IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000180/014119.html

Ajuste de una función de producción al sector financiero en Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Ramírez Vigoya

Abstract

Resumen Este trabajo desarrolla en forma pormenorizada la metodología de datos panel para encontrar la mejor especificación econométrica de una función de producción, al comparar la Cobb-Douglas y la translogarítmica con datos del sector financiero colombiano. Se encuentra que la función que mejor se ajusta es la translogarítmica con efectos fijos, lo que indica que, por un lado, existen diferencias significativas en los retornos del capital y del trabajo sobre los ingresos entre bancos y, por otro lado, que existen efectos de segundo orden en el sector y que las elasticidades son variables. Además, se encuentra que el capital y el trabajo tienen productividades marginales decrecientes y estos dos factores son complementarios. Por otro lado, se demuestra que la elasticidad del capital es unitaria y significativa, mientras que el factor trabajo solo complementa al capital, siendo más una herramienta que un aporte significativo para el ingreso de los bancos.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Ramírez Vigoya, 2015. "Ajuste de una función de producción al sector financiero en Colombia," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 0(1), pages 141-156.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000180:014119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rfce/v23n1/v23n1a08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnold Zellner & Hang Ryu, 1998. "Alternative functional forms for production, cost and returns to scale functions," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(2), pages 101-127.
    2. Christensen, Laurits R & Jorgenson, Dale W & Lau, Lawrence J, 1973. "Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 55(1), pages 28-45, February.
    3. Kim, H Youn, 1992. "The Translog Production Function and Variable Returns to Scale," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 74(3), pages 546-552, August.
    4. Brown, Byron W, 1970. "Tests for Cobb-Douglas and CES Production Functions," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 11(1), pages 77-83, February.
    5. Rainer Klump & Harald Preissler, 2000. "CES Production Functions and Economic Growth," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(1), pages 41-56, March.
    6. Dairo Estrada & Poldy Osorio, 2004. "Effects of Financial Capital on Colombian Banking Efficiency," Revista ESPE - Ensayos sobre Política Económica, Banco de la Republica de Colombia, vol. 22(47), pages 162-201, December.
    7. Humphrey, David Burras & Moroney, John R, 1975. "Substitution among Capital, Labor, and Natural Resource Products in American Manufacturing," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 83(1), pages 57-82, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tzouvelekas, Evaggelos, 2000. "Approximation Properties and Estimation of the Translog Production Function with Panel Data," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 1(01), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Hossein Mirshojaeian Hosseini & Shinji Kaneko, 2013. "Fuel Conservation Effect of Energy Subsidy Reform in Iran," Working Papers 3-1, Faculty of Economics,University of Tehran.Tehran,Iran.
    3. Nguyen Ngoc Thach, 2020. "Macroeconomic Growth in Vietnam Transitioned to Market: An Unrestricted VES Framework," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, July.
    4. William Ridley & Stephen Devadoss, 2021. "The Effects of COVID‐19 on Fruit and Vegetable Production," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 329-340, March.
    5. Rodolfo Cermeño & Sirenia Vázquez, 2009. "Technological Backwardness in Agriculture: Is it Due to Lack of R&D, Human Capital, and Openness to International Trade?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 673-686, November.
    6. Richard Green & Nicholas Vasilakos, 2012. "Storing Wind for a Rainy Day: What Kind of Electricity Does Denmark Export?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 33(3), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Mirshojaeian Hosseini, Hossein & Majed, Vahid & Kaneko, Shinji, 2015. "The Effects of Energy Subsidy Reform on Fuel Demand in Iran," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 10(2), pages 23-47, January.
    8. Minor, Peter J., 2010. "Time as a Barrier to Trade: A GTAP Database of ad valorem Trade Time Costs," Conference papers 331960, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    9. Lall, Somik V. & Shalizi, Zmarak & Deichmann, Uwe, 2004. "Agglomeration economies and productivity in Indian industry," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 643-673, April.
    10. Jürgen Antony, 2010. "A class of changing elasticity of substitution production functions," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 100(2), pages 165-183, June.
    11. Boqiang Lin & Kui Liu, 2017. "Energy Substitution Effect on China’s Heavy Industry: Perspectives of a Translog Production Function and Ridge Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Harris, Patrick, 2020. "To what extent has climate change impacted the Total Factor Productivity of the Australian beef industry by state and as a country?," MPRA Paper 100795, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Gad Allon & Michael Beenstock & Steven Hackman & Ury Passy & Alexander Shapiro, 2007. "Nonparametric estimation of concave production technologies by entropic methods," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4), pages 795-816.
    14. Emilia Del Bono & Josh Kinsler & Ronni Pavan, 2022. "Identification of dynamic latent factor models of skill formation with translog production," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 1256-1265, September.
    15. Eckey, Hans-Friedrich & Kosfeld, Reinhold & Türck, Matthias, 2004. "Regionale Produktionsfunktionen mit Spillover-Effekten für Deutschland," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 64, University of Kassel, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    16. Growiec, Jakub & Mućk, Jakub, 2020. "Isoelastic Elasticity Of Substitution Production Functions," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(7), pages 1597-1634, October.
    17. Kim, Nam-Seok & Heshmati, Almas, 2017. "The Relationship between Economic Growth and Democracy: Alternative Representations of Technological Change," GLO Discussion Paper Series 85, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    18. Knoblach, Michael & Rößler, Martin & Zwerschke, Patrick, 2016. "The Elasticity of Factor Substitution Between Capital and Labor in the U.S. Economy: A Meta-Regression Analysis," CEPIE Working Papers 03/16, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    19. Hossein Mirshojaeian Hosseini & Shinji Kaneko, 2013. "Fuel Conservation Effect of Energy Subsidy Reform in Iran," IDEC DP2 Series 3-1, Hiroshima University, Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC).
    20. Luca Grassetti & Enrico Gori & Simona Caterina Minotti, 2005. "Multilevel flexible specification of the production function in health economics," Working Papers 20050402, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Dipartimento di Statistica.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000180:014119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Administrador (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femngco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.