IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v24y1992i01p251-260_02.html

Import Demands For U.S. Fresh Grapefruit: Effect Of U.S. Promotion Programs And Trade Policies Of Importing Nations

Author

Listed:
  • Fuller, Stephen
  • Bello, Haruna
  • Capps, Oral

Abstract

This study estimated import demands for U.S. fresh grapefruit in Japan, France, Canada, and the Netherlands. Historically, these nations have imported about 90 percent of U.S. grapefruit exports. Four import demand functions were specified and estimated by joint generalized least squares based on the sample period 19691 to 1988IV. Results show that U.S. FOB price, per capita income of importing countries, exchange rates, price of substitutes, U.S. grapefruit promotion programs, and removal of trade restrictions have had an important effect on U.S. fresh grapefruit exports. Analyses suggest that U.S. producers can effectively promote fresh grapefruit in foreign markets, and that trade concessions have an important influence on grapefruit exports.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuller, Stephen & Bello, Haruna & Capps, Oral, 1992. "Import Demands For U.S. Fresh Grapefruit: Effect Of U.S. Promotion Programs And Trade Policies Of Importing Nations," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 251-260, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:24:y:1992:i:01:p:251-260_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200026169/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laxmi Paudel & Murali Adhikari & Jack E. Houston & Henry W. Kinnucan, 2004. "Assessing the efficiency of exchange rate-linked subsidies (ERLS) for non-price export promotion: The case of cotton," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 481-493.
    2. Onunkwo, Izuchukwu M. & Epperson, James E., 2000. "Export Demand For U.S. Walnuts: Impacts Of U.S. Export Promotion Programs," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1-7, November.
    3. Paudel, Laxmi & Adhikari, Murali & Houston, Jack E. & Kinnucan, Henry W., 2002. "Assessing The Efficiency Of Exchange Rate-Linked Subsidies For Non-Price Export Promotion: The Case Of Cotton," Faculty Series 16658, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    4. Cong Tru Le & Harry M. Kaiser & William Tomek, 1998. "Export promotion and import demand for US red meat in selected Pacific Rim countries," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(2), pages 95-105.
    5. Karen Halliburton & Shida Rastegari Henneberry, 1993. "US overseas promotion programs for peanuts: An examination of trade and market development," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(6), pages 569-583.
    6. Adhikari, Murali & Paudel, Laxmi & Houston, Jack E. & Paudel, Biswo Nath, 2003. "Measuring the Impacts of US Export Promotion Program for Wheat in Selected Importing Regions," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35161, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Amy Quark, 2015. "Agricultural commodity branding in the rise and decline of the US food regime: from product to place-based branding in the global cotton trade, 1955–2012," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(4), pages 777-793, December.
    8. Onunkwo, Izuchukwu M. & Epperson, James E., 2001. "Export Demand For U.S. Almonds: Impacts Of U.S. Export Promotion Programs," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(01), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Paudel, Laxmi & Adhikari, Murali & Houston, Jack E. & Kinnucan, Henry W., 2003. "Non-Price Promotion Impacts On Cotton And Soybeans Exports Under Exchange Rate Linked Subsidies," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21957, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Pimbucha Rusmevichientong & Harry M. Kaiser, 2009. "Measuring the effectiveness of U.S. rice export promotion programs," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 215-230.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:24:y:1992:i:01:p:251-260_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.