IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpn/umkeip/v14y2015i2p155-168.html

Reputation and regulations as market and non-market mechanisms to reduce bifurcated risk

Author

Listed:
  • Agata Adamska

    (Warsaw School of Economics)

  • Tomasz j. Dabrowski

    (Warsaw School of Economics)

Abstract

This paper presents a new concept of bifurcated risk and market and non-market mechanisms reducing the risk. Bifurcated risk occurs in different situations, and it is characterized by a disruption of the relationship between decision-making and the resulting consequences. The bifurcated risk is followed by a number of very negative consequences in the form of disturbances of institutional order and a decrease in the level of generalized trust which leads to an increase in transaction costs. Therefore, it is important to reduce this risk, by means of using various market and non-market mechanisms. This article presents two such mechanisms — reputation and regulations. Reputation reduces the bifurcated risk, because on one hand, it creates stimuli which discourage decision-makers from taking this risk, on the other hand helps to reduce information asymmetry, allowing entities susceptible to the effects of risks to avoid entering into relationships with entities which are the source of this risk. Regulations in turn play a greater role not in preventing the emergence of the bifurcated risk, but in mitigating the negative consequences associated with the risk. Reputation and regulations are complementary and as mechanisms to reduce the bifurcated risk can occur together.

Suggested Citation

  • Agata Adamska & Tomasz j. Dabrowski, 2015. "Reputation and regulations as market and non-market mechanisms to reduce bifurcated risk," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 14(2), pages 155-168, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpn:umkeip:v:14:y:2015:i:2:p:155-168
    DOI: 10.12775/EiP.2015.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2015.009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12775/EiP.2015.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoon, Eunsang & Guffey, Hugh J. & Kijewski, Valerie, 1993. "The effects of information and company reputation on intentions to buy a business service," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 215-228, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pires, Guilherme D. & Dean, Alison & Rehman, Muqqadas, 2015. "Using service logic to redefine exchange in terms of customer and supplier participation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 925-932.
    2. Pei, Zhi & Paswan, Audhesh & Yan, Ruiliang, 2014. "E-tailer׳s return policy, consumer׳s perception of return policy fairness and purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 249-257.
    3. Koesharijadi Koesharijadi, 2016. "Factors Affecting Loyalty Customer Services Banking Industry in East Java," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 168-168, May.
    4. Kevin Money & Anastasiya Saraeva & Irene Garnelo-Gomez & Stephen Pain & Carola Hillenbrand, 2017. "Corporate Reputation Past and Future: A Review and Integration of Existing Literature and a Framework for Future Research," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 193-211, November.
    5. Mariconda, Simone & Lurati, Francesco, 2015. "Does familiarity breed stability? The role of familiarity in moderating the effects of new information on reputation judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 957-964.
    6. Adriana Burlea‐Schiopoiu & Dragos Alexandru Balan, 2021. "Modelling the impact of corporate reputation on customers' behaviour," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1142-1156, May.
    7. Benjamin Pfister & Manfred Schwaiger & Tobias Morath, 2020. "Corporate reputation and the future cost of equity," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 343-384, April.
    8. Balboni, Bernardo, 2008. "Perceived corporate credibility as the emergent property of corporate reputation’s transmission process," MPRA Paper 7944, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Nitin Pangarkar & Jie Wu, 2013. "Alliance formation, partner diversity, and performance of Singapore startups," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 791-807, September.
    10. Ahmad Azmi M. Ariffin & Ehsaneh N.M. Nameghi & Amin Khakizadeh, 2013. "The Relationship between Airlines’ Corporate Image and the Expectation toward Inflight Hospitality Services," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, October.
    11. Vitaliy Shkromyda & Taras Gnatiuk & Nadiya Shkromyda, 2022. "Evaluation of Indexes of Dynamism of Corporate Reputation in Conditions of Behavioral Economy," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(2), pages 81-93, May.
    12. Tae Choi & Jinchul Jung, 2008. "Ethical Commitment, Financial Performance, and Valuation: An Empirical Investigation of Korean Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 447-463, August.
    13. Payan, Janice M. & Nevin, John R., 2006. "Influence strategy efficacy in supplier-distributor relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 457-465, April.
    14. Tischer, Sven & Hildebrandt, Lutz, 2011. "Linking corporate reputation and shareholder value using the publication of reputation rankings," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-065, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    15. Nha Nguyen & Gaston LeBlanc, 2018. "The Combined Effects of Service Offering and Service Employees on the Perceived Corporate Reputation," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 4(2), pages 129-146, April.
    16. Kirkwood, Jodyanne & Gray, Brendan, 2009. "From entrepreneur to mayor: Assessing the impact of the founder’s changing reputation on Hubbard Foods Ltd," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 115-124.
    17. Palanisamy Ganesan & Manohar Sridhar, 2016. "Service Innovation and Customer Performance of Telecommunication Service Provider: A Study on Mediation Effect of Corporate Reputation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 77-101, February.
    18. Ozge Mehtap & Ozgur Kokalan, 2013. "The relationship between corporate reputation and organizational citizenship behavior: a comparative study on TV companies and banks," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3609-3619, October.
    19. Jae-woong Yoo & Hyun-seon Lee & Young-ju Jin, 2018. "Effects of Celebrity Credibility on Country’s Reputation: A Comparison of an Olympic Star and a Political Leader," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 127-136, September.
    20. Yunjeong Kim & Kyung Wha Oh, 2020. "Effects of Perceived Sustainability Level of Sportswear Product on Purchase Intention: Exploring the Roles of Perceived Skepticism and Perceived Brand Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpn:umkeip:v:14:y:2015:i:2:p:155-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Miroslawa Buczynska (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.wydawnictwoumk.pl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.