM.
    7. Robert Dimand & Chris Nyland (ed.), 2003. "The Status of Women in Classical Economic Thought," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2229.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Giordano, 2013. "Free Labour, Free Women. Re-appraising Harriet Taylor?s Feminist Economics," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 45-62.
    2. Giandomenica Becchio, 2018. "Gender, Feminist and Heterodox Economics: Interconnections and Differences in a Historical Perspective," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 5-24, March.
    3. Alison Bashford, 2022. "Malthus and gender," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 198-210, November.
    4. Virginie Gouverneur, 2018. "John Stuart Mill on Wage Inequalities Between Men and Women," Working Papers 07-18, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    5. Robert W. Dimand & Evelyn L. Forget & Chris Nyland, 2004. "Retrospectives: Gender in Classical Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(1), pages 229-240, Winter.
    6. Astrid Agenjo‐Calderón & Lina Gálvez‐Muñoz, 2019. "Feminist Economics: Theoretical and Political Dimensions," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 137-166, January.
    7. Biesecker, Adelheid & Hofmeister, Sabine, 2010. "Focus: (Re)productivity: Sustainable relations both between society and nature and between the genders," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1703-1711, June.
    8. Sarah F. Small, 2023. "Infusing Diversity in a History of Economic Thought Course: An Archival Study of Syllabi and Resources for Redesign," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 276-311, June.
    9. Gillian Hewitson, 2001. "A Survey of Feminist Economics," Working Papers 2001.01, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    10. Giovanni Razzu & Carl Singleton & Mark Mitchell, 2020. "On why the gender employment gap in Britain has stalled since the early 1990s," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 476-501, November.
    11. Ronald Bodkin, 1999. "Women's Agency In Classical Economic Thought: Adam Smith, Harriet Taylor Mill, And J. S. Mill," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 45-60.
    12. Virginie Gouverneur, 2021. "Family and Women in Alfred Marshall’s Analysis of Progress and Well-being," Working Papers of BETA 2021-03, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    13. Robert Dimand, 1999. "Minnie Throop England On Crises And Cycles: A Neglected Early Macroeconomist," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 107-126.
    14. Elizabeth Moorhouse, 2013. "Examining the Unique Characteristics of Economics: A Description of a Student Assignment," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 113-121, March.
    15. Virginie Gouverneur, 2013. "Mill versus Jevons on traditional sexual division of labour: Is gender equality efficient?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 741-775, October.
    16. Mohammadhosein Bahmanpour-Khalesi & Mohammadjavad Sharifzadeh, 2023. "Public Finance or Public Choice? The Scholastic Political Economy As an Essentialist Synthesis," Papers 2306.11049, arXiv.org.
    17. Virginie Gouverneur, 2021. "Family and Women in Alfred Marshall’s Analysis of Progress and Well-being," Working Papers 02-21, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    18. Mellor, Mary, 1997. "Women, nature and the social construction of 'economic man'," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 129-140, February.
    19. Michele A. Pujol & Janet A. Seiz, 2000. "Harriet Taylor Mill," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(2), pages 476-479, May.
    20. Marianne Ferber, 1997. "Book Reviews," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 340-343.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jhisec:v:31:y:2009:i:03:p:281-304_99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/het .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.