Implications of the Introduction of the Goods and Services Tax for Families in Canada
We use the Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System and the Canadian Family Expenditure Survey to investigate the welfare change for households, particularly those with children, attributable to the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in Canada. We calculate the welfare change by estimating the expenditure difference necessary to maintain pre-GST indirect utility. We find that two in three households and one in three low income households were made worse off by the introduction of the GST. The figures are similar for households with children. More specifically, the stated policy goal of increasing the welfare of low and middle income households was not achieved.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 36 (2010)
Issue (Month): 4 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://economics.ca/cpp/
|Order Information:|| Web: http://www.utpjournals.com/cpp/ Email: |
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Paul Blacklow & Ranjan Ray, 2002. "Optimal Commodity Taxes in Australia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 35(1), pages 45-54.
- Pendakur, K., 1999.
"Taking Prices Seriously in the Measurement of Inequality,"
dp99-7, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
- Pendakur, Krishna, 2002. "Taking prices seriously in the measurement of inequality," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 47-69, October.
- Thomas F. Crossley & Lori J. Curtis, 2006.
"Child Poverty In Canada,"
Review of Income and Wealth,
International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 52(2), pages 237-260, 06.
- Grady, Patrick, 1991. "The Distributional Impact of the Goods and Services Tax: A Reply to Gillespie," MPRA Paper 13246, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Grady, Patrick, 1990. "An Analysis of the Distributional Impact of the Goods and Services Tax," MPRA Paper 13144, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Creedy, John, 2001. "Tax Modelling," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 77(237), pages 189-202, June.
- Paul Blacklow & Ranjan Ray, 2003. "Intra-Household Resource Allocation, Consumer Preferences and Commodity Tax Reforms: Australian Evidence," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 79(247), pages 425-433, December.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:36:y:2010:i:4:p:503-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Prof. Werner Antweiler)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.